Biosafety assessment of transgenic plants in the greenhouse and the field - A case study of transgenic cucumber

被引:3
|
作者
Koga-Ban, Y [1 ]
Tabei, Y
Ishimoto, M
Nishizawa, Y
Tsuchiya, K
Imaizumi, N
Nakamura, H
Kayano, T
Tanaka, H
机构
[1] Natl Inst Agrobiol Sci, Plant Biotechnol Dept, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058502, Japan
[2] Natl Agr Res Ctr, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058666, Japan
来源
关键词
chitinase; genetically modified plant;
D O I
10.6090/jarq.38.167
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
We have developed transgenic cucumber plants Cucumis sativus L. resistant to gray mold (Booytis cinerea) by the expression of rice chitinase cDNA (Tabei et al. 1998). These transgenic plants were obtained by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, and the introduced rice chitinase cDNA was driven by the CaMV 35S promoter. The biosafety assessment of the transformed cucumber plants was carefully performed to confirm that their characteristics are equivalent to those of non-transgenic plants except for harboring gray mold resistance. The biosafety assessment was carried out successively in full-containment greenhouse, semi-containment greenhouse, isolated field, and finally in ordinary field trials. The following items were compared between transgenic and non-transgenic cucumber plants: (1) morphological characteristics of plants and fruits;, (2) reproductive characteristics, e.g. pollen morphology and fertility, longevity of the pollen, pollen dispersal by wind, and seed fertilities; (3) possibility of harmful influences on the environment due to the production of detrimental substances i.e. volatile compounds,,plant parts and root secreta; (4) influence on soil microflora and; (5) presence of remaining Agrobacterium tumefaciens, which was used as a vector in the production of the transgenic cucumber. Throughout the biosafety assessment, we did not find any substantial differences except the expression of rice chitinase gene and resistance to gray mold between transgenic and non-transgenic cucumber plants.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 174
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biosafety and risk assessment of transgenic sugarcane plants
    Badawy O.M.
    El-Seehy M.M.
    Saadalla M.M.
    Badran M.S.
    Salem E.S.
    Sugar Tech, 2008, 10 (3) : 234 - 242
  • [2] Prospecting for Microelement Function and Biosafety Assessment of Transgenic Cereal Plants
    Yu, Xiaofen
    Luo, Qingchen
    Huang, Kaixun
    Yang, Guangxiao
    He, Guangyuan
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2018, 9
  • [3] Biosafety risk assessment and the regulatory framework for the release of transgenic plants
    Millis, NF
    MOLECULAR BREEDING OF FORAGE CROPS, 2001, 10 : 317 - 323
  • [4] Research on biosafety of transgenic plants.
    刘传光
    林青山
    江奕君
    高云
    中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2003, (03) : 181 - 183
  • [5] Transgenic plants and biosafety concerns in India
    Ghosh, PK
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 1997, 72 (03): : 172 - 179
  • [6] Biosafety of transgenic crops: Precautions for case-by-case risk assessment
    Bhat, S. R.
    Chopra, V. L.
    Current Science, 74 (01):
  • [7] Biosafety of transgenic crops: Precautions for case-by-case risk assessment
    Bhat, SR
    Chopra, VL
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 1998, 74 (01): : 16 - 17
  • [8] Development and deployment of transgenic plants: Biosafety considerations
    Sharma, KK
    Sharma, HC
    Seetharama, N
    Ortiz, R
    IN VITRO CELLULAR & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY-PLANT, 2002, 38 (02) : 106 - 115
  • [9] Development and deployment of transgenic plants: Biosafety considerations
    Kiran K. Sharma
    H. C. Sharma
    N. Seetharama
    Rodomiro Ortiz
    In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant, 2002, 38 : 106 - 115
  • [10] Thaumatin expression in transgenic cucumber plants
    Szwacka, M
    Krzymowska, M
    Malepszy, S
    PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY AND IN VITRO BIOLOGY IN THE 21ST CENTURY, 1999, 36 : 609 - 612