A robust algorithm for project portfolio selection problem using real options valuation

被引:12
|
作者
Montajabiha, Mahsa [1 ]
Khamseh, Alireza Arshadi [2 ]
Afshar-Nadjafi, Behrouz [3 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Young Researchers & Elite Club, Qazvin Branch, Qazvin, Iran
[2] Kharazmi Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Ind Engn, Tehran, Iran
[3] Islamic Azad Univ, Qazvin Branch, Fac Ind & Mech Engn, Dept Ind Engn, Qazvin, Iran
关键词
Uncertainty; Robust optimization; Research and development; Integer programming; N-fold compound options; Project portfolio selection; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; COMPOUND OPTION; OPTIMIZATION; MODEL; INVESTMENTS; FRAMEWORK; SECTOR; POLICY;
D O I
10.1108/IJMPB-12-2015-0114
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The principal concern of organization managers in the global rivalry of commerce environment is how to select the project portfolio among available projects. In this matter, organizations should consider the uncertainty intrinsic in the projects regarding an appropriate valuation technique within an optimization framework. In this research, the purpose of this paper is to formulate using a robust optimization algorithm to deal with the complexities and uncertainty inherent in the construction of the project portfolio. Design/methodology/approach - First, a general mathematical formulation is presented, which in compound real options valuation is highlighted. This formulation gives managerial flexibility by correcting the deficiency of traditional discounted cash flow technique that excludes any form of flexibility. Then, considering a limitation on budget of the organization, an integer programming formulation to maximize the n-fold compound options for project portfolio selection is proposed. Finally, a robust optimization model is developed along with the robust combinatorial optimization algorithm, which is effective for solving problems under uncertainty. Findings - Sensitivity analysis showed that projects in later phases of development, having survived several phases of pre-clinical and clinical tests, are worth more because they are more likely to pertain to business. However, the investment costs related to each project during development phases limit the number of projects that a company can bring to their final portfolio. Additionally, the analysis of conservatism level represented how project managers can quite easily determine their risk attitude and the corresponding portfolio composition. From a managerial point of view, the proposed framework is very useful because it requires only financial estimates. Hence, the proposed decision support tool can assist research and development (R&D) project managers in the pharmaceutical industry for making decisions. Originality/value - The first is the application of the n-fold compound options on portfolio of R&D projects and the employment of compound options value of a project portfolio as an objective function. The second one is a mathematical formulation of these concepts and solving it by the robust combinatorial optimization algorithm. The literature is lacking in the application of the robust combinatorial optimization algorithm to R&D project portfolio selection based on the generalized n-fold compound option model of Cassimon et al. (2004). Every framework from calculation of the n-fold compound option to solving robust combinatorial algorithm is programmed in Matlab software, since it can be used as a business support tool.
引用
收藏
页码:386 / 403
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A genetic algorithm for military project portfolio optimization problem
    Yang, Sang-Chin
    Chang, Tun-Jen
    Lin, Ting-Li
    Chang, Kuang-Jung
    [J]. Chung Cheng Ling Hsueh Pao/Journal of Chung Cheng Institute of Technology, 2009, 38 (01): : 1 - 16
  • [42] Project portfolio selection via harmony search algorithm and modern portfolio theory
    Esfahani, Hamed Nasr
    Sobhiyah, Mohammad Hossein
    Yousefi, Vahid Reza
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 29TH IPMA WORLD CONGRESS WC2015, 2016, 226 : 51 - 58
  • [43] Customer lifetime valuation using real options analysis
    Koosha H.
    Albadvi A.
    [J]. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 2015, 3 (3) : 122 - 134
  • [44] Valuation of patent right using real options approach
    Hongfeng Peng
    Huijun Wang
    [J]. Sixth Wuhan International Conference on E-Business, Vols 1-4: MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES IN A GLOBAL WORLD, 2007, : 2851 - 2857
  • [45] Project Portfolio Selection Using Interactive Approach
    Nowak, Maciej
    [J]. MODERN BUILDING MATERIALS, STRUCTURES AND TECHNIQUES, 2013, 57 : 814 - 822
  • [46] Algorithm portfolio selection as a bandit problem with unbounded losses
    Gagliolo, Matteo
    Schmidhuber, Jurgen
    [J]. ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2011, 61 (02) : 49 - 86
  • [47] Algorithm portfolio selection as a bandit problem with unbounded losses
    Matteo Gagliolo
    Jürgen Schmidhuber
    [J]. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 2011, 61 : 49 - 86
  • [48] SIMPLE ALGORITHM FOR STONES VERSION OF PORTFOLIO SELECTION PROBLEM
    JUCKER, JV
    FARO, CD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 1975, 10 (05) : 859 - 870
  • [49] Expanded models of the project portfolio selection problem with learning effect
    Wang, Li
    Li, Xingmei
    Zhao, Lu
    Liu, Zailing
    [J]. CAAI TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 4 (03) : 142 - 147
  • [50] REAL OPTIONS VALUATION MODEL OF LINE EXPANSION PROBLEM IN THE AMOLED INDUSTRY
    Lee, Su-Jung
    Kim, Dohoon
    [J]. MARKETING AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCES, 2008, : 191 - +