Reconstruction of ecosystem flows using inverse methods:: how well do they work?

被引:40
|
作者
Vézina, AF [1 ]
Pahlow, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Bedford Inst Oceanog, Biol Oceanog Sect, Dartmouth, NS B2Y 4A2, Canada
关键词
ecosystem modelling; inverse method; mass balance models; food webs; biogeochemical cycles; numerical experiments; carbon cycling; nitrogen cycling;
D O I
10.1016/S0924-7963(03)00013-7
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Inverse modelling is used to synthesize multivariate observations from marine and freshwater ecosystems into descriptions of mass flows among ecological and biogeochemical components. However, the conditions that affect the accuracy of these analyses remain poorly understood. In particular, it is suspected that the steady-state assumption often used in these analyses and the flow minimization principle that underlie inverse modelling introduce distortions into the reconstructions of ecosystem flows, but these potential biases have not been quantitatively investigated. Simulated inverse experiments were conducted to shed some light on these issues. In these experiments, inverse analyses are run on 'artificial' observations generated from a mechanistic ecological-biogeochemical model. The simulated experiments indicate that the steady-state assumption has little impact on the accuracy of inverse reconstructions of ecosystem flows. Inverse analyses run on observations from simulations of transient states are as accurate as analyses ran on observations from simulations at steady state. The accuracy of inverse reconstructions is related to structural and dynamic features of the ecosystem. Inverse reconstructions on simulated ecosystems with weak nutrient recycling (dependent mostly on external nutrients) or with simple food webs show little bias. Reconstructions of simulated ecosystems with strong recycling or complex food webs show significantly more bias, with a tendency to overestimate small flows and to underestimate large flows. Despite these biases, inverse reconstructions were successful at detecting changes in flow structure associated with changes in simulated ecosystem properties. The simulations also indicate that the inverse analyses based on simultaneous accounting of more than one currency (e.g. carbon+nitrogen) should be preferred over analyses based on balancing only one currency (e.g. carbon or nitrogen). (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 77
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] TL;DR: how well do machines summarize our work?
    James P. Bagrow
    [J]. Nature, 2021, 590 : 36 - 36
  • [32] HOW WELL DO CCU PATIENT-NURSE CONTRACTS WORK
    ZIEMANN, KM
    DRACUP, K
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 1989, 89 (05) : 691 - &
  • [33] Re: How Well do Psychosocial Interventions Work in Bipolar Disorder?
    Fountoulakis, Konstantinos N.
    Siamouli, Melina
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 2009, 54 (08): : 578 - 578
  • [34] Relation Classification: How Well Do Neural Network Approaches Work?
    Dwivedi, Sri Nath
    Karnick, Harish
    Jain, Renu
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE GRAPHS AND SEMANTIC WEB, KGSWC 2020, 2020, 1232 : 102 - 112
  • [35] How do prehistorians work? Initiation to the methods of prehistoric archeology
    Connet, Nelly
    [J]. BULLETIN DE LA SOCIETE PREHISTORIQUE FRANCAISE, 2007, 104 (01): : 180 - 181
  • [36] SURVEY OF NONDESTRUCTIVE TEST METHODS - WHAT THEY DO HOW THEY WORK
    COFIELD, RE
    [J]. INSTRUMENTATION TECHNOLOGY, 1967, 14 (11): : 38 - &
  • [37] How and how well do workplace assessments work? Using contextual variations in a theory-based evaluation with a large N
    Dahler-Larsen, Peter
    Sundby, Anna
    Boodhoo, Adiilah
    [J]. EVALUATION, 2021, 27 (03) : 326 - 346
  • [38] Splitting headache: How well do splitting methods preserve stability?
    Mincsovics, Miklos E.
    Kalmar-Nagy, Tamas
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NON-LINEAR MECHANICS, 2023, 149
  • [39] How well do semiempirical QM methods describe the structure of proteins?
    Rezac, J.
    Stewart, J. J. P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 158 (04):
  • [40] Assessment of infant sleep: how well do multiple methods compare?
    Camerota, Marie
    Tully, Kristin P.
    Grimes, Melissa
    Gueron-Sela, Noa
    Propper, Cathi B.
    [J]. SLEEP, 2018, 41 (10)