Fractal analysis of the galaxy distribution in the redshift range 0.45 ≤ z ≤ 5.0

被引:24
|
作者
Conde-Saavedra, G. [1 ]
Iribarrem, A. [1 ]
Ribeiro, Marcelo B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Observ Valongo, BR-21941 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Inst Fis, BR-21941 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
关键词
Cosmology: galaxy distribution; Large-scale structure of the universe; Fractals: fractal dimension; Power-laws Galaxies: number counts; COSMOLOGY NUMBER DENSITIES; DE-SITTER COSMOLOGY; MAGAZINE SER. 7; RELATIVISTIC COSMOLOGY; LUMINOSITY FUNCTION; GENERAL-RELATIVITY; STANDARD COSMOLOGIES; TOLMAN SPACETIME; SCALE-INVARIANCE; STATISTICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.physa.2014.09.044
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
This paper performs a fractal analysis of the galaxy distribution and presents evidence that it can be described as a fractal system within the redshift range of the FORS Deep Field (FDF) galaxy survey data. The fractal dimension D was derived by means of the galaxy number densities calculated by Iribarrem et al. (2012) using the FDF luminosity function parameters and absolute magnitudes obtained by Gabasch et al. (2004, 2006) in the spatially homogeneous standard cosmological model with Omega(m0) = 0.3, Omega(Lambda 0) = 0.7 and H-0 = 70 km s(-1) Mpc(-1). Under the supposition that the galaxy distribution forms a fractal system, the ratio between the differential and integral number densities gamma and gamma* obtained from the red and blue FDF galaxies provides a direct method to estimate D and implies that gamma and gamma* vary as power-laws with the cosmological distances, feature which provides a second method for calculating D. The luminosity distance d(L) galaxy area distance d(G) and redshift distance d(z) were plotted against their respective number densities to calculate D by linear fitting. It was found that the FDF galaxy distribution is better characterized by two single fractal dimensions at successive distance ranges, that is, two scaling ranges in the fractal dimension. Two straight lines were fitted to the data, whose slopes change at z approximate to 1.3 or z approximate to 1.9 depending on the chosen cosmological distance. The average fractal dimension calculated using gamma* changes from < D > = 1.4(-0.6)(+0.7) to < D > = 0.5(-0.4)(+1.2) for all galaxies. Besides, D evolves with z, decreasing as the redshift increases. Small values of D at high z mean that in the past galaxies and galaxy clusters were distributed much more sparsely and the large-scale structure of the universe was then possibly dominated by voids. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:332 / 344
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A fractal galaxy distribution in a homogeneous universe?
    Durrer, R
    Labini, FS
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 1998, 339 (03) : L85 - L88
  • [32] The relaxation of galaxy clusters at redshift z=0 in IllustrisTNG simulation
    Chao Li
    Ling Zhu
    Rui Guo
    Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2020, 20 (12) : 73 - 81
  • [33] Statistical Analysis of Galaxy Redshift Surveys
    Percival, Will J.
    CLASSIFICATION AND DISCOVERY IN LARGE ASTRONOMICAL SURVEYS, 2008, 1082 : 179 - 185
  • [34] Cosmological constraints from the redshift distribution of galaxy clusters
    Vauclair, SC
    ASTROPHYSICS AND SPACE SCIENCE, 2004, 290 (1-2) : 205 - 213
  • [35] Clustering in galaxy distribution: comparison between redshift surveys
    Montuori, M
    Pietronero, L
    Bottaccio, M
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2002, 305 (1-2) : 242 - 246
  • [36] THE OPTICAL REDSHIFT SURVEY - SAMPLE SELECTION AND THE GALAXY DISTRIBUTION
    SANTIAGO, BX
    STRAUSS, MA
    LAHAV, O
    DAVIS, M
    DRESSLER, A
    HUCHRA, JP
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 446 (02): : 457 - 471
  • [37] The inferred redshift distribution of the faint blue galaxy excess
    Driver, SP
    Couch, WJ
    Phillipps, S
    Windhorst, RA
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 466 (01): : L5 - L8
  • [38] A Catalog of Photometric Redshift and the Distribution of Broad Galaxy Morphologies
    Paul, Nicholas
    Virag, Nicholas
    Shamir, Lior
    GALAXIES, 2018, 6 (02):
  • [39] Cosmological constraints from the redshift distribution of galaxy clusters
    Sebastien C. Vauclair
    Astrophysics and Space Science, 2004, 290 : 205 - 213
  • [40] A giant central red disk galaxy at redshift z=0.76: Challenge to theories of galaxy formation
    Xu, Kun
    Liu, ChengZe
    Jing, YiPeng
    Sawicki, Marcin
    Gwyn, Stephen
    SCIENCE CHINA-PHYSICS MECHANICS & ASTRONOMY, 2021, 64 (07)