Translation and validation of the Persian version of the STarT Back Screening Tool in patients with nonspecific low back pain

被引:30
|
作者
Abedi, Mohsen [1 ]
Manshadi, Farideh Dehghan [1 ]
Khalkhali, Minoo [1 ]
Mousavi, Seyed Javad [2 ]
Baghban, Alireza Akbarzadeh [3 ]
Montazeri, Ali [4 ]
Parnianpour, Mohamad [5 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Sch Rehabil Sci, Physiotherapy Dept, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Arthrit & Musculoskeletal Res Grp, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Sch Rehabil Sci, Prote Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[4] Iranian Inst Hlth Sci Res, Dept Mental Hlth, Tehran, Iran
[5] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Ind Engn & Mfg, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
关键词
Validation; STarT Back Screening Tool; Nonspecific low back pain; PHYSICAL-THERAPY; CLASSIFICATION; SUBGROUPS;
D O I
10.1016/j.math.2015.04.006
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To translate the STarT Back Screening Tool (SBT) into Persian and to investigate the psychometric properties of the new version in a group of patients with Non-Specific Low Back Pain (NSLBP). Background: The STarT is a validated questionnaire used for subgrouping LBP patients at three levels of low- ,medium-, and high-risk, based on the risk of chronicity. It has previously been translated and validated in different languages. Methods: The translation and validation of the original questionnaire were carried out in accordance with the standard guidelines. To approve the construct validity, 295 patients with NSLBP completed a questionnaire package. The package comprised of the STarT, Roland-Morris Disability questionnaire (RMDQ), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). To evaluate test-retest reliability, 35 randomly selected NSLBP patients completed the STarT questionnaire within min. 24-hour interval. Results: Factor analysis confirmed two subscales of the STarT. The Cronbach alpha was .83 and .81 for the STarT and the subscale, respectively. This questionnaire showed excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = .85) (p < 0.01). The correlations between the STarT and RMDQ, CSQ, TSK, and the two subscales of HADS were estimated to be .81, .70, .71, .74, and .71, respectively. The Area under the Curve was also calculated for 6 items and the range was between .734 and .860. Conclusions: The Persian version of the STarT is reliable and valid, and consistent with the original questionaire. Therefore, clinicians to subgroup Persian-speaking NSLBP patients can use it. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:850 / 854
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Outcomes of Patients With Acute Low Back Pain Stratified by the STarT Back Screening Tool: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial
    Magel, John
    Fritz, Julie M.
    Greene, Tom
    Kjaer, Per
    Marcus, Robin L.
    Brennan, Gerard P.
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2017, 97 (03): : 330 - 337
  • [32] Validation of the Japanese Version of the Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire in Patients with Low Back Pain
    Nishigami, Tomokiko
    Mibu, Akira
    Tanaka, Katsuyoshi
    Yamashita, Yuh
    Shimizu, Michele Eisemann
    Wand, Benedict M.
    Catley, Mark J.
    Stanton, Tasha R.
    Moseley, G. Lorimer
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2018, 18 (02) : 170 - 179
  • [33] Relationship between STarT Back Screening Tool and prognosis for low back pain patients receiving spinal manipulative therapy
    Field, Jonathan
    Newell, Dave
    CHIROPRACTIC & MANUAL THERAPIES, 2012, 20
  • [34] Relationship between STarT Back Screening Tool and prognosis for low back pain patients receiving spinal manipulative therapy
    Jonathan Field
    Dave Newell
    Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 20 (1)
  • [35] Feasibility of the STarT back screening tool in chiropractic clinics: A cross-sectional study of patients with low back pain
    Kongsted A.
    Johannesen E.
    Leboeuf-Yde C.
    Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 19 (1)
  • [36] Screening for problematic low back pain: STarT
    Robinson, Michael E.
    George, Steven Z.
    PAIN, 2012, 153 (11) : 2159 - 2160
  • [37] Comparing Start Back Screening Tool And OSPRO Yellow Flag Assessment Tool Subgroups In Patients Undergoing Care For Low Back Pain
    Lentz, Trevor A.
    George, Steven Z.
    Rhon, Daniel I.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2023, 24 (04): : 102 - 102
  • [38] The Japanese version of the STarT Back Tool predicts 6-month clinical outcomes of low back pain
    Matsudaira, Ko
    Oka, Hiroyuki
    Kikuchi, Norimasa
    Haga, Yuri
    Sawada, Takayuki
    Tanaka, Sakae
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2017, 22 (02) : 224 - 229
  • [39] The Brazilian version of STarT Back Screening Tool - translation, cross-cultural adaptation and reliability
    Pilz, Bruna
    Vasconcelos, Rodrigo A.
    Marcondes, Freddy B.
    Lodovichi, Samuel S.
    Mello, Wilson
    Grossi, Debora B.
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2014, 18 (05) : 453 - 461
  • [40] Validity and reliability of Turkish version of STarT Back Screening Tool
    Yilmaz Yelvar, Gul Deniz
    Dalkilinc, Murat
    Cirak, Yasemin
    Parlak Demir, Yasemin
    Karaduz, Beyza Nur
    Kolsuz, Mumine Merve
    AGRI-THE JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF ALGOLOGY, 2019, 31 (04): : 163 - 171