DPXPlain: Privately Explaining Aggregate Query Answers

被引:3
|
作者
Tao, Yuchao [1 ]
Gilad, Amir [1 ]
Machanavajjhala, Ashwin [1 ]
Roy, Sudeepa [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Durham, NC 27708 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE VLDB ENDOWMENT | 2022年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词
DIFFERENTIAL PRIVACY; PROVENANCE; SECURE;
D O I
10.14778/3561261.3561271
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Differential privacy (DP) is the state-of-the-art and rigorous notion of privacy for answering aggregate database queries while preserving the privacy of sensitive information in the data. In today's era of data analysis, however, it poses new challenges for users to understand the trends and anomalies observed in the query results: Is the unexpected answer due to the data itself, or is it due to the extra noise that must be added to preserve DP? In the second case, even the observation made by the users on query results may be wrong. In the first case, can we still mine interesting explanations from the sensitive data while protecting its privacy? To address these challenges, we present a three-phase framework DPXPLAIN, which is the first system to the best of our knowledge for explaining group-by aggregate query answers with DP. In its three phases, DPXPLAIN (a) answers a group-by aggregate query with DP, (b) allows users to compare aggregate values of two groups and with high probability assesses whether this comparison holds or is flipped by the DP noise, and (c) eventually provides an explanation table containing the approximately 'top-k' explanation predicates along with their relative influences and ranks in the form of confidence intervals, while guaranteeing DP in all steps. We perform an extensive experimental analysis of DPXPLAIN with multiple use-cases on real and synthetic data showing that DPXPLAIN efficiently provides insightful explanations with good accuracy and utility.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 126
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] RELATIONAL SPECIFICATIONS OF INFINITE QUERY ANSWERS
    CHOMICKI, J
    IMIELINSKI, T
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1989 ACM SIGMOD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE MANAGEMENT OF DATA, 1989, 18 : 174 - 183
  • [32] Representative Query Answers on Uncertain Data
    Schmid, Klaus Arthur
    Zufle, Andreas
    SSTD '19 - PROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DATABASES, 2019, : 140 - 149
  • [33] Federated mediators for query composite answers
    Cheng, Dong
    Boudjlida, Nacer
    ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS VI, 2006, : 261 - +
  • [34] Explaining Missing Answers to SPJUA Queries
    Herschel, Melanie
    Hernandez, Mauricio A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE VLDB ENDOWMENT, 2010, 3 (01): : 185 - 196
  • [35] Explaining Unexpected Answers of SPARQL Queries
    Parkin, Louise
    Chardin, Brice
    Jean, Stephane
    Hadjali, Allel
    WEB INFORMATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING - WISE 2022, 2022, 13724 : 136 - 151
  • [36] Consistent Answers to Boolean Aggregate Queries under Aggregate Constraints
    Flesca, Sergio
    Furfaro, Filippo
    Parisi, Francesco
    DATABASE AND EXPERT SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS, PT 2, 2010, 6262 : 285 - 299
  • [37] Explaining Natural Language query results
    Deutch, Daniel
    Frost, Nave
    Gilad, Amir
    VLDB JOURNAL, 2020, 29 (01): : 485 - 508
  • [38] EXPLAINING AMBIGUITY IN A FORMAL QUERY LANGUAGE
    WALD, JA
    SORENSON, PG
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON DATABASE SYSTEMS, 1990, 15 (02): : 125 - 161
  • [39] Explaining Natural Language query results
    Daniel Deutch
    Nave Frost
    Amir Gilad
    The VLDB Journal, 2020, 29 : 485 - 508
  • [40] A Fuzzy Approach to the Characterization of Database Query Answers
    Moreau, Aurelien
    Pivert, Olivier
    Smits, Gregory
    INFORMATION PROCESSING AND MANAGEMENT OF UNCERTAINTY IN KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, IPMU 2016, PT II, 2016, 611 : 329 - 340