Moderate grazing increases newly assimilated carbon allocation belowground

被引:5
|
作者
Zhao, Yan [1 ,2 ]
Tian, Yuqiang [1 ,2 ]
Gao, Qiong [3 ]
Li, Xiaobing [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Yong [4 ]
Ding, Yong [4 ]
Ouyang, Shengnan [1 ,2 ]
Yurtaev, Andrey [5 ]
Kuzyakov, Yakov [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Geog Sci, Sch Nat Resources, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Puerto Rico Rio Piedras, Dept Environm Sci, San Juan, PR 00936 USA
[4] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Grassland Res, Hohhot 010010, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Tyumen, X Bio Inst, Tyumen 625003, Russia
[6] Peoples Friendship Univ Russia, Agrotechnol Inst, Moscow 117198, Russia
[7] Univ Goettingen, Dept Soil Sci Temperate Ecosyst, Dept Agr Soil Sci, Gottingen, Germany
来源
RHIZOSPHERE | 2022年 / 22卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Grazing intensity; Belowground C allocation; C-13 pulse Labeling; Newly assimilated C; Temperate grassland; Land use; Rhizosphere processes; NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION; SOIL ORGANIC-CARBON; QINGHAI-TIBETAN PLATEAU; INNER-MONGOLIA; TEMPERATE GRASSLAND; MICROBIAL BIOMASS; ECOSYSTEM RESPIRATION; ENZYME-ACTIVITIES; ROOT EXUDATION; ALPINE MEADOW;
D O I
10.1016/j.rhisph.2022.100547
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Newly assimilated carbon (C) allocated to soil is the main source of C and energy for microorganisms and has a high impact on long-term C sequestration. The removal of aboveground plant biomass by grazing may increase, decrease or have no effects on belowground C allocation. Therefore, it is important to understand how grazing modifies the allocation of assimilates between above-and belowground. An in situ C-13 labeling experiment was carried out in a temperate grassland with three grazing intensities: no grazing, moderate grazing (6 sheep.ha(- 1)) and heavy grazing (9 sheep.ha(- 1)). Eighty-one days after C-13 labeling, plants under moderate grazing allocated more recently assimilated C (8.2% of assimilated C-13) to shoots than plants under no grazing and heavy grazing (5.5% each). Substantially more C-13 was allocated belowground under moderate grazing, and was mainly stored in roots (11%) and soil (15%), than under no grazing (3.2% in roots and 7.5% in soil) and heavy grazing (4.1% in roots and 6.9% in soil). Moderate and heavy grazing release less (CO2)-C-13 (15%) through root and rhizomicrobial respiration than no grazing (19%). Without grazing, the decomposition rate of rhizodeposits and their utilization for root and rhizomicrobial respiration (0.22 +/- 0.07 day(-1)) was much faster than that under grazing (moderate grazing: 0.050 +/- 0.01 day (-1), heavy grazing: 0.065 +/- 0.01 day (-1)). In summary, moderate grazing increases the stock and stability of newly assimilated C of soil by increasing belowground allocation of photosynthates and decreasing CO2 efflux from soil. Therefore, compared to without and heavy grazing (9 sheep.ha(- 1)), moderate grazing (6 sheep.ha(- 1)) may be more suitable for soil C sequestration in temperate grasslands.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Moderate sheep grazing increases arthropod biomass and habitat use by steppe birds
    Gomez-Catasus, Julia
    Reverter, Margarita
    Bustillo-de la Rosa, Daniel
    Barrero, Adrian
    Perez-Granados, Cristian
    Zurdo, Julia
    Traba, Juan
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 354
  • [42] Nematode grazing increases the allocation of plant-derived carbon to soil bacteria and saprophytic fungi, and activates bacterial species of the rhizosphere
    Mielke, Lydia
    Taubert, Martin
    Cesarz, Simone
    Ruess, Liliane
    Kuesel, Kirsten
    Gleixner, Gerd
    Lange, Markus
    [J]. PEDOBIOLOGIA, 2022, 90
  • [43] Above- to belowground carbon allocation in peatlands shifts with plant functional type and temperature
    Zeh, Lilli
    Schmidt-Cotta, Claudia
    Limpens, Juul
    Bragazza, Luca
    Kalbitz, Karsten
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION AND SOIL SCIENCE, 2022, 185 (01) : 98 - 109
  • [44] A global trend in belowground carbon allocation: Can we use the relationship at smaller scales?
    Gower, ST
    Pongracic, S
    Landsberg, JJ
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 1996, 77 (06) : 1750 - 1755
  • [45] Decomposer diversity increases biomass production and shifts aboveground-belowground biomass allocation of common wheat
    Nico Eisenhauer
    Anja Vogel
    Britta Jensen
    Stefan Scheu
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 8
  • [46] Aspect differences in above- and belowground carbon allocation: a Montana case-study
    Coble, D
    Marshall, J
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2002, 116 : S149 - S155
  • [47] Decomposer diversity increases biomass production and shifts aboveground-belowground biomass allocation of common wheat
    Eisenhauer, Nico
    Vogel, Anja
    Jensen, Britta
    Scheu, Stefan
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [48] Altering carbon allocation within a plant increases cellulose
    Xue, BG
    Ellis, D
    Newton, C
    Gawley, B
    Gilbert, M
    Fan, S
    Sutton, B
    [J]. 1997 BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES SYMPOSIUM, 1997, : 519 - 523
  • [49] Total Belowground Carbon Allocation in a Fast-growing Eucalyptus Plantation Estimated Using a Carbon Balance Approach
    Christian P. Giardina
    Michael G. Ryan
    [J]. Ecosystems, 2002, 5 : 487 - 499
  • [50] Total belowground carbon allocation in a fast-growing Eucalyptus plantation estimated using a carbon balance approach
    Giardina, CP
    Ryan, MG
    [J]. ECOSYSTEMS, 2002, 5 (05) : 487 - 499