Ventricular arrhythmia burden during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic

被引:47
|
作者
O'Shea, Catherine J. [1 ,2 ]
Thomas, Gijo [1 ]
Middeldorp, Melissa E. [1 ,2 ]
Harper, Curtis [3 ]
Elliott, Adrian D. [1 ]
Ray, Noemi [3 ]
Lau, Dennis H. [1 ,2 ]
Campbell, Kevin [1 ,3 ]
Sanders, Prashanthan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Ctr Heart Rhythm Disorders, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Royal Adelaide Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] PaceMate, Bradenton, FL USA
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
COVID-19; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Ventricular arrhythmia; Ventricular tachycardia; Ventricular fibrillation; Remote monitoring; CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; EARTHQUAKE; SWITZERLAND; INCREASE; STRESS; ATTACK; DEATH;
D O I
10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa893
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims Our objective was to determine the ventricular arrhythmia burden in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients during COVID-19. Methods and results In this multicentre, observational, cohort study over a 100-day period during the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA, we assessed ventricular arrhythmias in ICD patients from 20 centres in 13 states, via remote monitoring. Comparison was via a 100-day control period (late 2019) and seasonal control period (early 2019). The primary outcome was the impact of COVID-19 on ventricular arrhythmia burden. The secondary outcome was correlation with COVID-19 incidence. During the COVID-19 period, 5963 ICD patients underwent remote monitoring, with 16 942 episodes of treated ventricular arrhythmias (2.8 events per 100 patient-days). Ventricular arrhythmia burden progressively declined during COVID-19 (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients with ventricular arrhythmias amongst the high COVID-19 incidence states was significantly reduced compared with those in low incidence states [odds ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-0.69, P < 0.001]. Comparing patients remotely monitored during both COVID-19 and control periods (n = 2458), significantly fewer ventricular arrhythmias occurred during COVID-19 [incident rate ratio (IRR) 0.68, 95% CI 0.58-0.79, P < 0.001]. This difference persisted when comparing the 1719 patients monitored during both the COVID-19 and seasonal control periods (IRR 0.69, 95% CI 0.56-0.85, P < 0.001). Conclusions During COVID-19, there was a 32% reduction in ventricular arrhythmias needing device therapies, coinciding with measures of social isolation. There was a 39% reduction in the proportion of patients with ventricular arrhythmias in states with higher COVID-19 incidence. These findings highlight the potential role of real-life stressors in ventricular arrhythmia burden in individuals with ICDs. [GRAPHICS] .
引用
收藏
页码:520 / 528
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and pregnancy
    Dashraath, Pradip
    Wong, Jing Lin Jeslyn
    Lim, Mei Xian Karen
    Lim, Li Mm
    Li, Sarah
    Biswas, Arijit
    Choolani, Mahesh
    Mattar, Citra
    Su, Lin Lin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (06) : 521 - 531
  • [12] Caring for Miners During the Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic
    Sood, Akshay
    Pollard, Charles
    Suer, Kyla Le
    Vlahovich, Kevin
    Walker, Jolene
    JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2021, 37 (01): : 165 - 168
  • [13] Experiences of New Mothers During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic
    Critchlow, Elizabeth
    Birkenstock, Lyena
    Hotz, Melanie
    Sablone, Lauren
    Riley, Amy Henderson
    Mercier, Rebecca
    Frasso, Rosemary
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 139 (02): : 244 - 253
  • [14] Suggestions on surgical treatment during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic
    Zhao, Zhiming
    Li, Mengyang
    Liu, Rong
    BIOSCIENCE TRENDS, 2020, 14 (03) : 227 - 230
  • [15] Endometrial Cancer Detection During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic
    Suh-Burgmann, Elizabeth J.
    Alavi, Mubarika
    Schmittdiel, Julie
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 136 (04): : 842 - 843
  • [16] Laboratory medicine resilience during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic
    Lippi, Giuseppe
    Plebani, Mario
    ADVANCES IN LABORATORY MEDICINE-AVANCES EN MEDICINA DE LABORATORIO, 2020, 1 (02):
  • [17] The emotional state of population during the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
    Korotkova, Inga
    Iakovleva, Maria
    Shchelkova, Olga
    Eremina, Daria
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 58 : 172 - 172
  • [18] The management of surgical patients during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic
    Spolverato, Gaya
    Capelli, Giulia
    Restivo, Angelo
    Bao, Quoc Riccardo
    Pucciarelli, Salvatore
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    Gronchi, Alessandro
    SURGERY, 2020, 168 (01) : 4 - 10
  • [19] Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, lessons to be learned!
    Islam, Md. Saiful
    Sobur, Md. Abdus
    Akter, Mily
    Nazir, K. H. M. Nazmul Hussain
    Toniolo, Antonio
    Rahman, Md. Tanvir
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED VETERINARY AND ANIMAL RESEARCH, 2020, 7 (02) : 260 - 280
  • [20] A Postmortem Portrait of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic
    Hooper, Jody E.
    Padera, Robert F., Jr.
    Dolhnikoff, Marisa
    Ferraz da Silva, Luiz Fernando
    Duarte-Neto, Amaro Nunes
    Kapp, Meghan E.
    Lacy, J. Matthew
    Mauad, Thais
    Nascimento Saldiva, Paulo Hilario
    Rapkiewicz, Amy, V
    Wolf, Dwayne A.
    Felix, Juan C.
    Benson, Paul
    Shanes, Elisheva
    Gawelek, Kara L.
    Marshall, Desiree A.
    McDonald, Michelle M.
    Muller, William
    Priemer, David S.
    Solomon, Isaac H.
    Zak, Taylor
    Bhattacharjee, Meenakshi B.
    Fu, Lucy
    Gilbert, Andrea R.
    Harper, Holly L.
    Litovsky, Silvio
    Lomasney, Jon
    Mount, Sharon L.
    Reilly, Stephanie
    Sekulic, Miroslav
    Steffensen, Thora S.
    Threlkeld, Kirsten J.
    Zhao, Bihong
    Williamson, Alex K.
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2021, 145 (05) : 529 - 535