Surgical therapy for chronic internal carotid artery occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:12
|
作者
Cao, Genmao [1 ]
Hu, Jie [1 ]
Tian, Qinqin [1 ]
Dong, Honglin [1 ]
Zhang, Wayne W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanxi Med Univ, Hosp 2, Dept Vasc Surg, 382 Wuyi Rd, Taiyuan 030001, Shanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Surg, Div Vasc & Endovasc Surg, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Chronic internal carotid artery occlusion; Surgical therapy; Technical success rate; Neurological function; Ischemic stroke; Death; ENDOVASCULAR RECANALIZATION; 1-YEAR PATENCY; STROKE; SURGERY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1007/s13304-021-01055-x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Chronic internal carotid artery occlusion (CICAO) significantly increases the risk of recurrent stroke. Given unfavorable outcomes, revascularization procedures are not generally recommended for CICAO. In the last several years, loads of studies reported successful surgical revascularization for CICAO with promising success rate and favorable short-term outcomes. Meanwhile, due to the lack of high-quality evidence, the safety and efficacy of revascularization procedures remain debatable. This systematic review aims to scrutinize current evidence for the applicability of revascularization for CICAO. We also investigated potential predictors of postoperative prognosis. We searched clinical studies on surgical treatment of CICAO on the Medline, Cochrane library, and Embase databases, published from Jan 1990 to Jan 2021. Surgical operation was restricted to bypass surgery, endarterectomy, endovascular therapy, and hybrid surgery. Controlled clinical studies were included for clinical outcomes. Large-sample single-arm studies were supplemented to assess complications and success rate. Co-primary endpoints were technical success rate and neurological function; secondary endpoints were recurrent stroke/cerebrovascular events, complications, and deaths within follow-up. This systematic review has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020181250). One RCT and 5 cohort studies with a total of 465 patients were included in this review. Seven single-arm studies were supplemented for assessing success rate and complications. Bypass surgery presented the highest graft patency of 96% and a low incidence of complications, but no benefits on neurological function, recurrent stroke, or deaths. Endovascular therapy (carotid stenting) was characterized by a relatively lower technical success rate, significant neurological function recovery, and nonsignificant reduction of cerebrovascular events and deaths. Hybrid surgery was considered as a potential treatment for CICAO because of a high technical success rate and significant neurological improvement. Endarterectomy is only suitable for short-segment occlusion. Prospective clinical trials should focus on carotid stenting and hybrid surgery for their significant capacity of improving neurologic function and potential capacity of reducing deaths and cerebrovascular events.
引用
收藏
页码:2065 / 2078
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficacy of Willis covered stent of intracranial pseudoaneurysms in the internal carotid artery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lin, Li
    Xiang, Shao-Wei
    Sun, Yan-Ling
    Chen, Yuan
    Wu, Zhe
    Ning, Zhi-Feng
    Shen, Ding-Wen
    Sima, Xue-Qin
    Wen, Qi-Qiang
    Wei, Gui-Lai
    He, Qing-Yong
    JOURNAL OF ACUTE DISEASE, 2023, 12 (05) : 173 - 178
  • [32] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Transradial Access for Carotid Artery Stenting
    Du, Meng
    Hu, Yueyu
    Zhu, Deyuan
    Cao, Wei
    Li, Peng
    Qi, Dayong
    Wu, Chao
    He, Juanling
    Ye, Shifei
    Li, Suya
    Fang, Yibin
    ANGIOLOGY, 2024, 75 (06) : 517 - 526
  • [33] Transcervical carotid artery revascularization: A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes
    Sagris, Marios
    Giannopoulos, Stefanos
    Giannopoulos, Spyridon
    Tzoumas, Andreas
    Texakalidis, Pavlos
    Charisis, Nektarios
    Kokkinidis, Damianos G.
    Malgor, Rafael D.
    Mouawad, Nicolas J.
    Bakoyiannis, Christos
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 74 (02) : 657 - +
  • [34] OUTCOMES OF CORONARY ARTERY PERFORATION IN CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION INTERVENTION- A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Mai, Steven L.
    Hong, Jimmy
    Tomcho, Jeremy C.
    Sweet, Patrick
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 81 (08) : 1222 - 1222
  • [35] Carotid artery stenting in patients with chronic internal carotid artery occlusion
    Myrcha, Piotr
    Gloviczki, Peter
    INTERNATIONAL ANGIOLOGY, 2021, 40 (04) : 297 - 305
  • [36] Impact of Coronary Artery Chronic Total Occlusion on Arrhythmic and Mortality Outcomes A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chi, Wai Kin
    Gong, Mengqi
    Bazoukis, George
    Yan, Bryan P.
    Letsas, Konstantinos P.
    Liu, Tong
    Baranchuk, Adrian
    Nombela-Franco, Luis
    Dong, Mei
    Tse, Gary
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 4 (09) : 1214 - 1223
  • [37] Thrombolytic Therapy for Central Retinal Artery Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Individual Participant Level Meta-Analysis
    Shahjouei, Shima
    Shahripour, Reza Bavarsad
    Dumitrascu, Oana
    ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2023, 94 : S117 - S118
  • [38] Management of Patients with Internal Carotid Artery Near-total Occlusion: An Updated Meta-analysis
    Mylonas, Spyridon N.
    Antonopoulos, Constantine N.
    Moulakakis, Konstantinos G.
    Kakisis, John D.
    Liapis, Christos D.
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 29 (08) : 1664 - 1672
  • [39] Meta-analysis on the primary approach: Aspiration versus stent retrieval for internal carotid artery occlusion
    Li, Jia
    Sun, Lixue
    Jia, Zhenling
    Song, Chaoyan
    Shan, Yuchao
    MEDICINE, 2025, 104 (05)
  • [40] Carotid Artery Endarterectomy versus Carotid Artery Stenting for Restenosis After Carotid Artery Endarterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Texakalidis, Pavlos
    Giannopoulos, Stefanos
    Jonnalagadda, Anil K.
    Kokkinidis, Damianos G.
    Machinis, Theofilos
    Reavey-Cantwell, John
    Armstrong, Ehrin J.
    Jabbour, Pascal
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 115 : 421 - +