Subjective Assessment of the Influence of Room Characteristics on Intelligibility of Noised Speech

被引:0
|
作者
Prodeus, Arkadiy [1 ]
Kotvytskyi, Igor [1 ]
Garasiuk, Anastasia [1 ]
Semenchuk, Anastasia [1 ]
Lozinskyi, Vladyslav [1 ]
Telenga, Anna [1 ]
Andriichenko, Oleksiy [1 ]
Klymenko, Sergii [1 ]
Denysenko, Oleksandr [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Tech Univ Ukraine, Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytech Inst, Dept Acoust & Acoustoelect, Kiev, Ukraine
关键词
speech intelligibility; subjective assessment; binaural impulse response; white noise; late reverberation; early reflections; articulation test; EARLY REFLECTIONS; ACOUSTICS;
D O I
10.1109/elnano.2019.8783250
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
A room is a special kind of filter that affects speech intelligibility in two ways. Late reverberation, like noise, reduces speech intelligibility, while early reflections increase speech intelligibility. The influence of the listening mode on the intelligibility of noised speech is also known. Binaural listening is preferable to monaural one because it allows increase intelligibility of speech distorted by noise and reverberation. In this paper, a subjective assessment of the influence of the lecture room characteristics on intelligibility of noised speech during binaural listening was made. The test stimuli were formed in two stages. First, white noise was added to the speech signal which had the form of consonant-vowel-consonant type monosyllable to provide the required signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in the range from minus 15 dB to plus 5 dB. Then the noisy speech was subjected to two-channel filtration using the binaural room impulse response (RIR) as the impulse response of the nonrecursive filter. Binaural RIRs measured for six different distances from the sound source (from 2.25 m to 10.2 m) in the lecture room of 10.8 x 10.9 x 3.15 m were used. Filtered phrases were listened through headphones, and monosyllables were identified and fixed by means of computer keyboard. The results of articulation tests showed that speech intelligibility is 7-10% higher for distances of 7-10 m than for a distance of 2.25 m with SNR = -10. . . -5 dB, which can be explained by the useful combined effect of early reflections and binaural listening. However, speech intelligibility for distances of 4-10 m turned out to be less than intelligibility for a distance of 2.25 m with SNR>3-5 dB, which can be explained by the prevalence of the detrimental effect of late reverberation over the action of noise at medium and large SNR values.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 453
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] RELATIONSHIP OF INTELLIGIBILITY AND SUBJECTIVE QUALITY OF DIGITALLY CODED SPEECH
    GOODMAN, DJ
    GOODMAN, JS
    CHEN, M
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1975, 58 : S130 - S130
  • [22] INTELLIGIBILITY ASSESSMENT OF IDEAL BINARY-MASKED NOISY SPEECH WITH ACCEPTANCE OF ROOM ACOUSTIC
    Sedlak, Vladimir
    Durackova, Daniela
    Zalusky, Roman
    Kovacik, Tomas
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING-ELEKTROTECHNICKY CASOPIS, 2014, 65 (06): : 325 - 332
  • [23] Automated System for Subjective Evaluation of the Ukrainian Speech Intelligibility
    Prodeus, A.
    Bukhta, K.
    Morozko, P.
    Serhiienko, O.
    Kotvytskyi, I.
    Shherbenko, I.
    2018 IEEE 38TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONICS AND NANOTECHNOLOGY (ELNANO), 2018, : 533 - 538
  • [24] Automated Subjective Evaluation of Speech Intelligibility in Noise and Reverberation
    Prodeus, Arkadiy
    Didkovskyi, Vitalii
    Didkovska, Maryna
    Kotvytskyi, Igor
    2018 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED TRENDS IN RADIOELECTRONICS, TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING (TCSET), 2018, : 555 - 558
  • [25] TANK CREW PERFORMANCE - EFFECTS OF SPEECH-INTELLIGIBILITY ON TARGET ACQUISITION AND SUBJECTIVE WORKLOAD ASSESSMENT
    WHITAKER, L
    PETERS, L
    GARINTHER, G
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE HUMAN FACTORS SOCIETY 33RD ANNUAL MEETING, VOL 2, 1989, : 1411 - 1413
  • [26] Subjective judgments of clarity and intelligibility for filtered stimuli with equivalent speech intelligibility index predictions
    Eisenberg, LS
    Dirks, DD
    Takayanagi, S
    Martinez, AS
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1998, 41 (02): : 327 - 339
  • [27] Speech intelligibility assessment in a helium environment. II. The speech intelligibility index
    Mendel, LL
    Hamill, BW
    Hendrix, JE
    Crepeau, LJ
    Pelton, JD
    Miley, MD
    Kadlec, EE
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1998, 104 (03): : 1609 - 1615
  • [28] Towards a comprehensive assessment of speech intelligibility for pathological speech
    Xue, W.
    Ramos, V. Mendoza
    Harmsen, W.
    Cucchiarini, C.
    van Hout, R. W. N. M.
    Strik, H.
    INTERSPEECH 2020, 2020, : 3146 - 3150
  • [29] Assessment of Speech Intelligibility in Auditoriums.
    Jelencic, I.
    Elektrotehnika Zagreb, 1985, 28 (03): : 115 - 125
  • [30] Speech intelligibility model including room and loudspeaker influences
    Faiget, L
    Ruiz, R
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1999, 105 (06): : 3345 - 3354