Development of Aquaculture Protocols and Gonadal Differentiation of Red Shiner

被引:2
|
作者
Teal, Chad N. [1 ]
Schill, Daniel J. [2 ]
Fogelson, Susan B. [3 ]
Bonar, Scott A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Sch Nat Resources & Environm, Arizona Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res Unit, ENR2 Room N315,1064 East Lowell St, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Fisheries Management Solut Inc, 9950 West Prairie Rd, Boise, ID 83714 USA
[3] Fishhead Labs LLC, 5658 Southeast Pine Ave, Stuart, FL 34997 USA
[4] Univ Arizona, Sch Nat Resources & Environm, Arizona Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res Unit, US Geol Survey, ENR2 Room N315,1064 East Lowell St, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
关键词
TROJAN SEX-CHROMOSOMES; CYPRINELLA-LUTRENSIS; NOTROPIS-LUTRENSIS; SPAWNING BEHAVIOR; FISH LARVAE; POPULATION; FECUNDITY; MODEL; DIETS; FEMINIZATION;
D O I
10.1002/naaq.10176
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Developing detailed rearing methods and describing the onset of gonadal differentiation in Red Shiners Cyprinella lutrensis could facilitate the development of novel techniques to control or enhance populations, enable toxicology studies, and help construct bioassays. In this study, we develop and report aquaculture practices for Red Shiner that ensure consistent year-round production in laboratory settings and evaluate the timing of sexual differentiation via histological gonad examinations. Our methods resulted in a mean of 56.00% (SD = 8.98%) survival through the larval stages of development, and we obtained spawns from captive-reared Red Shiners 138 d posthatch. Red Shiners are gonochoristic, and both ovaries and testes differentiate directly from undifferentiated gonads. Ovaries begin to differentiate in females 45 d posthatch, while testes begin differentiating in males 105 d posthatch. This study provides in-depth protocols for the closed-cycle aquaculture of Red Shiners and describes the gonadal differentiation and development of both sexes.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 154
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Development and gonadal sex differentiation in the neotenic urodele: Ambystoma mexicanum
    Mendoza-Cruz, Eva
    Moreno-Mendoza, Norma
    Zambrano, Luis
    Villagran-SantaCruz, Maricela
    ZOOMORPHOLOGY, 2017, 136 (04) : 497 - 509
  • [22] LARVAL DEVELOPMENT OF GOLDEN SHINER AND COMELY SHINER FROM NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA
    BUYNAK, GL
    MOHR, HW
    PROGRESSIVE FISH-CULTURIST, 1980, 42 (04): : 206 - 211
  • [23] MECHANISM OF GONADAL DIFFERENTIATION
    WOLF, U
    BULLETIN DER SCHWEIZERISCHEN AKADEMIE DER MEDIZINISCHEN WISSENSCHAFTEN, 1978, 34 (4-6): : 357 - 368
  • [24] PHOTOPERIOD AND TEMPERATURE EFFECTS ON GONADAL REGRESSION IN GOLDEN SHINER, NOTEMIGONUS-CRYSOLEUCAS
    VLAMING, VLD
    PAQUETTE, G
    COPEIA, 1977, (04) : 793 - 797
  • [25] Abnormalities of gonadal differentiation
    Berkovitz, GD
    Seeherunvong, T
    BAILLIERES CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM, 1998, 12 (01): : 133 - 142
  • [26] MECHANISMS OF GONADAL DIFFERENTIATION
    HASELTINE, FP
    OHNO, S
    SCIENCE, 1981, 211 (4488) : 1272 - 1278
  • [27] Geographic independence and phylogenetic diversity of red shiner introductions
    Gregory J. Glotzbecker
    Fernando Alda
    Richard E. Broughton
    David A. Neely
    Richard L. Mayden
    Michael J. Blum
    Conservation Genetics, 2016, 17 : 795 - 809
  • [28] Expression of Epithelial and Mesenchymal Differentiation Markers in the Early Human Gonadal Development
    Martinovic, Vlatka
    Pusic, Tanja Vukusic
    Restovic, Ivana
    Bocina, Ivana
    Filipovic, Natalija
    Saraga-Babic, Mirna
    Vukojevic, Katarina
    ANATOMICAL RECORD-ADVANCES IN INTEGRATIVE ANATOMY AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2017, 300 (07): : 1315 - 1326
  • [29] Gonadal differentiation and its sensitivity to androgens during development of Pelophylax nigromaculatus
    Li, Yuan-Yuan
    Meng, Tan
    Gao, Kun
    Qin, Zhan-Fen
    AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY, 2018, 202 : 188 - 195
  • [30] Geographic independence and phylogenetic diversity of red shiner introductions
    Glotzbecker, Gregory J.
    Alda, Fernando
    Broughton, Richard E.
    Neely, David A.
    Mayden, Richard L.
    Blum, Michael J.
    CONSERVATION GENETICS, 2016, 17 (04) : 795 - 809