Are virtual physiology laboratories effective for student learning? A systematic review

被引:17
|
作者
Zhang, Xinyu [1 ]
Al-Mekhled, Dawoud [1 ]
Choate, Julia [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Physiol, Clayton, Vic, Australia
关键词
physiology; simulation; undergraduate; virtual laboratory; EDUCATION; PERFORMANCE; SCIENCE; TOOL;
D O I
10.1152/advan.00016.2021
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
It is unclear if the transition from traditional, in-person physiology laboratories to virtual alternatives has educational impacts on students. This study used a systematic review to critically evaluate research papers that investigated the effectiveness of virtual physiology laboratories for student learning. Eleven studies, retrieved from the Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) and Ovid MEDLINE databases, were selected for inclusion in this review, based on predetermined eligibility criteria. Subsequently, the studies went through a power analysis for potential biases before their results were synthesized and analyzed. This systematic review found that virtual physiology laboratories are effective for students' learning of concepts. However, it was inconclusive as to whether virtual physiology laboratories are effective for students' motivation for learning and learning of technical skills. It was found that blended models of virtual laboratories are at least as effective as in-person laboratories for conceptual learning. Overall, this systematic review provides useful insights for educators regarding the educational impacts of implementing virtual laboratories into the physiology curriculum and suggests research models for future evaluation of virtual laboratories.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 480
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Virtual Laboratories in Undergraduate Science and Engineering Courses: a Systematic Review, 2009–2019
    Shalaunda M. Reeves
    Kent J. Crippen
    Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2021, 30 : 16 - 30
  • [32] Virtual chemical laboratories: A systematic literature review of research, technologies and instructional design
    Chan, Philippe
    Van Gerven, Tom
    Dubois, Jean-Luc
    Bernaerts, Kristel
    COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION OPEN, 2021, 2
  • [33] Hypothesis grounded laboratories for group learning in physiology
    Malloy, LG
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2000, 14 (04): : A311 - A311
  • [34] Virtual and Augmented Reality Enhancements to Medical and Science Student Physiology and Anatomy Test Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Moro, Christian
    Birt, James
    Stromberga, Zane
    Phelps, Charlotte
    Clark, Justin
    Glasziou, Paul
    Scott, Anna Mae
    ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2021, 14 (03) : 368 - 376
  • [35] Exploring Differences in Student Learning and Inquiry Skills Between Hands-On and Virtual Chemistry Laboratories
    Chen, Shuangshuang
    Xue, Song
    Yang, Dan
    Zhu, Liying
    Ye, Mingzhan
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 101 (10) : 4102 - 4113
  • [36] Virtual laboratories as a tool to support learning
    Herraez, Angel
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY-TURK BIYOKIMYA DERGISI, 2022, 47 (02): : 195 - 200
  • [37] Characterization of Student Model Development in Physical and Virtual Laboratories
    Nefcy, Erick J.
    Harding, Philip H.
    Koretsky, Milo
    2011 ASEE ANNUAL CONFERENCE & EXPOSITION, 2011,
  • [38] The positive impact of team-based virtual microscopy on student learning in physiology and histology
    Goldberg, Harry R.
    Dintzis, Renee
    ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2007, 31 (03) : 261 - 265
  • [39] Learning in student-run clinics: a systematic review
    Schutte, Tim
    Tichelaar, Jelle
    Dekker, Ramon S.
    van Agtmael, Michiel A.
    de Vries, Theo P. G. M.
    Richir, Milan C.
    MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2015, 49 (03) : 249 - 263
  • [40] A systematic review of student learning outcomes in CLIL in LOTE
    Pittas, Evdokia
    Tompkins, Leah
    FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2024, 9