Optimized grouping to increase accuracy of prediction of breeding values based on group records in genomic selection breeding programs

被引:4
|
作者
Chu, Thinh T. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bastiaansen, John W. M. [2 ]
Berg, Peer [1 ,4 ]
Komen, Hans [2 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Ctr Quantitat Genet & Genom, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
[2] Wageningen Univ & Res, Anim Breeding & Genom, NL-6709 PG Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Vietnam Natl Univ Agr, Fac Anim Sci, Hanoi, Vietnam
[4] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Dept Anim & Aquacultural Sci, N-1432 As, Norway
关键词
VARIANCE-COMPONENTS; INFERENCE;
D O I
10.1186/s12711-019-0509-z
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Background Phenotypic records of group means or group sums are a good alternative to individual records for some difficult to measure, but economically important traits such as feed efficiency or egg production. Accuracy of predicted breeding values based on group records increases with increasing relationships between group members. The classical way to form groups with more closely-related animals is based on pedigree information. When genotyping information is available before phenotyping, its use to form groups may further increase the accuracy of prediction from group records. This study analyzed two grouping methods based on genomic information: (1) unsupervised clustering implemented in the STRUCTURE software and (2) supervised clustering that models genomic relationships. Results Using genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) models, estimates of the genetic variance based on group records were consistent with those based on individual records. When genomic information was available to constitute the groups, genomic relationship coefficients between group members were higher than when random grouping of paternal half-sibs and of full-sibs was applied. Grouping methods that are based on genomic information resulted in higher accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) prediction compared to random grouping. The increase was 1.5% for full-sibs and 11.5% for paternal half-sibs. In addition, grouping methods that are based on genomic information led to lower coancestry coefficients between the top animals ranked by GEBV. Of the two proposed methods, supervised clustering was superior in terms of accuracy, computation requirements and applicability. By adding surplus genotyped offspring (more genotyped offspring than required to fill the groups), the advantage of supervised clustering increased by up to 4.5% compared to random grouping of full-sibs, and by 14.7% compared to random grouping of paternal half-sibs. This advantage also increased with increasing family sizes or decreasing genome sizes. Conclusions The use of genotyping information for grouping animals increases the accuracy of selection when phenotypic group records are used in genomic selection breeding programs.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Genomic selection in tree breeding: testing accuracy of prediction models including dominance effect
    Marie Denis
    Jean-Marc Bouvet
    BMC Proceedings, 5 (Suppl 7)
  • [32] Choice of shrinkage parameter and prediction of genomic breeding values in elite maize breeding populations
    Zhao, Yusheng
    Gowda, Manje
    Liu, Wenxin
    Wuerschum, Tobias
    Maurer, Hans P.
    Longin, Friedrich H.
    Ranc, Nicolas
    Piepho, Hans P.
    Reif, Jochen C.
    PLANT BREEDING, 2013, 132 (01) : 99 - 106
  • [33] Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multibreed beef cattle populations derived from deregressed breeding values and phenotypes
    Weber, K. L.
    Thallman, R. M.
    Keele, J. W.
    Snelling, W. M.
    Bennett, G. L.
    Smith, T. P. L.
    McDaneld, T. G.
    Allan, M. F.
    Van Eenennaam, A. L.
    Kuehn, L. A.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2012, 90 (12) : 4177 - 4190
  • [34] Accuracy of Predicted Genomic Breeding Values in Purebred and Crossbred Pigs
    Hidalgo, Andre M.
    Bastiaansen, John W. M.
    Lopes, Marcos S.
    Harlizius, Barbara
    Groenen, Martien A. M.
    de Koning, Dirk-Jan
    G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2015, 5 (08): : 1575 - 1583
  • [35] Phenomic selection in wheat breeding: identification and optimisation of factors influencing prediction accuracy and comparison to genomic selection
    Robert, Pauline
    Auzanneau, Jerome
    Goudemand, Ellen
    Oury, Francois-Xavier
    Rolland, Bernard
    Heumez, Emmanuel
    Bouchet, Sophie
    Le Gouis, Jacques
    Rincent, Renaud
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2022, 135 (03) : 895 - 914
  • [36] Phenomic selection in wheat breeding: identification and optimisation of factors influencing prediction accuracy and comparison to genomic selection
    Pauline Robert
    Jérôme Auzanneau
    Ellen Goudemand
    François-Xavier Oury
    Bernard Rolland
    Emmanuel Heumez
    Sophie Bouchet
    Jacques Le Gouis
    Renaud Rincent
    Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2022, 135 : 895 - 914
  • [37] A comparison of genomic selection methods for breeding value prediction
    Wang, Xin
    Yang, Zefeng
    Xu, Chenwu
    SCIENCE BULLETIN, 2015, 60 (10) : 925 - 935
  • [38] Balancing genomic selection efforts for allogamous plant breeding programs
    Resende, Rafael Tassinari
    JOURNAL OF CROP SCIENCE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2024, 27 (03) : 349 - 358
  • [39] Genomic selection -: basics and perspectives for dairy cattle breeding programs
    Koenig, S.
    Simianer, H.
    ZUCHTUNGSKUNDE, 2008, 80 (01): : 50 - 60
  • [40] Optimization of Swine Breeding Programs Using Genomic Selection with ZPLAN
    Lopez, B. M.
    Kang, H. S.
    Kim, T. H.
    Viterbo, V. S.
    Kim, H. S.
    Na, C. S.
    Seo, K. S.
    ASIAN-AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2016, 29 (05): : 640 - 645