Harnessing Wicked Problems in Multi-stakeholder Partnerships

被引:149
|
作者
Dentoni, Domenico [1 ]
Bitzer, Verena [2 ,3 ]
Schouten, Greetje [4 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Management Studies Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] KIT Royal Trop Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Int Ctr Integrated Assessment & Sustainable Dev I, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus Univ, Rotterdam Sch Management, Partnerships Resource Ctr, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Wicked problems; Multi-stakeholder partnerships; Cross-sector partnerships; Governance processes; Systemic change; Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO); CROSS-SECTOR PARTNERSHIPS; SUSTAINABLE PALM OIL; ROUND-TABLE; VOLUNTARY STANDARDS; PRIVATE GOVERNANCE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; FOOD SECURITY; VALUE CHAINS; BUSINESS; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-018-3858-6
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Despite the burgeoning literature on the governance and impact of cross-sector partnerships in the past two decades, the debate on how and when these collaborative arrangements address globally relevant problems and contribute to systemic change remains open. Building upon the notion of wicked problems and the literature on governing such wicked problems, this paper defines harnessing problems in multi-stakeholder partnerships (MSPs) as the approach of taking into account the nature of the problem and of organizing governance processes accordingly. The paper develops an innovative analytical framework that conceptualizes MSPs in terms of three governance processes (deliberation, decision-making and enforcement) harnessing three key dimensions of wicked problems (knowledge uncertainty, value conflict and dynamic complexity). The Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil provides an illustrative case study on how this analytical framework describes and explains organizational change in partnerships from a problem-based perspective. The framework can be used to better understand and predict the complex relationships between MSP governance processes, systemic change and societal problems, but also as a guiding tool in (re-)organizing governance processes to continuously re-assess the problems over time and address them accordingly.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 356
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Intraorganizational Bargaining in Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives
    Cutcher-Gershenfeld, Joel
    [J]. NEGOTIATION JOURNAL, 2015, 31 (04) : 393 - 400
  • [42] Governing Nanotechnology in a Multi-Stakeholder World
    Ineke Malsch
    [J]. NanoEthics, 2013, 7 : 161 - 172
  • [43] Poster: Towards Multi-Stakeholder Clouds
    Borysei, Bohdan
    Saroiu, Stefan
    de Lara, Eyal
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2024 THE 25TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON MOBILE COMPUTING SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS, HOTMOBILE 2024, 2024, : 146 - 146
  • [44] How Multi-stakeholder is Global Policy?
    Khanna, Parag
    [J]. GLOBAL POLICY, 2012, 3 (03) : 384 - 390
  • [45] Governing Nanotechnology in a Multi-Stakeholder World
    Malsch, Ineke
    [J]. NANOETHICS, 2013, 7 (02) : 161 - 172
  • [46] Multi-stakeholder microgrids for resilience and sustainability
    Bird, Stephen
    Hotaling, Chelsea
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2017, 16 (02): : 116 - 132
  • [47] A Multi-Stakeholder Co-Design Approach to Making Strategies for Community Development Harnessing Emerging Technologies
    Lainfiesta, Maximiliano
    Zhang, Xuewei
    Zhang, Peichong
    [J]. 2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY (ISTAS), 2019,
  • [48] Supporting multi-stakeholder environmental decisions
    Hajkowicz, Stefan A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 88 (04) : 607 - 614
  • [49] Intelligent multi-stakeholder environmental management
    Mianabadi, Hojat
    Afshar, Abbas
    Zarghami, Mandi
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (01) : 862 - 866
  • [50] MULTI-STAKEHOLDER DIPLOMACY IN THE SPIRIT OF GENEVA
    Lamb, Christopher
    [J]. REFUGEE SURVEY QUARTERLY, 2007, 26 (04) : 56 - 61