Assessing the adequacy of structural equation models: Golden rules and editorial policies

被引：62

作者：

Goffin, Richard D. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Psychol, Social Sci Ctr, London, ON N6A 5C2, Canada

来源：

PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES | 2007年 / 42卷 / 05期

关键词：

Structural Equation Modeling; goodness of fit indices; assessment of fit; chi-square; partial least squares;

D O I：

10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.019

中图分类号：

B84 [心理学];

学科分类号：

04 ; 0402 ;

摘要：

Recommendations for enhancing the present journal's editorial policy with regards to the publication of Structural Equation Modeling (SEMing) studies have been provided in Barrett (2007). Wisely, these recommendations oppose strict reliance on "cut-off' values that have been proposed for well-known Approximate Fit Indices (AFIs). However, the present article critically evaluates other aspects of the recommended editorial policy in light of recent literature and finds a number of weaknesses: AFIs are ignored altogether, predictive accuracy suggestions do not take advantage of the SEMing literature, the chi-square test is overemphasized, power in SEMing analyses is underemphasized, and a number of important aspects of model assessment are not considered. Suggestions for a more comprehensive editorial policy regarding SEMing articles are provided. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：831 / 839

页数：9

共 50 条

[1] Two Rules of Identification for Structural Equation Models
Bollen, Kenneth A.
Davis, Walter R.
[J]. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2009, 16 (03) : 523 - 536
[2] Assessing Employees' Satisfaction by Structural Equation Models
Shi Yan
Wang Xingyuan
[J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOLS A-C, 2008, : 1181 - 1186
[3] GOLDEN RULES FOR EDUCATION MODELS
KULIKOWSKI, R
[J]. BULLETIN DE L ACADEMIE POLONAISE DES SCIENCES-SERIE DES SCIENCES TECHNIQUES, 1976, 24 (11): : 887 - 893
[4] Assessing the Size of Model Misfit in Structural Equation Models
Alberto Maydeu-Olivares
[J]. Psychometrika, 2017, 82 : 533 - 558
[5] Assessing the Size of Model Misfit in Structural Equation Models
Maydeu-Olivares, Alberto
[J]. PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2017, 82 (03) : 533 - 558
[6] Graphics for assessing the adequacy of regression models
Cook, RD
Weisberg, S
[J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 92 (438) : 490 - 499
[7] The golden rule is that there are no golden rules *: A commentary on Paul Barrett's recommendations for reporting model fit in structural equation modelling
Markland, David
[J]. PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2007, 42 (05) : 851 - 858
[8] A graphical method for assessing the identification of linear structural equation models
Eusebi, Paolo
[J]. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2008, 15 (03) : 403 - 412
[9] Assessing the structural adequacy of alternative ecohydrological models using a pattern-oriented approach
Arnold, S.
Attinger, S.
Frank, K.
Hildebrandt, A.
[J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2015, 316 : 52 - 61
[10] Assessing the Fit of Structural Equation Models With Multiply Imputed Data
Enders, Craig K.
Mansolf, Maxwell
[J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2018, 23 (01) : 76 - 93

← 1 2 3 4 5 →