Examining How Internet Users Trust and Access Electronic Health Record Patient Portals: Survey Study

被引:3
|
作者
Yin, Rong [1 ]
Law, Katherine [2 ]
Neyens, David [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, Dept Ind Engn, 100 Freeman Hall, Clemson, SC 29631 USA
[2] Human Factors & User Experience, Mounds View, MN USA
[3] Clemson Univ, Dept Bioengn, Clemson, SC USA
来源
JMIR HUMAN FACTORS | 2021年 / 8卷 / 03期
关键词
internet; consumer health informatics; patient portal; participatory medicine; electronic health records; logistic model; surveys; questionnaires; PRIMARY-CARE; INFORMATION; ADOPTION; OUTCOMES; QUALITY; IMPACT; APPS;
D O I
10.2196/28501
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Electronic health record (EHR) patient portals are designed to provide medical health records to patients. Using an EHR portal is expected to contribute to positive health outcomes and facilitate patient-provider communication. Objective: Our objective was to examine how portal users report using their portals and the factors associated with obtaining health information from the internet. We also examined the desired portal features, factors impacting users' trust in portals, and barriers to using portals. Methods: An internet-based survey study was conducted using Amazon Mechanical Turk. All the participants were adults in the United States who used patient portals. The survey included questions about how the participants used their portals, what factors acted as barriers to using their portals, and how they used and how much they trusted other web-based health information sources as well as their portals. A logistic regression model was used to examine the factors influencing the participants' trust in their portals. Additionally, the desired features and design characteristics were identified to support the design of future portals. Results: A total of 394 participants completed the survey. Most of the participants were less than 35 years old (212/394, 53.8%), with 36.3% (143/394) aged between 35 and 55 years, and 9.9% (39/394) aged above 55 years. Women accounted for 48.5% (191/394) of the survey participants. More than 78% (307/394) of the participants reported using portals at least monthly. The most common portal features used were viewing lab results, making appointments, and paying bills. Participants reported some barriers to portal use including data security and limited access to the internet. The results of a logistic regression model used to predict the trust in their portals suggest that those comfortable using their portals (odds ratio [OR] 7.97, 95% CI 1.11-57.32) thought that their portals were easy to use (OR 7.4, 95% CI 1.12-48.84), and frequent internet users (OR 43.72, 95% CI 1.83-1046.43) were more likely to trust their portals. Participants reporting that the portals were important in managing their health (OR 28.13, 95% CI 5.31-148.85) and that their portals were a valuable part of their health care (OR 6.75, 95% CI 1.51-30.11) were also more likely to trust their portals. Conclusions: There are several factors that impact the trust of EHR patient portal users in their portals. Designing easily usable portals and considering these factors may be the most effective approach to improving trust in patient portals. The desired features and usability of portals are critical factors that contribute to users' trust in EHR portals.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparing Electronic Health Record Portals to Obtain Patient-Entered Family Health History in Primary Care
    Michael F. Murray
    Monica A. Giovanni
    Elissa Klinger
    Elise George
    Lucas Marinacci
    George Getty
    Phyllis Brawarsky
    Beatriz Rocha
    E. John Orav
    David W. Bates
    Jennifer S. Haas
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2013, 28 : 1558 - 1564
  • [22] Patient perspectives on electronic health record accessibility and patient participation: a questionnaire survey
    Vermeir, Peter
    Degroote, Sophie
    Van Tiggelen, Hanne
    Vandijck, Dominique
    Peleman, Renaat
    Verhaeghe, Rik
    Mariman, An
    Vermeersch, Hubert
    Vogelaers, Dirk
    [J]. ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2018, 73 (04) : 292 - 297
  • [23] Comparing Electronic Health Record Portals to Obtain Patient-Entered Family Health History in Primary Care
    Murray, Michael F.
    Giovanni, Monica A.
    Klinger, Elissa
    George, Elise
    Marinacci, Lucas
    Getty, George
    Brawarsky, Phyllis
    Rocha, Beatriz
    Orav, E. John
    Bates, David W.
    Haas, Jennifer S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 28 (12) : 1558 - 1564
  • [24] Using Artificial Intelligence to Predict Patient Electronic Health Record Access Points
    McMoran, D. J.
    O'Malley, Alejandra Maria
    Karamustafaoglu, Aysun
    Fisher, Daniel M.
    Dogan, Gulustan
    [J]. 2022 21ST IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND APPLICATIONS, ICMLA, 2022, : 969 - 973
  • [25] SATISFACTION AMONG USERS OF ELECTRONIC PATIENT ANESTHESIA RECORD IN NEUROLOGICAL INSTITUTE, BANGKOK, THAILAND: A SURVEY
    Naratchariyangkoon, Sirinya
    Hongsranagon, Prathurng
    Havanond, Piyalamporn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH RESEARCH, 2015, 29 : S185 - S191
  • [26] PATIENT USERS OF AN ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD IN A RURAL HEALTH CLINIC: HOWDO EARLY ADOPTING USERS TO EHR TECHNOLOGY COMPARE TO NON-USERS?
    Butler, Jorie M.
    Carter, Marjorie
    Snow, Laverne
    Morales, Jose
    Hayden, Candace
    Gundlapalli, Adi
    Samore, Matthew
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2013, 45 : S129 - S129
  • [27] Electronic Health Record Patient Portal Adoption by Health Care Consumers: An Acceptance Model and Survey
    Tavares, Jorge
    Oliveira, Tiago
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2016, 18 (03)
  • [28] Oncology Patients' Experiences With Novel Electronic Patient Portals to Support Care and Treatment: Qualitative Study With Early Users and Nonusers of Portals in Alberta, Canada
    Santos, Amanda D.
    Caine, Vera
    Robson, Paula J.
    Watson, Linda
    Easaw, Jacob C.
    Petrovskaya, Olga
    [J]. JMIR CANCER, 2021, 7 (04):
  • [29] How patients use access to their electronic GP record-a quantitative study
    Bhavnani, Vanita
    Fisher, Brian
    Winfield, Marlene
    Seed, Paul
    [J]. FAMILY PRACTICE, 2011, 28 (02) : 188 - 194