共 50 条
Rate of use and effectiveness of oseltamivir in the treatment of influenza illness in high-risk populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis
被引:14
|作者:
Shim, So-Jung
[1
]
Chan, Mei
[1
,2
]
Owens, Louisa
[1
,2
]
Jaffe, Adam
[1
,2
]
Prentice, Bernadette
[1
,2
]
Homaira, Nusrat
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Univ New South Wales, Fac Med, Sch Womens & Childrens Hlth, Discipline Pediat, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Sydney Childrens Hosp Randwick, Resp Dept, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金:
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词:
heart diseases;
human;
influenza;
lung diseases;
oseltamivir;
SEASONAL INFLUENZA;
HOSPITALIZED CHILDREN;
COMPLICATIONS;
INFECTIONS;
BENEFITS;
CARE;
D O I:
10.1002/hsr2.241
中图分类号:
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号:
1004 ;
120402 ;
摘要:
BackgroundOseltamivir is recommended in the treatment of influenza illness in high-risk populations, including those with chronic heart and lung diseases. ObjectivesWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the rate of use and effectiveness of oseltamivir in these groups of patients. MethodsThe protocol for the systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019125998). Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and CINAHL were searched for observational studies and randomized controlled trials published up to 16 February 2020. Quality appraisal of final studies was conducted using GRADE guidelines. Data were extracted using a predeveloped template. Main outcomes measured included the rate of use of oseltamivir for influenza-like-illness and its effectiveness in reducing disease severity in patients with cardiopulmonary diseases. Outcomes measured for effectiveness were influenza-related complications (respiratory infections and asthma exacerbations), hospitalization rates, and time to freedom from illness. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2.0 tool for randomized trials and Cochrane's Risk of Bias in nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool for nonrandomized trials. Where data were available, pooled analyses were conducted. Dichotomous variables were evaluated using the Mantel-Hansel method. A random effect model was applied. Summary measures were reported as risk ratios where relevant. ResultsOur systematic review identified nine studies. Oseltamivir use ranged from 25% to 100%. When oseltamivir group was compared to placebo, rates of respiratory tract infections reduced by 28% (RR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.59-0.90), hospitalization reduced by 52% (RR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.28-0.80) and median time to illness alleviation decreased by 10.4 to 120hours. There was no significant reduction in asthma exacerbation rates. ConclusionsOur systematic review suggests that the use of oseltamivir is beneficial in reducing disease severity, however, its use in high-risk population remains suboptimal.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文