Evaluation of serological tests for detection of caprine antibody to Brucella melitensis

被引:19
|
作者
Nielsen, K
Gall, D
Smith, P
Bermudez, R
Moreno, F
Renteria, T
Ruiz, A
Aparicio, L
Vazquez, S
Dajer, A
Luna, E
Samartino, L
Halbert, G
机构
[1] Inst Anim Dis Res, Ottawa, ON K2H 8P9, Canada
[2] Univ Autonoma Baja California, Unidad Labs Diagnost, IICV, Mexicali 21100, Baja California, Mexico
[3] SAGARPA, Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico
[4] Univ Autonoma Yucatan, Fac Med Vet & Zootecn, Merida, Yucatan, Mexico
[5] Comis Nacl Sanidad Agropecuria, Coyoacan, DF, Mexico
[6] INTA, Inst Pathobiol, Castelar, Buenos Aires, Argentina
关键词
brucellosis; goat; sheep; diagnosis; conventional tests; primary binding assays;
D O I
10.1016/j.smallrumres.2004.06.006
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
A total of 2213 goat sera were tested by the indirect enzyme immunoassay (IELISA), the competitive enzyme immunoassay (CELISA), the fluorescence polarization assay (FPA), complement fixation test (CFT) and the buffered antigen plate agglutination test (BPAT) for their antibody against Brucella melitensis. Of these, 528 blood samples collected in EDTA were tested in the field by the FPA (bFPA). In addition, 249 goat milk samples were tested by IELISA (mELISA). The serum samples were classified based on their reactivity in the BPAT and CFT. A total of 716 sera were positive while 1497 gave negative reactions in both tests. Relative to the BPAT and CFT reactivity, the sensitivity and specificity of the assays were as follows: IELISA: 96.2 and 99.7%, CELISA: 93.6 and 99.4% and FPA: 88.7 and 98.9%, respectively. The bFPA gave sensitivity and specificity values relative to the BPAT and CFT of 92.3 and 61.6% while the mELISA, based on the serum BPAT and CFT of the paired animals gave a relative sensitivity value of 90.9% and a relative specificity value of 92.4%. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 258
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Real-time detection of Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis and Brucella suis
    Redkar, R
    Rose, S
    Bricker, B
    DelVecchio, V
    [J]. MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR PROBES, 2001, 15 (01) : 43 - 52
  • [22] Evaluation of tests employed in serological diagnosis of brucellosis caused by Brucella ovis
    Cerri, D
    Ebani, VV
    Pedrini, A
    Bassi, S
    Bey, RF
    Andreani, E
    Farina, R
    [J]. MICROBIOLOGICA, 2000, 23 (03): : 281 - 288
  • [23] IMMUNIZATION AGAINST BRUCELLA INFECTIONS - SEROLOGICAL AND IMMUNOLOGICAL STUDIES ON A SOLUBLE ANTIGEN FROM BRUCELLA MELITENSIS
    CHEN, TH
    ELBERG, SS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1969, 120 (02): : 143 - &
  • [24] Comparative evaluation of recombinant BP26 protein for serological diagnosis of Brucella melitensis infection in goats
    Gupta, V. K.
    Kumari, Ranjeeta
    Vohra, Jyoti
    Singh, S. V.
    Vihan, V. S.
    [J]. SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH, 2010, 93 (2-3) : 119 - 125
  • [25] The use of homologous antigen in the serological diagnosis of brucellosis caused by Brucella melitensis
    Tittarelli, M
    Giovannini, A
    Conte, A
    Di Ventura, M
    Nannini, D
    Caporale, V
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE SERIES B-INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND VETERINARY PUBLIC HEALTH, 2005, 52 (02): : 75 - 81
  • [26] SEROLOGICAL RESPONSE OF ADULT GOATS INFECTED WITH LIVE BRUCELLA-MELITENSIS
    WAGHELA, S
    [J]. BRITISH VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1978, 134 (06): : 565 - 571
  • [27] COMPARISON OF SEROLOGICAL TESTS FOR DIAGNOSIS OF CAPRINE BRUCELLOSIS
    BARBUDDHE, SB
    YADAVA, VK
    SINGH, DK
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 1995, 65 (11): : 1173 - 1176
  • [29] Detection of Brucella melitensis by BACTEC 9050 system
    Lepe, JA
    Guerrero, FJ
    Garrido, A
    Perea, R
    [J]. ENFERMEDADES INFECCIOSAS Y MICROBIOLOGIA CLINICA, 2001, 19 (06): : 267 - 269
  • [30] DETECTION OF BRUCELLA-MELITENSIS AND BRUCELLA-ABORTUS BY DNA AMPLIFICATION
    BAILY, GG
    KRAHN, JB
    DRASAR, BS
    STOKER, NG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 1992, 95 (04): : 271 - 275