Errors in the Estimation Method for the Rejection of Vibrations in Adaptive Optics Systems

被引:0
|
作者
Kania, Dariusz [1 ]
机构
[1] Wroclaw Univ Sci & Technol, Chair Elect & Photon Metrol, B Prusa 53-55, PL-50317 Wroclaw, Poland
来源
关键词
adaptive optics; mechanical vibrations; parameter estimation; FFT; systematic errors; FREQUENCY ESTIMATION; PRONYS METHOD; LIDFT METHOD;
D O I
10.1117/12.2275597
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
In recent years the problem of the mechanical vibrations impact in adaptive optics (AO) systems has been renewed. These signals are damped sinusoidal signals and have deleterious effect on the system. One of software solutions to reject the vibrations is an adaptive method called AVC (Adaptive Vibration Cancellation) where the procedure has three steps: estimation of perturbation parameters, estimation of the frequency response of the plant, update the reference signal to reject/minimalize the vibration. In the first step a very important problem is the estimation method. A very accurate and fast (below 10 ms) estimation method of these three parameters has been presented in several publications in recent years. The method is based on using the spectrum interpolation and MSD time windows and it can be used to estimate multifrequency signals In this paper the estimation method is used in the AVC method to increase the system performance. There are several parameters that affect the accuracy of obtained results, e.g. CiR number of signal periods in a measurement window, N number of samples in the FFT procedure, H time window order, SNR, b number of ADC bits, y damping ratio of the tested signal. Systematic errors increase when N, CiR, H decrease and when y increases. The value for systematic error is approximately 10(-10) Hz/Hz for N = 2048 and CiR = 0.1. This paper presents equations that can used to estimate maximum systematic errors for given values of H, CiR and N before the start of the estimation process.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] BANDWIDTH SPECIFICATION FOR ADAPTIVE OPTICS SYSTEMS
    GREENWOOD, DP
    JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1977, 67 (03) : 390 - 393
  • [32] An Identification Method for Stochastic Continuous-time Disturbances in Adaptive Optics Systems
    Coronel, Maria
    Orellana, Rafael
    Carvajal, Rodrigo
    Escarate, Pedro
    Aguero, Juan C.
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2023, 56 (02): : 4228 - 4233
  • [33] Gain optimization for adaptive optics systems
    Looze, DP
    Merritt, N
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2003 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-6, 2003, : 3370 - 3374
  • [34] Effect of scintillation on adaptive optics systems
    Voitsekhovich, VV
    Sánchez, LJ
    Orlov, VG
    REVISTA MEXICANA DE ASTRONOMIA Y ASTROFISICA, 2002, 38 (02) : 193 - 198
  • [35] Estimation and rejection of unknown sinusoidal disturbances using a generalized adaptive forced balancing method
    Vahedforough, Elnaz
    Shafai, Bahram
    Beale, Stuart
    2007 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-13, 2007, : 4184 - 4189
  • [36] Design of the adaptive optics systems for GMT
    Lloyd-Hart, Michael
    Angel, Roger
    Milton, N. Mark
    Rademacher, Matt
    Codona, Johanan
    ADVANCES IN ADAPTIVE OPTICS II, PRS 1-3, 2006, 6272 : U133 - U144
  • [37] Adaptive optics systems evolution in astronomy
    Tyson, RK
    OPTICAL TELESCOPES OF TODAY AND TOMORROW: FOLLOWING IN THE DIRECTION OF TYCHO BRAHE, 1997, 2871 : 795 - 799
  • [38] Mitigation of vibrations in adaptive optics by minimization of closed-loop residuals
    Guesalaga, Andres
    Neichel, Benoit
    O'Neal, Jared
    Guzman, Dani
    OPTICS EXPRESS, 2013, 21 (09): : 10676 - 10696
  • [39] Preliminary Evaluation and Comparison of Atmospheric Turbulence Rejection Performance for Infinite and Receding Horizon Control in Adaptive Optics Systems
    Konnik, Mikhail V.
    De Dona, Jose
    ADAPTIVE OPTICS SYSTEMS IV, 2014, 9148
  • [40] Adaptive estimation of cointegrating regressions with ARMA errors
    Hodgson, DJ
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1998, 85 (02) : 231 - 267