Development and validation of a training and assessment tool for laparoscopic radical nephrectomy

被引:4
|
作者
Lovegrove, C. [1 ]
Bruce, E. [1 ]
Raison, N. [1 ]
Khan, S. [2 ]
Brown, C. [1 ]
Rane, A. [2 ]
Sheriff, M. [3 ]
Dasgupta, P. [1 ]
Ahmed, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Urol, Kings Hlth Partners,MRC,Ctr Transplantat, London, England
[2] East Surrey Hosp, Dept Urol, Redhill, Surrey, England
[3] Medway Maritime Hosp, Dept Urol, Gillingham, England
来源
ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS | 2018年 / 42卷 / 06期
关键词
Training; Assessment; Laparoscopy; Urology; Nephrectomy; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.acuro.2017.10.007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy(LRN) is a cornerstone in managing renal cancer and small renal masses. Twenty-first century surgical training faces challenges, thus must be efficient and safe so surgeons attain relevant skills, protecting patients and operative outcomes. This study aimed to systematically develop a tool for training and assessment in LRN and validate the developed tool for use by trainee urologists. Methods: This prospective, longitudinal, multi-institutional study was undertaken from September 2014 - June 2015. Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis was utilised for development and followed by validation where the assessment tool was distributed to five specialists to increase content validity. Four experts were observed as a multi-institutional approach. Hand-assisted, transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches were considered. Results: The LRN Assessment Tool comprised four phases, 17 processes, 41 sub-processes. Four surgeons and operating teams were observed across four hospitals for 19.5 hours (5.75 h hand- assisted, 8.75 h trans-peritoneal, 5h retro-peritoneal). After hazard analysis, three checklists were constructed. Those for hand-assisted LRN and transperitoneal LRN contained four phases, 20 processes, 33 sub-processes and that for retroperitoneal LRN contained four phases, 20 processes, 30 sub-processes. These were merged to form one assessment tool. The final result was a four phase LRN Assessment Tool with 17 processes, 41 sub-processes. All participants agreed the final LRN Assessment Tool included pertinent steps. Conclusions: The LRN Assessment Tool was developed using Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis risk analysis to ensure hazardous procedural sub-steps were included. Validation ascertained important processes were not overlooked. Full application through a pilot study must be undertaken. (C) 2018 AEU. Published by Elsevier Espaha, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 405
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy
    Tierney, AC
    Nakada, SY
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 18 (04) : 249 - 256
  • [22] Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in the elderly
    Varkarakis, I
    Neururer, R
    Harabayashi, T
    Bartsch, G
    Peschel, R
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 94 (04) : 517 - 520
  • [23] Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy
    Yin, Changiun
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 : A116 - A116
  • [24] Limits of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy
    Alvarez-Maestro, Mario
    Rios, Emilio
    Martinez-Pineiro, Luis
    Diez, Jesus
    Javier Sanchez, Francisco
    Linares, Ana
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2013, 66 (01): : 168 - 179
  • [25] Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for cancer
    Gill, IS
    UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2000, 27 (04) : 707 - +
  • [26] The development and validation of the first virtual reality laparoscopic nephrectomy simulator
    Brewin, J. W.
    Nedas, T.
    Challacombe, B.
    Keisu, J.
    Lindbloom, M.
    Dasgupta, P.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 103 : 24 - 24
  • [27] Editorial Comment to Validation of a kidney model made of N-composite gel as a training tool for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
    Takagi, Toshio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 27 (06) : 568 - 568
  • [28] Hand assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: Comparison with open radical nephrectomy
    Lee, SE
    Ku, JH
    Kwak, C
    Kim, HH
    Paick, SH
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (03): : 756 - 759
  • [29] Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy versus open radical nephrectomy: A outcome analysis
    Vyas, Jigish
    Ganpule, Arvind
    Sharma, Rajan
    Muthu, V.
    Manohar, T.
    Desai, Mahesh R.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 : A188 - A188
  • [30] Validation and motion analyses of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with Thiel-embalmed cadavers
    Yan, Lingbo
    Ebina, Koki
    Abe, Takashige
    Kon, Masafumi
    Higuchi, Madoka
    Hotta, Kiyohiko
    Furumido, Jun
    Iwahara, Naoya
    Komizunai, Shunsuke
    Tsujita, Teppei
    Sase, Kazuya
    Chen, Xiaoshuai
    Kurashima, Yo
    Kikuchi, Hiroshi
    Miyata, Haruka
    Matsumoto, Ryuji
    Osawa, Takahiro
    Murai, Sachiyo
    Shichinohe, Toshiaki
    Murakami, Soichi
    Senoo, Taku
    Watanabe, Masahiko
    Konno, Atsushi
    Shinohara, Nobuo
    CURRENT PROBLEMS IN SURGERY, 2024, 61 (10)