Deadness and how to disprove liveness in hybrid dynamical systems

被引:7
|
作者
Navarro-Lopez, Eva M. [1 ]
Carter, Rebekah [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Comp Sci, Oxford Rd,Kilburn Bldg, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Hybrid systems; Liveness; Stability analysis; Discontinuous systems; Hybrid automata; SWITCHING CONTROLLERS; PARAMETER SYNTHESIS; LYAPUNOV FUNCTIONS; STABILITY; VERIFICATION; SAFETY; REACHABILITY; AUTOMATA;
D O I
10.1016/j.tcs.2016.06.009
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
What if we designed a tool to automatically prove the dynamical properties of systems for which analytic proof is difficult or impossible to obtain? Such a tool would represent a significant advance in the understanding of complex dynamical systems with nonlinearities. This is precisely what this paper offers: a solution to the problem of automatically proving some dynamic stability properties of complex systems with multiple discontinuities and modes of operation modelled as hybrid dynamical systems. For this purpose, we propose a reinterpretation of some stability properties from a computational viewpoint, chiefly by using the computer science concepts of safety and liveness. However, these concepts need to be redefined within the framework of hybrid dynamical systems. In computer science terms, here, we consider the problem of automatically disproving the liveness properties of nonlinear hybrid dynamical systems. For this purpose, we define a new property, which we call deadness. This is a dynamically-aware property of a hybrid system which, if true, disproves the liveness property by means of a finite execution. We formally define this property, and give an algorithm which can derive deadness properties automatically for a type of liveness property called inevitability. We show how this algorithm works for three different examples that represent three classes of hybrid systems with complex behaviours. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 23
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Formal specifications for hybrid dynamical systems
    Mosterman, PJ
    Biswas, G
    IJCAI-97 - PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTEENTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1997, : 568 - 573
  • [22] Reduction Theorems for Hybrid Dynamical Systems
    Maggiore, Manfredi
    Sassano, Mario
    Zaccarian, Luca
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2019, 64 (06) : 2254 - 2265
  • [23] Refinements of Hybrid Dynamical Systems Logic
    Platzer, Andre
    RIGOROUS STATE-BASED METHODS, ABZ 2023, 2023, 14010 : 3 - 14
  • [24] Hybrid modeling and prediction of dynamical systems
    Hamilton, Franz
    Lloyd, Alun L.
    Flores, Kevin B.
    PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2017, 13 (07)
  • [25] Generalized solutions to hybrid dynamical systems
    Sanfelice, Ricardo G.
    Goebel, Rafal
    Teel, Andrew R.
    ESAIM-CONTROL OPTIMISATION AND CALCULUS OF VARIATIONS, 2008, 14 (04) : 699 - 724
  • [26] Incremental Stability of Hybrid Dynamical Systems
    Biemond, J. J. Benjamin
    Postoyan, Romain
    Heemels, W. P. Maurice H.
    van de Wouw, Nathan
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2018, 63 (12) : 4094 - 4109
  • [27] Identification of a Class of Hybrid Dynamical Systems
    Massaroli, Stefano
    Califano, Federico
    Faragasso, Angela
    Risiglione, Mattia
    Yamashita, Atsushi
    Asama, Hajime
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2020, 53 (02): : 875 - 882
  • [28] Reference Governor for Hybrid Dynamical Systems
    Sanfelice, Ricardo G.
    Di Cairano, Stefano
    2022 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, ACC, 2022, : 4921 - 4926
  • [29] Hybrid dynamical systems: Stability and chaos
    Savkin, AV
    Matveev, AS
    PERSPECTIVES IN ROBUST CONTROL, 2001, 268 : 297 - 309
  • [30] Hybrid metric dynamical systems with impulses
    Nieto, JJ
    Rodríguez-López, R
    NONLINEAR ANALYSIS-THEORY METHODS & APPLICATIONS, 2006, 64 (02) : 368 - 380