Single bolus of midazolam versus bolus midazolam plus meperidine for colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial

被引:22
|
作者
Radaelli, F [1 ]
Meucci, G [1 ]
Terruzzi, V [1 ]
Spinzi, G [1 ]
Imperiali, G [1 ]
Strocchi, E [1 ]
Lenoci, N [1 ]
Terreni, N [1 ]
Mandelli, G [1 ]
Minoli, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Osped Valduce, Div Gastroenterol, I-22100 Como, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mge.2003.104
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to determine whether a single bolus of meperidine in addition to midazolam improves patient tolerance during colonoscopy. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy were randomly assigned in double-blind fashion to receive a single rapid intravenous bolus of 5 mg of midazolam and placebo (Group A, n = 125) or 5 mg midazolam plus 50 mg meperidine (Group B, n = 128). Tolerance (4-point scale: 1 excellent, 4 unbearable), pain (4-point scale: 1 none, 4 severe) and willingness to undergo another colonoscopy were assessed 24 to 48 hours later in a telephone interview conducted by an independent observer blinded to the regimen of sedative medication. Results: Significantly more patients in Group A reported moderate or severe pain (28% vs. 9%; p < 0.001), poor or unbearable tolerance (18% vs. 6%; p < 0.01) and unwillingness to undergo colonoscopy again in the future (14% vs. 5%; p < 0.05). By multivariate analysis, randomization to the midazolam group and younger age were the only variables independently associated with the risk of reporting at least one of these outcomes. Recovery time, frequency of oxygen desaturation, and need for supplemental oxygen were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Conclusions: The addition of a single bolus of meperidine to midazolam improves patient tolerance and lessens pain during colonoscopy without significantly increasing the frequency of side effects or prolonging recovery time.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 335
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of bolus remifentanil versus bolus fentanyl for blunting cardiovascular intubation responses in children: a randomized, double-blind study
    Yang Quan-yong
    Xue Fu-shan
    Liao Xu
    Liu He-ping
    Luo Mao-ping
    Xu Ya-chao
    Liu Yi
    Zhang Yan-ming
    [J]. CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 122 (01) : 44 - 50
  • [42] Oral ketamine and midazolam for pediatric burn patients: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study
    Norambuena, Claudia
    Yanez, Jaqueline
    Flores, Viviana
    Puentes, Pamela
    Carrasco, Patricia
    Villena, Rodolfo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2013, 48 (03) : 629 - 634
  • [43] Safety and efficacy of etomidate/midazolam and propofol/midazolam sedations for screening colonoscopy: A prospective, randomized controlled trial
    Lee, Jung Min
    Choi, Seong Ji
    Jeon, Han Jo
    Jang, Sehyun
    Kim, Seung Han
    Lee, Jae Min
    Choi, Hyuk Soon
    Kim, Eun Sun
    Keum, Bora
    Jeen, Yoon Tae
    Chun, Hoon Jai
    Lee, Hong Sik
    Kim, Chang Duck
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 33 : 255 - 255
  • [44] KETOROLAC VERSUS MEPERIDINE AND HYDROXYZINE IN THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE MIGRAINE HEADACHE - A RANDOMIZED, PROSPECTIVE, DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL
    DUARTE, C
    DUNAWAY, F
    TURNER, L
    ALDAG, J
    FREDERICK, R
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1992, 21 (09) : 1116 - 1121
  • [45] A randomized double-blind trial of chloral hydrate/hydroxyzine versus midazolam/acetaminophen in the sedation of pediatric dental outpatients
    Reeves, ST
    Wiedenfeld, KR
    Wrobleski, J
    Hardin, CL
    Pinosky, ML
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN, 1996, 63 (02): : 95 - &
  • [46] PREMEDICATION FOR PTA - DOUBLE-BLIND AND RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF MIDAZOLAM TRAMADOL VERSUS PLACEBO TRAMADOL
    ALFKE, H
    REUTER, P
    WAGNER, HJ
    BOHME, K
    [J]. FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIETE DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER NEUEN BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 1993, 159 (05): : 461 - 466
  • [47] Efficacy of intranasal ketamine and midazolam for pediatric sedation: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial
    Khoshrang, Hossein
    Alavi, Cyrus Emir
    Rimaz, Siamak
    Mirmansouri, Ali
    Farzi, Farnoush
    Biazar, Gelareh
    Atrkarroushan, Zahra
    Khadem, Nazanin Sabet
    [J]. CASPIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 12 (04) : 539 - 543
  • [48] A prospective, single blind, randomized trial of non-anesthetist administered propofol versus midazolam/meperidine for ERCP sedation: Satisfaction and post ERCP recovery profile
    Kongkam, P
    Rerknimitr, R
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 61 (05) : AB117 - AB117
  • [49] Continuous infusion versus bolus administration of steroids in severe attacks of ulcerative colitis:: A randomized, double-blind trial
    Bossa, Fabrizio
    Fiorella, Serafina
    Caruso, Nazario
    Accadia, Laura
    Napolitano, Grazia
    Valvano, Maria Rosa
    Andriulli, Angelo
    Annese, Vito
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 102 (03): : 601 - 608
  • [50] Sedation and use of analgesics in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a double-blind comparison study of meperidine/midazolam, remifentanil/midazolam, and remifentanil alone
    Zhang, Jinhua
    Huang, Yong
    Li, Zhao
    Li, Jian
    Liu, Kunpeng
    Li, Chenghui
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 54 (11) : 872 - 879