Characterizing Extremely Negative Reviews of Ophthalmologists on Yelp.Com

被引:1
|
作者
Smith, Jacob F. [1 ]
Shah, Ami A. [2 ]
Qureshi, Muhammad B. [1 ]
Luong, Hanna N. [1 ]
Adeleye, Olufunmilola [1 ]
Adams, Olufemi E. [3 ]
Shen, Joanne F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Alix Sch Med, Scottsdale, AZ 85259 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Ophthalmol, Phoenix, AZ USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dept Ophthalmol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
Healthcare delivery; online reviews; ophthalmology; patient satisfaction; practice management; PATIENT SATISFACTION; ONLINE REVIEWS; CARE; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1080/08820538.2022.2064193
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose To perform a retrospective characterization of one-star reviews of ophthalmologists on Yelp.com and to increase understanding of patient complaints on Yelp.com. Methods A search was performed for reviews on Yelp.com using the keyword "ophthalmologist" for the top 8 most population-dense metropolitan areas in the United States. One-star reviews were collected and classified as procedural or nonprocedural. Complaints were also categorized as clinical, nonclinical, or both. Clinical complaints cited issues such as complications, reoperations, uncontrolled pain, misdiagnosis, unclear treatment plan, etc. Nonclinical complaints included comments such as physician bedside manner, other staff interpersonal manner, wait time, brevity of appointment time, etc. Results 5,532 total reviews were assessed, of which 477 (9%) one-star reviews were included in the study for analysis. These reviews amounted to 1,120 distinct complaints. 287 (26%) were clinical in nature and 833 (74%) were nonclinical. Technical incompetence or error (50: 4%), unsatisfactory results (46: 4%), and complications (43: 4%) represented the most common clinical complaints while office staff interpersonal manner (182: 16%), wait time (174: 16%), and physician interpersonal manner (141: 13%) were the most common nonclinical complaints. Refractive surgery was the most frequently mentioned subspecialty (89: 8%). Patients undergoing an ophthalmic procedure (surgery, injection, etc.) wrote 64 reviews that resulted in 193 (17%) complaints. Nonprocedural patients wrote 413 reviews that resulted in 927 (83%) complaints. Compared with procedural reviews, nonprocedural reviews were less likely to include a clinical complaint (rate ratio, 0.3: P < .001). Discussion The majority of one-star reviews of ophthalmologists included in this study were nonclinical. Complaints referencing a procedural episode were more likely to include a clinical component in the review. In the era of intense medical consumerism and increased physician and health care institution competition for patient acquisition and retention, the characterization of excessively negative reviews allows identification of potential areas of concern for patients that use online review sites such as Yelp.com.
引用
收藏
页码:661 / 667
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Characterizing extremely negative reviews of ophthalmologists on yelp.com
    Smith, Jacob Freeman
    Qureshi, Muhammad
    Adeleye, Olufunmilola
    Luong, Hanna
    Shen, Joanne
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2022, 63 (07)
  • [2] A Qualitative Assessment of Yelp.Com Users' Motivations to Submit and Read Restaurant Reviews
    Parikh, Anish A.
    Behnke, Carl
    Nelson, Doug
    Vorvoreanu, Mihaela
    Almanza, Barbara
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CULINARY SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 13 (01) : 1 - 18
  • [3] Motives for reading and articulating user-generated restaurant reviews on Yelp.com
    Parikh, Anish
    Behnke, Carl
    Vorvoreanu, Mihaela
    Almanza, Barbara
    Nelson, Doug
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 5 (02) : 160 - 176
  • [4] Exploring extremity and negativity biases in online reviews: Evidence from Yelp.com
    Roh, Minjung
    Yang, Sung-Byung
    [J]. SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2021, 49 (11):
  • [5] Recursive Profiles of Businesses and Reviewers on Yelp.com
    Triff, Matt
    Lingras, Pawan
    [J]. ROUGH SETS, FUZZY SETS, DATA MINING, AND GRANULAR COMPUTING, 2013, 8170 : 325 - 336
  • [6] Aggregation of consumer ratings: an application to Yelp.com
    Weijia (Daisy) Dai
    Ginger Jin
    Jungmin Lee
    Michael Luca
    [J]. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 2018, 16 : 289 - 339
  • [7] Aggregation of consumer ratings: an application to Yelp.com
    Dai, Weijia
    Jin, Ginger
    Lee, Jungmin
    Luca, Michael
    [J]. QME-QUANTITATIVE MARKETING AND ECONOMICS, 2018, 16 (03): : 289 - 339
  • [8] An empirical examination of online restaurant reviews on Yelp.com A dual coding theory perspective
    Yang, Sung-Byung
    Hlee, Sunyoung
    Lee, Jimin
    Koo, Chulmo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2017, 29 (02) : 817 - 839
  • [9] Why people use Yelp.com: An exploration of uses and gratifications
    Hicks, Amy
    Comp, Stephen
    Horovitz, Jeannie
    Hovarter, Madeline
    Miki, Maya
    Bevan, Jennifer L.
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2012, 28 (06) : 2274 - 2279
  • [10] Brand local: Consumer evaluations as commodity activism on Yelp.com
    Kuehn, Kathleen M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER CULTURE, 2017, 17 (02) : 205 - 224