A robust decision-making methodology for evaluation and selection of simulation software package

被引:33
|
作者
Azadeh, A. [1 ]
Nazari Shirkouhi, S. [1 ]
Rezaie, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Dept Ind Engn, Ctr Excellence Intelligent Based Expt Mech, Dept Engn Optimizat Res,Coll Engn, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Simulation software; Software selection; Multi-criteria decision making; Fuzzy AHP; FUZZY ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY; MODEL; AHP;
D O I
10.1007/s00170-009-2205-6
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Today, simulation has a broad range of applications from solving service problems to analyzing manufacturing problems such as warehousing and logistic systems. Simulation has become a popular methodology and selecting an appropriate simulation software package is one of the decisions that any industrial engineer may face at work. As a result, numerous types of simulation software packages have been developed for modeling simulation problems. The increasing variety of simulation software packages in the software market makes the selection of an appropriate simulation software package a critical decision. Selecting an inappropriate software package will be followed by many negative consequences. This paper will present a robust decision-making methodology based on Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) for evaluating and selecting the appropriate simulation software package. The robust decision method aggregates the experts' judgments for the criteria weights and the suitability of simulation software alternatives. The FAHP is used to prioritize and evaluate existing alternatives based on the proposed criteria for choosing the proper simulation software. The proposed methodology is applied to selecting the appropriate simulation software as an experiment and results are provided.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 393
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A decision-making methodology integrated in product design for additive manufacturing process selection
    Liu, Wei
    Zhu, Zicheng
    Ye, Songhe
    [J]. RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (05) : 895 - 909
  • [32] A SIMULATION GAME FOR DECISION-MAKING
    CAVIN, ED
    CAVIN, CS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 1981, 58 (05) : 410 - 411
  • [33] SIMULATION FOR DECISION-MAKING - AN INTRODUCTION
    THESEN, A
    TRAVIS, LE
    [J]. 1989 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 1989, : 9 - 18
  • [34] USE OF SIMULATION FOR DECISION-MAKING
    SCHULTZ, RL
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1974, 19 (05): : 344 - 350
  • [35] SIMULATION FOR DECISION-MAKING IN MARKETING
    WEISS, DL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1964, 28 (03): : 45 - 50
  • [36] Obstetric Decision-Making and Simulation
    Sceales, Panagiota
    Odor, Peter
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2020, 130 (02): : E39 - E39
  • [37] Accessing decision-making in software design
    Christiaans, Henri
    Almendra, Rita Assoreira
    [J]. DESIGN STUDIES, 2010, 31 (06) : 641 - 662
  • [38] CHOOSING PC SOFTWARE FOR DECISION-MAKING
    WU, MS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, 1988, 39 (12): : 19 - 26
  • [39] THE SOFTWARE THAT CHANGED DECISION-MAKING AT XEROX
    KADOR, J
    [J]. BUSINESS SOFTWARE REVIEW, 1987, 6 (01): : 20 - &
  • [40] A Methodology for Decision-Making in the Performance Evaluation of Multistage Multiproduct Production Lines
    Ferreira, L. P.
    Ares, E.
    Pelaez, G.
    Dieguez, J.
    [J]. 4TH MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE (MESIC 2011), 2012, 1431 : 791 - 798