Rate of use and effectiveness of oseltamivir in the treatment of influenza illness in high-risk populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:14
|
作者
Shim, So-Jung [1 ]
Chan, Mei [1 ,2 ]
Owens, Louisa [1 ,2 ]
Jaffe, Adam [1 ,2 ]
Prentice, Bernadette [1 ,2 ]
Homaira, Nusrat [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Fac Med, Sch Womens & Childrens Hlth, Discipline Pediat, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Sydney Childrens Hosp Randwick, Resp Dept, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
heart diseases; human; influenza; lung diseases; oseltamivir; SEASONAL INFLUENZA; HOSPITALIZED CHILDREN; COMPLICATIONS; INFECTIONS; BENEFITS; CARE;
D O I
10.1002/hsr2.241
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundOseltamivir is recommended in the treatment of influenza illness in high-risk populations, including those with chronic heart and lung diseases. ObjectivesWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the rate of use and effectiveness of oseltamivir in these groups of patients. MethodsThe protocol for the systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019125998). Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and CINAHL were searched for observational studies and randomized controlled trials published up to 16 February 2020. Quality appraisal of final studies was conducted using GRADE guidelines. Data were extracted using a predeveloped template. Main outcomes measured included the rate of use of oseltamivir for influenza-like-illness and its effectiveness in reducing disease severity in patients with cardiopulmonary diseases. Outcomes measured for effectiveness were influenza-related complications (respiratory infections and asthma exacerbations), hospitalization rates, and time to freedom from illness. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2.0 tool for randomized trials and Cochrane's Risk of Bias in nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool for nonrandomized trials. Where data were available, pooled analyses were conducted. Dichotomous variables were evaluated using the Mantel-Hansel method. A random effect model was applied. Summary measures were reported as risk ratios where relevant. ResultsOur systematic review identified nine studies. Oseltamivir use ranged from 25% to 100%. When oseltamivir group was compared to placebo, rates of respiratory tract infections reduced by 28% (RR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.59-0.90), hospitalization reduced by 52% (RR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.28-0.80) and median time to illness alleviation decreased by 10.4 to 120hours. There was no significant reduction in asthma exacerbation rates. ConclusionsOur systematic review suggests that the use of oseltamivir is beneficial in reducing disease severity, however, its use in high-risk population remains suboptimal.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] High-risk phenotypes of arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Benjanuwattra, Juthipong
    Kewcharoen, Jakrin
    Phinyo, Phichayut
    Swusdinaruenart, Sikarin
    Abdelnabi, Mahmoud
    Del Rio-Pertuz, Gaspar
    Leelaviwat, Natnicha
    Navaravong, Leenhapong
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 2023, 78 (09) : 1012 - 1019
  • [42] Results of surveillance in individuals at high-risk of pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Signoretti, Marianna
    Bruno, Marco J.
    Zerboni, Giulia
    Poley, Jan-Werner
    Delle Fave, Gianfranco
    Capurso, Gabriele
    UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 6 (04) : 489 - 499
  • [43] Poor nutritional condition promotes high-risk behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Moran, Nicholas P.
    Sanchez-Tojar, Alfredo
    Schielzeth, Holger
    Reinhold, Klaus
    BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2021, 96 (01) : 269 - 288
  • [44] Interventions to prevent sPTB in high-risk women: systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Care, A.
    Nevitt, S.
    Medley, N.
    Donegan, S.
    Goodfellow, L.
    Hampson, L.
    Tudur-Smith, C.
    Alfirevic, Z.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 128 : 95 - 95
  • [45] Immediate treatment for recent hepatitis C infection in people with high-risk behaviors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Manoharan, Lakshmi
    Latham, Ned H.
    Munari, Stephanie C.
    Traeger, Michael W.
    Menon, Vinay
    Luhmann, Niklas
    Baggaley, Rachel
    Macdonald, Virginia
    Verster, Annette
    Siegfried, Nandi
    Matthews, Gail V.
    Stoove, Mark
    Hellard, Margaret E.
    Doyle, Joseph S.
    HEPATOLOGY COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 7 (04)
  • [46] Evaluation of Daratumumab for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma in Patients With High-risk Cytogenetic Factors A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Giri, Smith
    Grimshaw, Alyssa
    Bal, Susan
    Godby, Kelly
    Kharel, Prakash
    Djulbegovic, Benjamin
    Dimopoulos, Meletios A.
    Facon, Thierry
    Usmani, Saad Z.
    Mateos, Maria-Victoria
    Costa, Luciano J.
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2020, 6 (11) : 1759 - 1765
  • [47] Effect of different interventions on the treatment of high-risk human papillomavirus infection: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Wang, Dong-Yue
    Cui, Ying-Ying
    Zhang, Wei-Wei
    Fan, Meng-Si
    Qiu, Ke-Xin
    Yan, Li
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [48] The effectiveness of peer support for individuals with mental illness: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Smit, Dorien
    Miguel, Clara
    Vrijsen, Janna N.
    Groeneweg, Bart
    Spijker, Jan
    Cuijpers, Pim
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 53 (11) : 5332 - 5341
  • [49] Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety of baloxavir marboxil versus oseltamivir as the treatment for influenza virus infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shiraishi, Chihiro
    Kato, Hideo
    Hagihara, Mao
    Asai, Nobuhiro
    Iwamoto, Takuya
    Mikamo, Hiroshige
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2024, 30 (03) : 242 - 249
  • [50] Effectiveness of electroacupuncture as a treatment for osteoporosis A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fan, Linyan
    Wu, Zhifang
    Li, Min
    Jiang, Ganghui
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (03) : E24259