Fifth Amendment - Double Jeopardy Clause - Separate Sovereigns Doctrine - Gamble v. United States

被引：0

|

作者：

不详

机构：

来源：

HARVARD LAW REVIEW | 2019年 / 133卷 / 01期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：312 / 321

页数：10

相关论文

共 50 条

[21] FOURTH AMENDMENT REMEDIAL EQUILIBRATION: A COMMENT ON HERRING V. UNITED STATES AND PEARSON V. CALLAHAN
Owens, David B.
[J]. STANFORD LAW REVIEW, 2010, 62 (02) : 563 - 589
[22] Fifth Amendment - Due Process Clause - Equal Protection - Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California
不详
[J]. HARVARD LAW REVIEW, 2020, 134 (01) : 510 - 519
[23] FACIAL RECOGNITION AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT IN THE WAKE OF CARPENTER V. UNITED STATES
Doktor, Matthew
[J]. UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI LAW REVIEW, 2021, 89 (02) : 552 - 574
[24] Armed Career Criminal Act - Residual Clause - Johnson v. United States
不详
[J]. HARVARD LAW REVIEW, 2015, 129 (01) : 301 - 310
[25] The Constitutionality of Parallel Civil Forfeiture Proceedings and Criminal Prosecutions under the Double Jeopardy Clause in the United States
Escobar Veas, Javier
[J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE DIREITO PROCESSUAL PENAL, 2020, 6 (02) : 701 - 733
[26] UNITED STATES V. HATCH: THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT IN CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE
Mark, Joseph W.
[J]. DENVER UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 2014, 91 (03) : 693 - 713
[27] OPENING THE UMBRELLA: THE EXPANSION OF THE PROSECUTORIAL VINDICTIVENESS DOCTRINE IN UNITED STATES V. JENKINS
Bales, Melodie
[J]. CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 2010, 59 (03): : 855 - 882
[28] Bernstein v. United States Department of State: Encryption, justiciability, and the First Amendment
Movius, DT
[J]. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW, 1997, 49 (04) : 1051 - 1070
[29] The double jeopardy dilemma in combating domestic violence: A solution in United States v Dixon
Black, J
[J]. UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE JOURNAL OF FAMILY LAW, 1995, 33 (04): : 911 - 926
[30] THE 1ST AMENDMENT AND THE SECRECY STATE - SNEPP V. UNITED-STATES
MEDOW, JC
[J]. UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW, 1982, 130 (04) : 775 - 844

← 1 2 3 4 5 →