Comparison of HOMER and ACMANT homogenization methods using a central Pyrenees temperature dataset

被引:12
|
作者
Perez-Zanon, N. [1 ]
Sigro, J. [1 ]
Domonkos, P. [1 ]
Ashcroft, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rovira & Virgili, Ctr Climate Change C3, Campus Terres Ebre, Tortosa, Spain
关键词
CLIMATE-CHANGE; SPATIAL VARIABILITY; BENCHMARKING;
D O I
10.5194/asr-12-111-2015
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The aim of this research is to compare the results of two modern multiple break point homogenization methods, namely ACMANT and HOMER, over a Pyrenees temperature dataset in order to detect differences between their outputs which can affect future studies. Both methods are applied to a dataset of 44 monthly maximum and minimum temperature series placed around central Pyrenees and covering the 1910-2013 period. The results indicate that the automatic method ACMANT produces credible results. While HOMER detects more breaks supported by metadata, this method is also more dependent on the user skill and thus sensitive to subjective errors.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 119
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A comparison of different methods to maximise signal extraction when using central venous pressure to optimise atrioventricular delay after cardiac surgery
    Cretu, Ioana
    Tindale, Alexander
    Abbod, Maysam
    Balachandran, Wamadeva
    Khir, Ashraf W.
    Meng, Hongying
    IJC HEART & VASCULATURE, 2024, 51
  • [42] Comparison of methods to derive river water temperature using thermal infrared imagery: A case study of the upper Yangtze River catchment
    Shi, Xi
    Xia, Junqiang
    Sun, Jian
    Hupo Kexue/Journal of Lake Sciences, 2022, 34 (01): : 307 - 319
  • [43] Statistical downscaling of daily temperature and precipitation over China using deep learning neural models: Localization and comparison with other methods
    Sun, Lei
    Lan, Yufeng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2021, 41 (02) : 1128 - 1147
  • [44] SEPARATION OF PARAMAGNETIC AND FERRIMAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITIES USING LOW-TEMPERATURE MAGNETIC-SUSCEPTIBILITIES AND COMPARISON WITH HIGH-FIELD METHODS
    RICHTER, C
    VANDERPLUIJM, BA
    PHYSICS OF THE EARTH AND PLANETARY INTERIORS, 1994, 82 (02) : 113 - 123
  • [45] Comparison of the advanced machine learning methods for better prediction accuracy of solar radiation using only temperature data: A case study
    Mirbolouki, Amin
    Heddam, Salim
    Singh Parmar, Kulwinder
    Trajkovic, Slavisa
    Mehraein, Mojtaba
    Kisi, Ozgur
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 46 (03) : 2709 - 2736
  • [46] Using Deep Neural Network Methods for Forecasting Energy Productivity Based on Comparison of Simulation and DNN Results for Central Poland-Swietokrzyskie Voivodeship
    Pikus, Michal
    Was, Jaroslaw
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (18)
  • [47] Comparison of the DRASTIC plus L and modified VABHAT models in vulnerability assessment of Karaj aquifer, central Iran, using MCDM, SWARA, and BWM methods
    Shakeri, Reza
    Alijani, Farshad
    Nassery, Hamid Reza
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2023, 82 (04)
  • [48] Analytical treatment of fins with temperature-dependent surface heat flux using the homotopy perturbation method and comparison of decomposition and numerical methods
    Ganji, D. D.
    Mostofi, M.
    Delavar, A.
    Kazemi, A.
    HEAT TRANSFER RESEARCH, 2007, 38 (05) : 407 - 415
  • [49] Influence of the stationary phase on the stability of thalidomide and comparison of different methods for the quantification of thalidomide in tablets using high-temperature liquid chromatography
    Giegold, Sascha
    Holzhauser, Maren
    Kiffmeyer, Thekla
    Tuerk, Jochen
    Teutenberg, Thorsten
    Rosenhagen, Maike
    Hennies, Dorothea
    Hoppe-Tichy, Torsten
    Wenclawiak, Bernd
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 2008, 46 (04) : 625 - 630
  • [50] RELEASE OF LEAD AND CADMIUM - COMPARISON OF 2 HOT LEACH METHODS WITH A ROOM-TEMPERATURE METHOD, USING SPECIALLY GLAZED CERAMIC WARE
    GOULD, JH
    BUTLER, SW
    STEELE, EA
    JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF OFFICIAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTS, 1983, 66 (05): : 1112 - 1116