Lateral intertransverse process single-level fusion for salvage of the unstable failed posterior lumbar interbody fusion

被引:0
|
作者
Highhouse, ME [1 ]
Schultz, RT [1 ]
Dall, BE [1 ]
机构
[1] MICHIGAN STATE UNIV,KALAMAZOO CTR MED STUDIES,DEPT ORTHOPAED,KALAMAZOO,MI
来源
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS | 1996年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
lateral; intertransverse; floating fusion; failed posterior lumbar interbody fusion; graft extrusion; external immobilization;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Our study was an attempt to salvage severely unstable posterior lumbar interbody fusions (PLIFs) by using the lateral bilateral intertransverse single-level (floating) fusion. A retrospective review of six patients with failed L4-L5 PLIFs was carried out. These patients underwent reoperation between 2 weeks and 2 years after the initial surgery. All patients had persistent symptoms, including low back pain and sciatica, interfering with activities of daily living. Computed tomography (CT) scans revealed extrusion of the bone plug into the spinal canal in five patients. All six had a nonunion of the PLIF, and three patients had grade 3 or 4 iatrogenic spondylolisthesis caused by the PLIF. The operation involved decompression followed by lateral intertransverse process fusion with autogenous bone graft. All patients were placed in external immobilization after the procedure for 3 months. Follow-up averaged 38.5 months (range, 21-55), at which time five had substantial pain improvement. Five were radiographically fused. One had a second nonunion, which subsequently healed after reoperation with repeat lateral fusion and Luque plate hardware. Our fusion rate was 83% without the use of instrumentation. In conclusion, we recommend the simplistic procedure of lateral bilateral intertransverse process single-level fusion along with liberal external immobilization for the difficult problem of salvage of failed PLIFs.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 63
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Comparative Study of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Pawar, Abhijit Y.
    Hughes, Alexander P.
    Sama, Andrew A.
    Girardi, Federico P.
    Lebl, Darren R.
    Cammisa, Frank P.
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 9 (05) : 668 - 674
  • [22] Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion/Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion) versus Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery in Spinal Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review
    Bamps, Sven
    Raymaekers, Vincent
    Roosen, Gert
    Put, Eric
    Vanvolsem, Steven
    Achahbar, Salah-Eddine
    Meeuws, Sacha
    Wissels, Maarten
    Plazier, Mark
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 171 : 10 - 18
  • [23] Salvage Strategy for Failed Spinal Fusion Surgery Using Lumbar Lateral Interbody Fusion technique: A Technical Note
    Orita, Sumihisa
    Nakajima, Takao
    Konno, Kenta
    Inage, Kazuhide
    Sainoh, Takeshi
    Fujimoto, Kazuki
    Sato, Jun
    Shiga, Yasuhiro
    Kanamoto, Hirohito
    Abe, Koki
    Inoue, Masahiro
    Kinoshita, Hideyuki
    Norimoto, Masaki
    Umimura, Tomotaka
    Aoki, Yasuchika
    Nakamura, Junichi
    Matsuura, Yusuke
    Kubota, Go
    Eguchi, Yawara
    Hynes, Richard A.
    Akazawa, Tsutomu
    Suzuki, Miyako
    Takahashi, Kazuhisa
    Ohtori, Seiji
    SPINE SURGERY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2018, 2 (01):
  • [24] The impact of generalized joint laxity on the clinical and radiological outcomes of single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Lee, Sun-Mi
    Lee, Gun Woo
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 15 (05): : 809 - 816
  • [25] When to remove? Evaluation of postoperative drainage volume after single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Egenolf, Philipp
    Lenz, Maximilian
    Schnake, Klaus John
    Harland, Arne
    Oikonomidis, Stavros
    Eysel, Peer
    Scheyerer, Max Joseph
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2023, 37 : 1 - 4
  • [26] Postoperative Opioid Use Following Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared with Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion
    Toci, Gregory R.
    Lambrechts, Mark J.
    Heard, Jeremy C.
    Karamian, Brian A.
    Siegel, Nicholas M.
    Carter, Michael, V
    Curran, John G.
    Canseco, Jose A.
    Kaye, I. David
    Woods, Barrett, I
    Hilibrand, Alan S.
    Kepler, Christopher K.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Schroeder, Gregory D.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 165 : E546 - E554
  • [27] Postoperative Opioid Use Following Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared with Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion
    Toci, Gregory R.
    Lambrechts, Mark J.
    Heard, Jeremy C.
    Karamian, Brian A.
    Siegel, Nicholas M.
    V. Carter, Michael
    Curran, John G.
    Canseco, Jose A.
    Kaye, I. David
    Woods, Barrett I.
    Hilibrand, Alan S.
    Kepler, Christopher K.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Schroeder, Gregory D.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 165 : E546 - E554
  • [28] Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Posterior Instrumentation at L5/S1
    Jacob, Kevin C.
    Patel, Madhav R.
    Ribot, Max A.
    Parsons, Alexander W.
    Vanjani, Nisheka N.
    Pawlowski, Hanna
    Prabhu, Michael C.
    Singh, Kern
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 157 : E111 - E122
  • [29] Effects of Total Psoas Area Index on Surgical Outcomes of Single-Level Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Jung, Jong-myung
    Chung, Chun Kee
    Kim, Chi Heon
    Yang, Seung Heon
    Won, Young Ii
    Choi, Yunhee
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 154 : E838 - E845
  • [30] Single-level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Surgical Treatment of Isthmic Spondylolisthesis
    Patel, Madhav R.
    Jacob, Kevin C.
    Pawlowski, Hanna
    Prabhu, Michael C.
    Vanjani, Nisheka N.
    Singh, Kern
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2022, 30 (21) : E1382 - E1390