Shock boundary layer interactions in a low aspect ratio duct

被引:11
|
作者
Campo, Laura M. [1 ]
Eaton, John K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Shock waves; Separated flow; Confinement effects; Mach stem; Experimental database; Validation; IMAGE VELOCIMETRY MEASUREMENTS; LOW-FREQUENCY UNSTEADINESS; SUPERSONIC TURBULENT-FLOW; LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION; TIME ORGANIZATION; MACH REFLECTION; WAVES; FLUCTUATIONS; TRANSITION; SPACE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2014.10.003
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Experimental data acquired using high resolution two-component particle image velocimetry (PIV) are presented for shock boundary layer interactions (SBLIs) generated by a compression-expansion ramp geometry. The incident oblique shock wave is generated by a sub-boundary layer height ramp inclined 20 degrees to the M-infinity = 2.05 inflow. Results are presented for two different ramp sizes (h(ramp)/delta(0) = 0.56 and h(ramp)/delta(0) = 0.93), and compared to a previously documented h(ramp)/delta(0) = 0.20 case. For each case, mean velocitiy and turbulent statistics for both the SBLI at the foot of the compression ramp and the incident/reflected SBLI on the opposite wall are analyzed. Data are acquired in several streamwise-vertical planes across the span of the low aspect ratio duct in order to document spanwise non-uniformities and confinement effects, with the specific goal of producing a high quality experimental database for CFD validation. The angles of the incident and reflected shock waves become steeper as the side wall is approached, due to the lower velocities within the side wall boundary layer. Mean flow reversal is observed near the spanwise centerline of the duct, but only instantaneous flow reversal is seen closer to the side walls. These spanwise non-uniformities are more prominent for the stronger interactions caused by the larger ramp geometry. For this case there is no nominally two-dimensional region of the flow, and a Mach stem occurs in the core of the flow, causing a significant subsonic wake. The shock excursion length scale relative to the incoming boundary layer thickness, L-ex/delta(0), is measured for all of the shock features and found to be significantly lower than values reported in the literature for similar flows. Furthermore, L-ex/delta(0) for the reflected shock does not depend on the strength of the incident shock or the size of the separated zone. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 371
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] On low-frequency unsteadiness in swept shock wave-boundary layer interactions
    Ceci, Alessandro
    Palumbo, Andrea
    Larsson, Johan
    Pirozzoli, Sergio
    JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2023, 956
  • [22] On the low-frequency unsteadiness in shock wave-turbulent boundary layer interactions
    Hao, Jiaao
    JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2023, 971
  • [23] Shock/shock and shock/boundary layer interactions in an axisymmetric steady laminar flow
    Y. Burtschell
    D. E. Zeitoun
    Shock Waves, 2003, 12 : 487 - 495
  • [24] Shock/shock and shock/boundary layer interactions in an axisymmetric steady laminar flow
    Burtschell, Y
    Zeitoun, DE
    SHOCK WAVES, 2003, 12 (06) : 487 - 495
  • [25] Mechanism of shock unsteadiness in separated shock/boundary-layer interactions
    Agostini, L.
    Larcheveque, L.
    Dupont, P.
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2015, 27 (12)
  • [26] Scaling of hypersonic shock/turbulent boundary layer interactions
    Helm, Clara M.
    Martin, M. P.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW FLUIDS, 2021, 6 (07)
  • [27] Three dimensional shock wave/boundary layer interactions
    Mowatt, S.
    Skews, B.
    SHOCK WAVES, 2011, 21 (05) : 467 - 482
  • [28] Considerations on shock wave/boundary layer interaction in undular hydraulic jumps in horizontal channels with a very high aspect ratio
    Ben Meftah, M.
    Mossa, M.
    Pollio, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MECHANICS B-FLUIDS, 2010, 29 (06) : 415 - 429
  • [29] STUDY OF SWEPT SHOCK WAVE AND BOUNDARY LAYER INTERACTIONS
    邓学蓥
    Chinese Journal of Aeronautics , 1998, (04) : 2 - 10
  • [30] Three dimensional shock wave/boundary layer interactions
    S. Mowatt
    B. Skews
    Shock Waves, 2011, 21 : 467 - 482