A robust algorithm for project portfolio selection problem using real options valuation

被引:12
|
作者
Montajabiha, Mahsa [1 ]
Khamseh, Alireza Arshadi [2 ]
Afshar-Nadjafi, Behrouz [3 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Young Researchers & Elite Club, Qazvin Branch, Qazvin, Iran
[2] Kharazmi Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Ind Engn, Tehran, Iran
[3] Islamic Azad Univ, Qazvin Branch, Fac Ind & Mech Engn, Dept Ind Engn, Qazvin, Iran
关键词
Uncertainty; Robust optimization; Research and development; Integer programming; N-fold compound options; Project portfolio selection; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; COMPOUND OPTION; OPTIMIZATION; MODEL; INVESTMENTS; FRAMEWORK; SECTOR; POLICY;
D O I
10.1108/IJMPB-12-2015-0114
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The principal concern of organization managers in the global rivalry of commerce environment is how to select the project portfolio among available projects. In this matter, organizations should consider the uncertainty intrinsic in the projects regarding an appropriate valuation technique within an optimization framework. In this research, the purpose of this paper is to formulate using a robust optimization algorithm to deal with the complexities and uncertainty inherent in the construction of the project portfolio. Design/methodology/approach - First, a general mathematical formulation is presented, which in compound real options valuation is highlighted. This formulation gives managerial flexibility by correcting the deficiency of traditional discounted cash flow technique that excludes any form of flexibility. Then, considering a limitation on budget of the organization, an integer programming formulation to maximize the n-fold compound options for project portfolio selection is proposed. Finally, a robust optimization model is developed along with the robust combinatorial optimization algorithm, which is effective for solving problems under uncertainty. Findings - Sensitivity analysis showed that projects in later phases of development, having survived several phases of pre-clinical and clinical tests, are worth more because they are more likely to pertain to business. However, the investment costs related to each project during development phases limit the number of projects that a company can bring to their final portfolio. Additionally, the analysis of conservatism level represented how project managers can quite easily determine their risk attitude and the corresponding portfolio composition. From a managerial point of view, the proposed framework is very useful because it requires only financial estimates. Hence, the proposed decision support tool can assist research and development (R&D) project managers in the pharmaceutical industry for making decisions. Originality/value - The first is the application of the n-fold compound options on portfolio of R&D projects and the employment of compound options value of a project portfolio as an objective function. The second one is a mathematical formulation of these concepts and solving it by the robust combinatorial optimization algorithm. The literature is lacking in the application of the robust combinatorial optimization algorithm to R&D project portfolio selection based on the generalized n-fold compound option model of Cassimon et al. (2004). Every framework from calculation of the n-fold compound option to solving robust combinatorial algorithm is programmed in Matlab software, since it can be used as a business support tool.
引用
收藏
页码:386 / 403
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Application of Real Options in Project Portfolio Selection
    Wang, Chengchao
    Shou, Yongyi
    [J]. 2011 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM), 2011, : 848 - 853
  • [2] Valuation of Project Using Game Theory and Real Options
    Kralovic, Petr
    [J]. MANAGING AND MODELLING OF FINANCIAL RISKS: 7TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE, PTS I-III, 2014, : 404 - 410
  • [3] A fuzzy set approach for R&D portfolio selection using a real options valuation model
    Wang, Juite
    Hwang, W. -L.
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 35 (03): : 247 - 257
  • [4] USE OF REAL OPTIONS IN PROJECT VALUATION
    Petravicius, Tomas
    [J]. TRANSFORMATIONS IN BUSINESS & ECONOMICS, 2009, 8 (03): : 69 - 89
  • [5] Investment project valuation using a fuzzy real options approach
    Liao, Shu-Hsien
    Ho, Shiu-Hwei
    [J]. NEW ASPECTS OF SYSTEMS THEORY AND SCIENTIFIC COMPUTATION, 2010, : 172 - +
  • [6] Valuation and Selection of OSS with Real Options
    Mavridis, Androklis
    [J]. ADVANCED INFORMATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING WORKSHOPS, 2014, 178 : 44 - 52
  • [7] A generalized fuzzy optimization framework for R&D project selection using real options valuation
    Karsak, EE
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS - ICCSA 2006, PT 3, 2006, 3982 : 918 - 927
  • [8] Fuzzy multicriteria R&D project selection with a real options valuation model
    Tolga, A. Cagri
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2008, 19 (4-5) : 359 - 371
  • [9] Real Options Valuation of a Federally Funded Small Business Portfolio
    Belz, Andrea
    [J]. 2017 IEEE TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT SOCIETY CONFERENCE (TEMSCON), 2017, : 19 - 24
  • [10] The real options as a valuation methodology for a project in the electrical sector
    Tamara Ayus, Armando Lenin
    Forero Corrales, Julian
    Gil Osorio, Isabella
    Almonacid Hurtado, Paula Maria
    [J]. ECOS DE ECONOMIA, 2019, 23 (48): : 62 - 79