Cost-benefit analysis of GHG emission reduction in waste to energy projects of China under clean development mechanism

被引:34
|
作者
Wang, Yuan [1 ]
Geng, Shengnan [1 ]
Zhao, Peng [1 ]
Du, Huibin [2 ]
He, Yu [1 ]
Crittenden, John [3 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, China Australia Ctr Sustainable Urban Dev, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, 92 Weijin Rd, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[3] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Brook Byers Inst Sustainable Syst, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Cost-benefit analysis; Greenhouse gas; Municipal solid waste; Waste-to-energy; GREENHOUSE GASES; MANAGEMENT; INCINERATION; CARBON;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.02.010
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Energy recovery is widely considered an important part of hierarchy of waste management. Previously, researchers have primarily focused on cost-effectiveness analysis of solid waste management, ignoring the global warming potential (GWP) impacts. By integrating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and the cost-benefit analysis, we analyzed the cost-benefit of GHG emissions for two waste to energy (WtE) methods: incineration with combined heat and power (ICHP) which produces electricity and heat, and landfill disposal with landfill gas utilization (LGU). We calculated both costs and benefits per ton certified GHG emission reductions (CER) for 20 clean development mechanism (CDM) projects with WtE technology in typical northern and southern cities in China. Furthermore, benefits were analyzed under two different scenarios: benefit only from recovery energy revenues; benefit from recovery energy revenues plus gate fee revenues. The results show that: (1) ICHP projects are beneficial from the GHG reduction standpoint; (2) The ratio of CER revenues to benefit is very high during 2008-2011. However, the decrease of CER price in CDM projects causes the disposal gate fee from local government to become more and more important for these two WtE technologies, especially for LGU. However, with or without the CDM, there is still a huge GHG reduction potential in solid waste management in China. Policies should be developed to facilitate and encourage WtE, and the selection of WtE method depends on geographical region and economics. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 95
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Research on the development mode of clean energy heating and its carbon emission reduction benefit in Beijing
    Fu, Guanjun
    Wu, Shengyu
    [J]. THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2019, 227
  • [32] Cost-Benefit Analysis of Green Infrastructures on Community Stormwater Reduction and Utilization: A Case of Beijing, China
    Wen Liu
    Weiping Chen
    Qi Feng
    Chi Peng
    Peng Kang
    [J]. Environmental Management, 2016, 58 : 1015 - 1026
  • [33] The Impact of Users' Lifestyle in Zero-Energy and Emission Buildings: An Application of Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Becchio, Cristina
    Bertoncini, Martina
    Boggio, Adele
    Bottero, Marta
    Corgnati, Stefano Paolo
    Dell'Anna, Federico
    [J]. NEW METROPOLITAN PERSPECTIVES: LOCAL KNOWLEDGE AND INNOVATION DYNAMICS TOWARDS TERRITORY ATTRACTIVENESS THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF HORIZON/E2020/AGENDA2030 - VOL 1, 2019, 100 : 123 - 131
  • [34] Cost-Benefit Analysis of Green Infrastructures on Community Stormwater Reduction and Utilization: A Case of Beijing, China
    Liu, Wen
    Chen, Weiping
    Feng, Qi
    Peng, Chi
    Kang, Peng
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 58 (06) : 1015 - 1026
  • [35] Levelized Cost of Electricity Generation by Small Hydropower Projects under Clean Development Mechanism in India
    Patro, Epari Ritesh
    Kishore, Teegala Srinivasa
    Haghighi, Ali Torabi
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (04)
  • [36] Emission reduction from Clean Development Mechanism projects on intensive livestock farms and its economic benefits
    Li, Yu'e
    Dong, Hongmin
    Wan, Yunfan
    Qin, Xiaobo
    Gao, Qingzhu
    Hua, Luo
    [J]. Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2009, 25 (01): : 194 - 198
  • [37] A COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS-BASED INTERPRETATION OF RECIPROCITY UNDER CLEAN AIR ACT SECTION 115(C)
    Dennison, Jim
    [J]. VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW, 2017, 103 (07) : 1561 - 1610
  • [38] Sustainable regeneration of waste polystyrene foam as cooling coating: Building cooling energy saving, CO2 emission reduction and cost-benefit prospective
    Feng, Shuangjiang
    Yao, Lei
    Feng, Mingxin
    Cai, Haoran
    He, Xu
    He, Man
    Bu, Xiaohai
    Zhou, Yuming
    Zhang, Tao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 434
  • [39] Analysis of the potential for implementing clean development mechanism projects through clean energy policy for the energy and transportation sectors of Thailand
    Mangmeechai, Aweewan
    [J]. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 2014, 14 (03) : 220 - 231
  • [40] Analysis of energy conservation and GHG emission reduction potential of shaanxi province under the LEAP model
    Qiu S.
    Wang X.
    Bi S.
    Wu J.
    Song Y.
    [J]. Wu, Jiangtao, 1600, Xi'an Jiaotong University (50): : 28 - 35