An improved multi-criteria emergency decision-making method in environmental disasters

被引:24
|
作者
Jiang, Guang-Jun [1 ]
Chen, Hong-Xia [1 ]
Sun, Hong-Hua [1 ]
Yazdi, Mohammad [2 ]
Nedjati, Arman [3 ]
Adesina, Kehinde Adewale [4 ]
机构
[1] Inner Mongolia Univ Technol, Sch Mech Engn, Hohhot 010051, Inner Mongolia, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Intelligent Syst Engn, Guangzhou 510275, Peoples R China
[3] Quchan Univ Technol, Ind Engn Dept, Quchan, Iran
[4] Near East Univ, Ind Engn Dept, Via Mersin 10, Lefkosia, North Cyprus, Turkey
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Multi-criteria decision making; TOPSIS; Pythagorean fuzzy set; Chebyshev distance measure; Structural safety and reliability; Environmental clean prospective; OF-THE-ART; FUZZY TOPSIS; SUPPLIER SELECTION; RISK-ASSESSMENT; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; MCDM; CRITERIA; SAFETY; DEMATEL; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1007/s00500-021-05826-x
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods deeply assist decision-makers in evaluating and analyzing input data as accurately as possible in the area of safety and reliability. The Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) can be used to rank a set of alternatives based on the different types of criteria. However, this method still needs to be improved; fuzzy set theory and its corresponding extensions are bold in the line of TOPSIS improvement. In this study, the original form of TOPSIS method is extended using Pythagorean fuzzy-based Chebyshev distance measures. Pythagorean fuzzy set has better reflection compared to the conventional fuzzy set theory and Chebyshev distance measures can provide more accurate results, which are used to compute the separation measures in the TOPSIS method. Therefore, the novel improved TOPSIS methods have been developed underlying the ideal of Pythagorean fuzzy-based Chebyshev distance measures. The developed method is applied on a humanitarian case-study to show the efficiency of the approach in an emergency response situation. Results show that the proposed method is efficiently applicable in real-life decision-making situations.
引用
收藏
页码:10351 / 10379
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making with Linguistic Labels
    Mieszkowicz-Rolka, Alicja
    Rolka, Leszek
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 17TH CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS (FEDCSIS), 2022, : 263 - 267
  • [22] Multi-criteria Decision-making in Urban Planning
    Kilnarova, Pavla
    [J]. 6TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM, 2017, : 94 - 100
  • [23] A Fuzzy Linguistic Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach to Assess Emergency Suppliers
    Li, Huilin
    Yang, Jiaqi
    Xiang, Ziquan
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (20)
  • [24] Emergency logistics centers site selection by multi-criteria decision-making and GIS
    Feng, Zengxi
    Li, Gangting
    Wang, Wenjing
    Zhang, Lutong
    Xiang, Weipeng
    He, Xin
    Zhang, Maoqiang
    Wei, Na
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2023, 96
  • [26] An interactive multi-criteria decision-making method for building performance design
    Han, Zhen
    Li, Xiaoqian
    Sun, Jiaqi
    Wang, Mo
    Liu, Gang
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2023, 282
  • [27] The vital-immaterial-mediocre multi-criteria decision-making method
    Zakeri, Shervin
    Ecer, Fatih
    Konstantas, Dimitri
    Cheikhrouhou, Naoufel
    [J]. KYBERNETES, 2023, 52 (03) : 937 - 963
  • [29] Linguistic multi-criteria decision-making method based on emotion perception
    Zhou, Jian
    Xiao, Fu
    Du, Ning
    Yan, Xiao-Yong
    Sun, Li-Juan
    [J]. Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision, 2020, 35 (08): : 1945 - 1952
  • [30] Group Decision-Making Using Improved Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods for Credit Risk Analysis
    Wu, Wenshuai
    Kou, Gang
    Peng, Yi
    [J]. FILOMAT, 2016, 30 (15) : 4135 - 4150