Machine learning in the clinical and language characterisation of primary progressive aphasia variants

被引:29
|
作者
Matias-Guiu, Jordi A. [1 ]
Diaz-Alvarez, Josefa [2 ]
Cuetos, Fernando [3 ,4 ]
Nieves Cabrera-Martin, Maria [5 ]
Segovia-Rios, Ignacio [2 ]
Pytel, Vanesa [1 ]
Moreno-Ramos, Teresa [1 ]
Carreras, Jose L. [5 ]
Matias-Guiu, Jorge [1 ]
Ayala, Jose L. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense, Hosp Clin San Carlos, San Carlos Res Hlth Inst IdISSC, Dept Neurol, Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Extremadura, Ctr Univ Merida, Dept Comp Architecture & Commun, Merida, Spain
[3] Univ Oviedo, Dept Psychol, Oviedo, Spain
[4] Univ Malaga, Dept Psychol, Malaga, Spain
[5] Univ Complutense, Hosp Clin San Carlos, San Carlos Res Hlth Inst IdISSC, Dept Nucl Med, Madrid, Spain
[6] Univ Complutense, Dept Comp Architecture & Automat, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Primary progressive aphasia; Apraxia of speech; Positron emission tomography; Neuropsychological assessment; CONSENSUS CRITERIA; APRAXIA; CLASSIFICATION; SPEECH; DIAGNOSIS; PATHOLOGY; SUBTYPES;
D O I
10.1016/j.cortex.2019.05.007
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Introduction: Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a clinical syndrome of neurodegenerative origin with 3 main variants: non-fluent, semantic, and logopenic. However, there is some controversy about the existence of additional subtypes. Our aim was to study the language and cognitive features associated with a new proposed classification for PPA. Material and methods: Sixty-eight patients with PPA in early stages of the disease and 20 healthy controls were assessed with a comprehensive language and cognitive protocol. They were also evaluated with F-18-FDG positron emision tomography (PET). Patients were classified according to FDG PET regional metabolism, using our previously developed algorithm based on a hierarchical agglomerative cluster analysis with Ward's linkage method. Five variants were found, with both the non-fluent and logopenic variants being split into 2 subtypes. Machine learning techniques were used to predict each variant according to language assessment results. Results: Non-fluent type 1 was associated with poorer performance in repetition of sentences and reading of irregular words than non-fluent type 2. Conversely, the second group showed a higher degree of apraxia of speech. Patients with logopenic variant type 1 performed more poorly on action naming than patients with logopenic type 2. Language assessments were predictive of PET-based subtypes in 86%-89% of cases using clustering analysis and principal components analysis. Conclusions: Our study supports the existence of 5 variants of PPA. These variants show some differences in language and FDG PET imaging characteristics. Machine learning algorithms using language test data were able to predict each of the 5 PPA variants with a relatively high degree of accuracy, and enable the possibility of automated, machine-aided diagnosis of PPA variants. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:312 / 323
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Characterization of language in the linguistic variants of Primary Progressive Aphasia
    Perez Lancho, Ma Cruz
    Garcia Bercianos, Sergio
    [J]. REVISTA SIGNOS, 2020, 53 (102): : 198 - 218
  • [2] Primary progressive aphasia: Linguistic patterns and clinical variants
    Silveri, Maria Caterina
    Pravata, Emanuele
    Brita, Anna Clelia
    Improta, Erika
    Ciccarelli, Nicoletta
    Rossi, Paola
    Colosimo, Cesare
    [J]. BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2014, 135 : 57 - 65
  • [3] Automated analysis of written language in the three variants of primary progressive aphasia
    Josephy-Hernandez, Sylvia
    Rezaii, Neguine
    Jones, Amelia
    Loyer, Emmaleigh
    Hochberg, Daisy
    Quimby, Megan
    Wong, Bonnie
    Dickerson, Bradford C.
    [J]. BRAIN COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 5 (04)
  • [4] Handedness and language learning disability differentially distribute in progressive aphasia variants
    Miller, Zachary A.
    Mandelli, Maria Luisa
    Rankin, Katherine P.
    Henry, Maya L.
    Babiak, Miranda C.
    Frazier, Darvis T.
    Lobach, Iryna V.
    Bettcher, Brianne M.
    Wu, Teresa Q.
    Rabinovici, Gil D.
    Graff-Radford, Neill R.
    Miller, Bruce L.
    Gorno-Tempini, Maria Luisa
    [J]. BRAIN, 2013, 136 : 3461 - 3473
  • [5] In vivo correlates of pathological diagnosis in clinical variants of primary progressive aphasia
    Spinelli, E. G.
    Mandelli, M. L.
    Santos, M.
    Wilson, S. M.
    Agosta, F.
    Trojanowski, J. Q.
    Huang, E. J.
    Grinberg, L. T.
    Filippi, M.
    Miller, B. L.
    Seeley, W. W.
    Gorno-Tempini, M. L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY, 2016, 138 : 238 - 239
  • [6] Language disorders of a primary progressive aphasia
    Dong, K.
    Zhang, Y.
    Wei, N.
    Zhao, X.
    Wang, Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2007, 254 : 175 - 175
  • [7] Explainable machine learning radiomics model for Primary Progressive Aphasia classification
    Tafuri, Benedetta
    De Blasi, Roberto
    Nigro, Salvatore
    Logroscino, Giancarlo
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SYSTEMS NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 18
  • [8] Linguistic profiles of variants of primary progressive aphasia
    Gonzalez, Rafael
    Rojas, Macarena
    Rosselli, Monica
    Ardila, Alfredo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2022, 97
  • [9] An overview on Primary Progressive Aphasia and its variants
    Amici, Serena
    Gorno-Tempini, Maria Luisa
    Ogar, Jennifer M.
    Dronkers, Nina F.
    Miller, Bruce L.
    [J]. BEHAVIOURAL NEUROLOGY, 2006, 17 (02) : 77 - 87
  • [10] Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants
    Gorno-Tempini, M. L.
    Hillis, A. E.
    Weintraub, S.
    Kertesz, A.
    Mendez, M.
    Cappa, S. F.
    Ogar, J. M.
    Rohrer, J. D.
    Black, S.
    Boeve, B. F.
    Manes, F.
    Dronkers, N. F.
    Vandenberghe, R.
    Rascovsky, K.
    Patterson, K.
    Miller, B. L.
    Knopman, D. S.
    Hodges, J. R.
    Mesulam, M. M.
    Grossman, M.
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2011, 76 (11) : 1006 - 1014