Does government institutional reform deter corporate tax evasion? Evidence from China

被引:2
|
作者
Xu, Junbing [1 ]
Zhu, Minling [2 ]
Song, Shengying [3 ]
Wu, Yunxi [4 ]
机构
[1] Minjiang Univ, NewHuadu Business Sch, Fuzhou, Fujian, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Agr Univ, Econ Coll, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Jimei Univ, Inst Finance & Econ, Xiamen, Fujian, Peoples R China
[4] Fuzhou Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Fuzhou, Fujian, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 12期
关键词
AVOIDANCE; ENFORCEMENT; INCENTIVES; OWNERSHIP; AUDIT; IRS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0273372
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Exploiting the quasi-natural experiment of the social insurance collection system reform implemented in China in 2000, based on data from China's industrial enterprise database from 1998 to 2006, we use the difference-in-differences method to test the impact of changing the social insurance collection institution on corporate tax evasion. We find that changing the social insurance collection institution from the social security department to the local tax department significantly deters corporate tax evasion. A series of robustness tests also support this conclusion. The reason is changing the social insurance collection institution to the local tax department increases its' social insurance information of the enterprise, and reduces the information asymmetry between the enterprise and the collection institution. Furthermore, we find that the impact of changing the social insurance collection institution on corporate tax evasion is more evident in the samples of labor-intensive enterprises, low labor cost enterprises, and enterprises under the jurisdiction of the local tax department. These results indicate that government institutional reform is a valid way to reduce the information asymmetry between the government and enterprises, which will finally deter corporate tax evasion.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Do tax incentives decelerate corporate financialization? Evidence from the VAT reform in China
    Li, Xing
    Shen, Guangjun
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2023, 125
  • [22] Does ESG performance affect corporate tax avoidance? Evidence from China
    Jiang, Hongli
    Hu, Wenjie
    Jiang, Pengcheng
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 61
  • [23] Does corporate tax planning mitigate financial constraints? Evidence from China
    Sun, Jie
    Makosa, Lewis
    Yang, Jinkun
    Yin, Fangyuan
    Sitsha, Lovemore
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCE & ECONOMICS, 2023, 28 (01) : 510 - 527
  • [24] Does institutional ownership affect corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China
    Zhou, Taiyun
    Liu, Mingxuan
    Zhang, Xiyu
    Qi, Zheng
    Qin, Ni
    [J]. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2024, 81 : 84 - 98
  • [25] Corporate Taxation and Evasion Responses: Evidence from a Minimum Tax in Honduras
    Lobel, Felipe
    Scot, Thiago
    Zuniga, Pedro
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2024, 16 (01) : 482 - 517
  • [26] Does flattening the government hierarchy improve corporate innovation? Evidence from China
    Liu, Yawei
    Zhang, Zhaoguo
    Zhai, Huayun
    Chan, Kam C.
    [J]. REGIONAL STUDIES, 2023, 57 (08) : 1559 - 1577
  • [27] How Does Taxation Affect Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from a Korean Tax Reform
    Park, Hyejin
    Lee, Jiyoon
    Shin, Jewon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2024, 192 (04) : 745 - 774
  • [28] Earnings management around tax rate reduction: evidence from China's 2007 corporate tax reform
    Zeng, Tao
    [J]. ASIAN REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING, 2014, 22 (03) : 304 - 317
  • [29] Tax structure and corporate tax compliance: evidence from China
    Yu, Jingyuan
    [J]. ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2022,
  • [30] Do foreign investors deter corporate fraud? Evidence from China
    Liang, Quanxi
    Gao, Wenlian
    Xie, Hongji
    [J]. QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2022, 84 : 92 - 111