Assessing multi-scale values and multifunctionality in landscapes

被引:0
|
作者
Antrop, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Geog, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
来源
MULTIFUNCTIONAL LANDSCAPES, VOL I : THEORY, VALUES AND HISTORY | 2004年 / 14卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This article refers to the recommendations on Interdisciplinary Landscape Research by workshop 5 on "Values and assessment of multifunctional landscapes" during the Conference on Multifunctional landscapes interdisciplinary approaches to landscape research and management held in Roskilde October 18-21, 2000. In particular, the difference between qualities and values is extended to the conceptual difference between land and landscape, the importance of scale in assessing values and the meaning of functionality regarding the assessment of typical 'post-productive' qualities such as aesthetic and symbolic ones. Arguments are given to show that restricting the assessment of multifunctionality merely to utility assessment in economic or ecological sense, can affect these values, in particular when considering different scales of valuing and considering the contextual values. As multifunctionality in landscapes is related to landscape heterogeneity and diversity and the assessment of values is also scale-dependent and different references are needed for evaluation. Also these references are changing, which is illustrated by the general transformation of the cultural landscape in Europe where the difference between rural and urbanised landscapes is gradually vanishing. New functions are superimposed or even replace the existing ones in the traditional landscapes and affect deeply the existing landscape qualities. The coexistence of multiple functions in the landscape is no guarantee for an overall increase of all landscape values. Future functions and their multifunctional combination needs to be assessed using a broad set of initial landscape values and be based upon general principles. These conclusions are important for planning and policy as also these act at different scale levels and affect the reference scales for evaluation at the local, regional, national and international level.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 180
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multi-scale optimization
    Lucia, A
    DiMaggio, PA
    EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER-AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING - 14, 2004, 18 : 1093 - 1098
  • [32] Multi-scale methods
    Liu, WK
    Hao, S
    Belytschko, T
    Li, SF
    Chang, CT
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2000, 47 (07) : 1343 - 1361
  • [33] The multi-scale approach
    Mazars, J
    MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES, 1999, 32 (220) : 402 - 402
  • [34] Multi-scale renormalization
    Phys Lett Sect B Nucl Elem Part High Energy Phys, 3-4 (342):
  • [35] Ecologies of Scale: Multifunctionality Connects Conservation and Agriculture across Fields, Farms, and Landscapes
    McGranahan, Devan Allen
    LAND, 2014, 3 (03) : 739 - 769
  • [36] Rule acquisition in generalized multi-scale information systems with multi-scale decisions
    Wu, Wei-Zhi
    Niu, Dongran
    Li, Jinhai
    Li, Tong -Jun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2023, 154 : 56 - 71
  • [37] A multi-scale perspective for assessing publishing circuits in non-hegemonic countries
    Beigel, Fernanda
    TAPUYA-LATIN AMERICAN SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2021, 4 (01)
  • [38] Assessing Recreational Load in Russia: A Multi-Scale Approach Using Big Data
    E. Yu. Kolbovsky
    O. A. Klimanova
    Regional Research of Russia, 2024, 14 (3) : 478 - 492
  • [39] Assessing the Scientific Impact of Individual Scholars With Multi-Scale H-Index
    Ma, Feng
    Huang, Yuan
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 226942 - 226951
  • [40] ASSESSING THE USABILITY OF DIGITAL IMAGES OF HUMAN PLACENTA WITH MULTI-SCALE FILTERING METHODS
    Nen Huynh
    Chang, Jen-Mei
    Katzmann, Philip
    Miller, Richard
    Moye, John
    Salafia, Carolyn
    PLACENTA, 2014, 35 (09) : A56 - A56