Seismic Reassessment of the Leaning Tower of Pisa: Dynamic Monitoring, Site Response, and SSI

被引:12
|
作者
Fiorentino, Gabriele [1 ]
Quaranta, Giuseppe [2 ]
Mylonakis, George [3 ,4 ,5 ]
lavorato, Davide [1 ]
Pagliaroli, Alessandro [6 ]
Carlucci, Giorgia [7 ]
Sabetta, Fabio [8 ]
Della Monica, Giuseppe [7 ]
Lanzo, Giuseppe [2 ]
Aprile, Victoria [6 ]
Marano, Giuseppe Carlo [6 ,8 ,9 ]
Briseghella, Bruno [8 ]
Monti, Giorgio [2 ,10 ]
Squeglia, Nunziante [11 ]
Bartelletti, Raffaello [11 ]
Nuti, Camillo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Roma Tre Univ, Dept Architecture, Rome, Italy
[2] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Struct & Geotech Engn, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Bristol, Dept Civil Engn, Bristol, Avon, England
[4] Univ Patras, Dept Civil Engn, Patras, Greece
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] Univ G dAnnunzio, Dept Engn & Geol, Pescara, Italy
[7] Roma Tre Univ, Dept Sci, Rome, Italy
[8] Fuzhou Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Fuzhou, Fujian, Peoples R China
[9] Tech Univ Bari, Dept Sci Civil Engn & Architecture, Bari, Italy
[10] Nanjing Tech Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[11] Univ Pisa, Dept Civil & Ind Engn, Pisa, Italy
关键词
SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION; GROUND-MOTION; SYSTEM-IDENTIFICATION; HAZARD; BUILDINGS; ALGORITHM; PREDICTION; INVERSION; FOOTINGS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1193/021518EQS037M
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The Tower of Pisa survived several strong earthquakes undamaged over the last 650 years, despite its leaning and limited strength and ductility. No credible explanation for its remarkable seismic performance exists to date. A reassessment of this unique case history in light of new seismological, geological, structural, and geotechnical information is reported, aiming to address this question. The following topics are discussed: (1) dynamic structural identification based on recorded earthquake data; (2) geophysical site characterization using a two-dimensional array; (3) seismic hazard and site response analysis considering horizontal and vertical motions; and (4) soil-structure interaction (SSI) analysis calibrated using lab and field data. A substantial shift in natural period, from about 0.35 s to over 1 s (a threefold increase, the largest known for a building of that height) caused by SSI, a wave parameter (1/sigma) of about 0.3, and a minor effect of vertical ground motion are identified and may explain the lack of earthquake damage on the Tower. Recommendations for future research, including the need to establish a seismic bedrock deeper than 500 m, are provided.
引用
收藏
页码:703 / 736
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Report on Upgraded Seismic Monitoring Stations in Myanmar: Station Performance and Site Response
    Thiam, Hrin Nei
    Htwe, Yin Myo Min
    Kyaw, Tun Lin
    Tun, Pa Pa
    Min, Zaw
    Htwe, Su Hninn
    Aung, Tin Myo
    Lin, Kyaw Kyaw
    Aung, Myat Min
    de Cristofaro, Jason
    Franke, M.
    Radman, S.
    Lepiten, E.
    Wolin, Emily
    Hough, Susan E.
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2017, 88 (03) : 926 - 934
  • [22] Dynamic response analysis of engineering site with islands under seismic wave loading
    High Performance Computing Center, Shanghai Jiaotong Univ., Shanghai 200240, China
    不详
    Xitong Fangzhen Xuebao, 2008, 1 (173-177):
  • [23] Identification of dynamic soil parameters for seismic site response of vertical ground motion
    Miyajima, M
    Kitaura, M
    Zhai, ED
    COMPUTER METHODS AND ADVANCES IN GEOMECHANICS, VOL 1, 1997, : 363 - 368
  • [24] Dynamic response of hyperbolic cooling tower considering different column supporting systems subjected to seismic actions
    Ziraoui, Adil
    Kissi, Benaissa
    Aaya, Hassan
    Ahnouz, Imane
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2024, 429
  • [25] Dynamic Characteristics and Seismic Response of Multi-Story Wooden Tower Considering the Influence of a High Stylobate
    Xue, Hao
    Xue, Jianyang
    Song, Dejun
    Li, Mengjie
    Xue, Bowen
    Wu, Chenwei
    Sui, Yan
    BUILDINGS, 2025, 15 (02)
  • [26] Dynamic Response of Anchored Tower Cranes under Sinusoidal Damped Seismic Action. Case Study
    Alamoreanu, Mircea
    Vasilescu, Andrei
    ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF ACOUSTICS AND VIBRATION, 2014, 11 (01): : 3 - 10
  • [27] Monitoring the structural dynamic response of a masonry tower: comparing classical and time-frequency analyses
    Rocco Ditommaso
    Marco Mucciarelli
    Stefano Parolai
    Matteo Picozzi
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2012, 10 : 1221 - 1235
  • [28] Monitoring the structural dynamic response of a masonry tower: comparing classical and time-frequency analyses
    Ditommaso, Rocco
    Mucciarelli, Marco
    Parolai, Stefano
    Picozzi, Matteo
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2012, 10 (04) : 1221 - 1235
  • [29] Seismic characterization and dynamic site response of a municipal solid waste landfill in Bangalore, India
    Anbazhagan, P.
    SivakumarBabu, G. L.
    Lakshmikanthan, P.
    VivekAnand, K. S.
    WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2016, 34 (03) : 205 - 213
  • [30] Assessment of dynamic site response of the peat deposits at an industrial site (Turkey) and comparison with some seismic design codes
    Ozcan, N. Tunar
    Ulusay, R.
    Isik, N. S.
    BULLETIN OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 78 (04) : 2215 - 2235