Development and validation of a training and assessment tool for laparoscopic radical nephrectomy

被引:4
|
作者
Lovegrove, C. [1 ]
Bruce, E. [1 ]
Raison, N. [1 ]
Khan, S. [2 ]
Brown, C. [1 ]
Rane, A. [2 ]
Sheriff, M. [3 ]
Dasgupta, P. [1 ]
Ahmed, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Urol, Kings Hlth Partners,MRC,Ctr Transplantat, London, England
[2] East Surrey Hosp, Dept Urol, Redhill, Surrey, England
[3] Medway Maritime Hosp, Dept Urol, Gillingham, England
来源
ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS | 2018年 / 42卷 / 06期
关键词
Training; Assessment; Laparoscopy; Urology; Nephrectomy; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.acuro.2017.10.007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy(LRN) is a cornerstone in managing renal cancer and small renal masses. Twenty-first century surgical training faces challenges, thus must be efficient and safe so surgeons attain relevant skills, protecting patients and operative outcomes. This study aimed to systematically develop a tool for training and assessment in LRN and validate the developed tool for use by trainee urologists. Methods: This prospective, longitudinal, multi-institutional study was undertaken from September 2014 - June 2015. Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis was utilised for development and followed by validation where the assessment tool was distributed to five specialists to increase content validity. Four experts were observed as a multi-institutional approach. Hand-assisted, transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches were considered. Results: The LRN Assessment Tool comprised four phases, 17 processes, 41 sub-processes. Four surgeons and operating teams were observed across four hospitals for 19.5 hours (5.75 h hand- assisted, 8.75 h trans-peritoneal, 5h retro-peritoneal). After hazard analysis, three checklists were constructed. Those for hand-assisted LRN and transperitoneal LRN contained four phases, 20 processes, 33 sub-processes and that for retroperitoneal LRN contained four phases, 20 processes, 30 sub-processes. These were merged to form one assessment tool. The final result was a four phase LRN Assessment Tool with 17 processes, 41 sub-processes. All participants agreed the final LRN Assessment Tool included pertinent steps. Conclusions: The LRN Assessment Tool was developed using Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis risk analysis to ensure hazardous procedural sub-steps were included. Validation ascertained important processes were not overlooked. Full application through a pilot study must be undertaken. (C) 2018 AEU. Published by Elsevier Espaha, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 405
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Initial validation of a training program focused on laparoscopic radical nephrectomy
    Enciso, S.
    Diaz-Gueemes, I.
    Serrano, A.
    Bachiller, J.
    Rioja, J.
    Uson, J.
    Sanchez-Margallo, F. M.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2016, 40 (04): : 237 - 244
  • [2] DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A NOVEL COGNITIVE TRAINING TOOL FOR LAPAROSCOPIC SUTURING
    Raison, Nicholas
    Wallace, Lauren
    Abe, Takashige
    Hafiz, Fehmi
    Sheriff, Matin
    Brown, Christian
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Ahmed, Kamran
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E701 - E701
  • [3] DEVELOPMENT AND CONTENT VALIDATION OF A TRAINING AND ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR RAPN
    Lovegrove, Catherine
    Bruce, Eilidh
    Raison, Nicholas
    Challacombe, Benjamin
    Novara, Giacomo
    Mottrie, Alex
    Hubert, Jaques
    Murphy, Declan
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Ahmed, Kamran
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E700 - E700
  • [4] Description and Validation of a Modular Training System for Laparoscopic Nephrectomy
    Stewart, Grant D.
    Phipps, Simon
    Little, Brian
    Leveckis, John
    Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
    Tolley, David A.
    McNeill, S. Alan
    Riddick, Antony C. P.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 (11) : 1512 - 1517
  • [5] Laparoscopic radical versus partial nephrectomy: Assessment of complications
    Kim, FJ
    Rha, KH
    Hernandez, F
    Jarrett, TW
    Pinto, PA
    Kavoussi, LR
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (02): : 408 - 411
  • [6] Preliminary Validation of Thiel Embalmed Cadavers for Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy
    Rai, Bhavan P.
    Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
    Healy, Samuel
    Tang, Benjie
    Jones, Patrick
    Sweeney, Clare
    Somani, Bhaskar K.
    Biyani, Chandra Shekhar
    Nabi, Ghulam
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2015, 29 (05) : 595 - 603
  • [7] DEVELOPMENT AND CONTENT VALIDATION OF THE ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR ROBOT-ASSISTED PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY
    Bruce, Eilidh
    Lovegrove, Catherine
    Raison, Nicholas
    Challacombe, Benjamin
    Novara, Giacomo
    Mottrie, Alex
    Hubert, Jacques
    Murphy, Declan
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Ahmed, Kamran
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E217 - E218
  • [8] Validation of a kidney model made of N-composite gel as a training tool for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
    Ohtake, Shinji
    Makiyama, Kazuhide
    Yamashita, Daisuke
    Tatenuma, Tomoyuki
    Yamanaka, Hiroyuki
    Yao, Masahiro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 27 (06) : 567 - 568
  • [9] Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy
    Dunn, MD
    McDougall, EM
    Clayman, RV
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2000, 14 (10) : 849 - 855
  • [10] Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy
    Janetschek, G
    Al-Zachrani, H
    Vrabec, G
    Leeb, K
    UROLOGE A, 2002, 41 (02): : 101 - 106