Birds Bug on Indirect Plant Defenses to Locate Insect Prey

被引:11
|
作者
Hiltpold, Ivan [1 ]
Shriver, W. Gregory [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Delaware, Dept Entomol & Wildlife Ecol, Newark, DE 19716 USA
关键词
Bird chemical ecology; Avian olfaction; Insectivorous birds; Herbivore-induced plant volatiles; Volatile cues; Maize; Terpene; Pest management; ATTRACTION; VOLATILES;
D O I
10.1007/s10886-018-0962-0
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
It has long been thought that most birds do not use volatile cues to perceive their environment. Aside from some scavenging birds, this large group of vertebrates was believed to mostly rely on highly developed vision while foraging and there are relatively few studies exploring bird response to volatile organic compounds. In response to insect herbivory, plants release volatile organic compounds to attract parasitoids and predators of the pests. To test if insectivorous birds use herbivore-induced plant volatiles (HIPV), dispensers emitting a synthetic blend of HIPV typically emitted after insect herbivory were deployed in a maize field along with imitation clay caterpillars. Significantly more imitation insects were attacked by birds when located close to dispensers releasing HIPV than close to dispenser with organic solvent only. Seven times more peck marks, an index of avian predation, were counted on caterpillars in the vicinity of the HIPV dispensers than on insects close to control dispensers. This is the first field demonstration that insectivorous birds cue on HIPV to locate prey in agricultural settings. These results support the growing evidence that foraging birds exploit volatile cues. This more accurate understanding of their behavior will be important when implementing pest management program involving insectivorous birds.
引用
收藏
页码:576 / 579
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] INSECT PLANT INTERACTIONS - ENDOCRINE DEFENSES - DISCUSSION
    CLARKE, BC
    BOWERS, WS
    SOUTHWOOD, TRE
    BELL, EA
    GRESSEL, J
    ELLIOTT, M
    BRADSHAW, AD
    SAWICKI, RM
    HARTL, DL
    KUC, J
    GRAHAMBRYCE, IJ
    HARBORNE, JB
    [J]. CIBA FOUNDATION SYMPOSIA, 1984, 102 : 133 - 137
  • [12] Behavioral Sabotage of Plant Defenses by Insect Folivores
    Dussourd, David E.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENTOMOLOGY, VOL 62, 2017, 62 : 15 - 34
  • [13] Duration of Priming of Two Indirect Plant Defenses
    Choh, Yasuyuki
    Takabayashi, Junji
    [J]. PLANT SIGNALING & BEHAVIOR, 2007, 2 (01) : 13 - 14
  • [14] Changes of feeding behavior and salivary proteome of Brown Marmorated Stink Bug when exposed to insect-induced plant defenses
    Serteyn, Laurent
    Ponnet, Lola
    Saive, Matthew
    Fauconnier, Marie-Laure
    Francis, Frederic
    [J]. ARTHROPOD-PLANT INTERACTIONS, 2020, 14 (01) : 101 - 112
  • [15] INSECT DEFENSES AGAINST PHOTOTOXIC PLANT-CHEMICALS
    LARSON, RA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ECOLOGY, 1986, 12 (04) : 859 - 870
  • [16] Changes of feeding behavior and salivary proteome of Brown Marmorated Stink Bug when exposed to insect-induced plant defenses
    Laurent Serteyn
    Lola Ponnet
    Matthew Saive
    Marie-Laure Fauconnier
    Frederic Francis
    [J]. Arthropod-Plant Interactions, 2020, 14 : 101 - 112
  • [17] Plant viruses exploit insect salivary GAPDH to modulate plant defenses
    Wang, Xin
    Wu, Haibo
    Yu, Zhongkai
    Wu, Jing
    Lu, Chengcong
    Wei, Taiyun
    Chen, Qian
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 15 (01)
  • [18] Distribution patterns of birds and insect prey in a tropical riparian forest
    Chan, Eric K. W.
    Yu, Yat-Tung
    Zhang, Yixin
    Dudgeon, David
    [J]. BIOTROPICA, 2008, 40 (05) : 623 - 629
  • [19] Plant begomoviruses subvert ubiquitination to suppress plant defenses against insect vectors
    Li, Ping
    Liu, Chao
    Deng, Wen-Hao
    Yao, Dan-Mei
    Pan, Li-Long
    Li, Yun-Qin
    Liu, Yin-Quan
    Liang, Yan
    Zhou, Xue-Ping
    Wang, Xiao-Wei
    [J]. PLOS PATHOGENS, 2019, 15 (02)
  • [20] Sticky plant captures prey for symbiotic bug: is this digestive mutualism?
    Anderson, B.
    Kawakita, A.
    Tayasu, I.
    [J]. PLANT BIOLOGY, 2012, 14 (06) : 888 - 893