Molecular tug-of-war: Plant immune recognition of herbivory

被引:57
|
作者
Snoeck, Simon [1 ]
Guayazan-Palacios, Natalia [1 ]
Steinbrenner, Adam D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Biol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
来源
PLANT CELL | 2022年 / 34卷 / 05期
关键词
RICH REPEAT RECEPTOR; GREEN PEACH APHID; MANDUCA-SEXTA; NICOTIANA-ATTENUATA; DEFENSE RESPONSES; ORAL SECRETIONS; PROTEINASE-INHIBITOR; PATTERN-RECOGNITION; INSECT RESISTANCE; ELICITOR PEPTIDES;
D O I
10.1093/plcell/koac009
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This review describes the mechanisms by which plants perceive chewing and piercing-sucking herbivores, as well as the downstream signaling pathways that mediate specific responses. Plant defense responses against insect herbivores are induced through wound-induced signaling and the specific perception of herbivore-associated molecular patterns (HAMPs). In addition, herbivores can deliver effectors that suppress plant immunity. Here we review plant immune recognition of HAMPs and effectors, and argue that these initial molecular interactions upon a plant-herbivore encounter mediate and structure effective resistance. While the number of distinct HAMPs and effectors from both chewing and piercing-sucking herbivores has expanded rapidly with omics-enabled approaches, paired receptors and targets in the host are still not well characterized. Herbivore-derived effectors may also be recognized as HAMPs depending on the host plant species, potentially through the evolution of novel immune receptor functions. We compile examples of HAMPs and effectors where natural variation between species may inform evolutionary patterns and mechanisms of plant-herbivore interactions. Finally, we discuss the combined effects of wounding and HAMP recognition, and review potential signaling hubs, which may integrate both sensing functions. Understanding the precise mechanisms for plant sensing of herbivores will be critical for engineering resistance in agriculture.
引用
收藏
页码:1497 / 1513
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] COMMUNIST TUG-OF-WAR IN INDIA
    PALMER, ND
    [J]. PROBLEMS OF COMMUNISM, 1974, 23 (04): : 61 - 64
  • [42] A Tug-of-War Over Methionine
    Xu, Ke
    Shyu, Amy
    Li, Ming O.
    [J]. CELL METABOLISM, 2020, 32 (05) : 699 - 701
  • [43] A tug-of-war to control plant emission of an airborne alarm signal
    Jie Hao
    Junfei Ma
    Hua Shi
    Ying Wang
    [J]. Stress Biology, 3
  • [44] Eternal peace in the tug-of-war?
    Samuel Häfner
    [J]. Economic Theory, 2022, 74 : 1057 - 1101
  • [45] Tug-of-war during senescence
    Ulrike Zentgraf
    [J]. Nature Plants, 2019, 5 : 129 - 130
  • [46] The Anthropologist in the Middle of a Tug-of-War
    Berliner, David
    [J]. MEN AND MASCULINITIES, 2008, 11 (02) : 174 - 185
  • [47] SCIENCE POLICY IN A TUG-OF-WAR
    SLAKEY, F
    [J]. NEW SCIENTIST, 1994, 142 (1929) : 47 - 47
  • [48] A TUG-OF-WAR OVER TOLERANCE
    FEGE, AF
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP, 1994, 51 (04) : 22 - 23
  • [49] THE MANAGEMENT FEES TUG-OF-WAR
    ROHRER, J
    [J]. INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR, 1980, 14 (10): : 139 - &
  • [50] TUG-OF-WAR FOR THE ANTARCTIC KRILL
    ALVERSON, DL
    [J]. OCEAN DEVELOPMENT AND INTERNATIONAL LAW, 1980, 8 (02): : 171 - 182