Does supplemental private health insurance incentivize household risky financial asset investment? Evidence from the China Household Financial Survey

被引:0
|
作者
Shi, Si [1 ]
Jiang, Yawen [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Publ Hlth Shenzhen, 66 Gongchang Rd, Shenzhen, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Private health insurance; Stock; Risky financial investment; Background risk; China; STOCK INVESTMENT; PORTFOLIO CHOICE; CARE-SYSTEM; DETERMINANTS; EXPENDITURES; RETIREMENT; INCLUSION; LITERACY; AVERSION; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1007/s10754-022-09326-9
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Private health insurance (PHI) is considered a supplement to public medical insurance schemes in China. To the extent that PHI coverage may offset background risk by decreasing medical expenditure risk, it may also incentivize risky financial behaviors. However, empirical evidence confirming this theory is absent in China. We fill this void by examining the impact of supplemental PHI on household risky financial investment using data from the China Household Financial Survey (CHFS). In the first set of analyses, we used bivariate probit (BVP) models with instrumental variables (IVs) to examine the effects of PHI on the extensive margin of household risky financial investment. In the second set of analyses, we used Tobit models with a two-stage residual inclusion (2SRI) framework to examine the effects of PHI on the corresponding intensive margin. The results indicated that supplemental PHI increased the probability of holding risky financial assets. On top of that, PHI increased the percentage of total financial assets allocated to risky financial investment. Such effects were more pronounced on stocks than on other risky products. Our findings provided evidence that purchasing supplemental PHI in China may increase the risk tolerance of financial investment, and risk attitude is a mediating factor between PHI ownership and risky financial investment behavior.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:369 / 421
页数:53
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Private medical insurance and saving: evidence from the British Household Panel Survey
    Guariglia, A
    Rossi, M
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2004, 23 (04) : 761 - 783
  • [42] Research on the impact of population aging and endowment insurance on household financial asset allocation- Evidence on CFPS data
    Liu, Sujiao
    Zhu, Mengcheng
    Ling, Wenhao
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 54
  • [43] The Impact of Medical Insurance on Household Stock Market Participation: Evidence From China Household Finance Survey
    Shi, Gui Fen
    Li, Mei
    Shen, Tao-Tao
    Ma, Yue
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 9
  • [44] How Does Fertility Policy Relaxation Affect Household Financial Asset Allocation? Evidence from the Universal Two-Child Policy in China
    Wang, Yujie
    Ge, Run
    Gao, Wenjing
    Tang, Dunzhe
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [45] Does environmental pollution influence household asset allocation? Evidence from China
    Min Zhang
    Yulin Liu
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 : 15406 - 15423
  • [46] Does environmental pollution influence household asset allocation? Evidence from China
    Zhang, Min
    Liu, Yulin
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (12) : 15406 - 15423
  • [47] EMPLOYMENT TYPE, RESIDENTIAL STATUS AND CONSUMER FINANCIAL CAPABILITY: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA HOUSEHOLD FINANCE SURVEY
    Cui, Xu
    Xiao, Jing Jian
    Yi, Jingtao
    SINGAPORE ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2019, 64 (01): : 57 - 81
  • [48] DOES FINANCIAL INCLUSION ALLEVIATE HOUSEHOLD POVERTY? EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM INDONESIA
    Dawood, Taufiq Carnegie
    Pratama, Hasta
    Masbar, Raja
    Effendi, Rustam
    ECONOMICS & SOCIOLOGY, 2019, 12 (02) : 235 - 252
  • [49] Does household financial access facilitate law compliance? Evidence from Mexico
    Gutierrez, Emilio
    Teshima, Kensuke
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2016, 149 : 120 - 124
  • [50] Household Financial Investment Risk in China in the New Era and Its Prevention
    Yan, Wang
    PROCEEDINGS OF CHINA-CANADA WORKSHOP ON FINANCIAL ENGINEERING AND ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT 2013, 2013, : 216 - 220