Efficiency of the One-Stage Revision Hip Arthroplasty in Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection with Sinus Tract

被引:2
|
作者
Artyukh, Vasily A. [1 ]
Bozhkova, Svetlana A. [1 ]
Boyarov, Andrey A. [1 ]
Muravyova, Julia, V [1 ]
Kochish, Andrey A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vreden Natl Med Res Ctr Traumatol & Orthoped, St Petersburg, Russia
来源
TRAVMATOLOGIYA I ORTOPEDIYA ROSSII | 2021年 / 27卷 / 02期
关键词
periprosthetic joint infection; one-stage revision hip replacement; sinus tract; EXCHANGE; BURDEN;
D O I
10.21823/2311-2905-2021-27-2-9-22
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains the one among the most severe complications of total hip arthroplasty. Presence of sinus tract assosiated with polymicrobial infection development, complexity of bacteriological diagnostics and damage of soft tissues lead to constrictions of one-stage revision hip arthroplasty (RHA). The aim of this study was to assess the influence of draining sinus tract on the outcomes of one-stage RHA in patients with chronic hip PJI. Materials and Methods. A prospective cohort comparative study included 78 patients who underwent one-stage RHA in 2017-2020. Two groups were formed: 48 (61.54%) patients without sinus tract (WST) and 30 (38.45%) patients with sinus tract (ST). Results. The presence of a sinus tract significantly increased the duration of a one-stage RHA in groups of ST and WST (230 and 197.5 min respectively, p = 0.02), as well as blood loss (850 ml and 700 ml, respectively, p = 0.046). Sinus tract was a reliable symptom of soft tissue local infectious inflammation (86.67%, p = 0.00031), fasciitis (36.67%, p = 0.012), purulent cavity (66.67%, p = 0.00027). The structure of the pathogens was comparable. Monobacterial infections predominated in the WST group (82.98%) and in the ST group (77.78%, p = 0.08). In most cases staphylococci were isolated. The median follow-up was 20 months for both groups. The PJI was healed in 93.0% (n = 28) patients in WST group and 82.2% (n = 43) in ST PJI (p>0.05). Postoperative evaluation in the WST and ST groups: HHS 92 and 90 points (p = 0.79), EQ-5D-5L - 0.82 and 0.78 points (p = 0.84) respectively. The proportion of patients who were indicated revision surgery with no PJI association in the ST group exceeded this indicator more than twice according to the WST group 25 and 11.62%, respectively (p>0.05). Conclusion. As a result of the study, there was no statistically significant difference between the outcomes of one-stage RHA in patients with and without sinus tract. Factors such as the anamnesis morbi, the soft tissues condition at the surgical site and the pathogenic microflora characteristics should be taken into account in order to achieve favourable outcomes of surgical treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 22
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] One-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Fistulizing Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip: An Effective Strategy
    Marmor, Simon
    Kerroumi, Younes
    Meyssonnier, Vanina
    Lhotellier, Luc
    Mouton, Antoine
    Graff, Wilfrid
    Zeller, Valerie
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2020, 7
  • [2] Early periprosthetic hip joint infection managed by cementless one-stage revision - a case series
    Riemer, Kristoffer
    Lange, Jeppe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT INFECTION, 2022, 7 (01) : 43 - 50
  • [3] One-stage revision is as effective as two-stage revision for chronic culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection after total hip and knee arthroplasty A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY
    van den Kieboom, J.
    Tirumala, V
    Box, H.
    Oganesyan, R.
    Klemt, C.
    Kwon, Y-M
    [J]. BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2021, 103B (03): : 515 - 521
  • [4] The Influence of Patient Sex on Outcomes Following One-Stage and Two-Stage Revision for Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Total Joint Arthroplasty
    Metcalf, Rory W.
    Rowe, Taylor
    Tersteeg, Megan
    Dombrowski, Malcolm E.
    Odum, Susan
    Otero, Jesse E.
    [J]. ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2023, 12 (09):
  • [5] High re-revision rate following one-stage exchange for streptococcal periprosthetic joint infection of the hip
    Ohlmeier, Malte
    Jachczik, Insa
    Citak, Mustafa
    Gehrke, Thorsten
    Hawi, Nael
    Haasper, Carl
    Abdelaziz, Hussein
    [J]. HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 32 (04) : 488 - 492
  • [6] Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection after hip and knee arthroplasty
    Straub, J.
    Staats, K.
    Vertesich, K.
    Kowalscheck, L.
    Windhager, R.
    Boehler, C.
    [J]. BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2024, 106B (04): : 372 - 379
  • [7] One-Stage Revision for Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Zahar, Akos
    Gehrke, Thorsten A.
    [J]. ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2016, 47 (01) : 11 - +
  • [8] Periprosthetic joint infection in aseptic total hip arthroplasty revision
    Guillaume Renard
    Jean-Michel Laffosse
    Meagan Tibbo
    Thibault Lucena
    Etienne Cavaignac
    Jean-Louis Rouvillain
    Philippe Chiron
    Mathieu Severyns
    Nicolas Reina
    [J]. International Orthopaedics, 2020, 44 : 735 - 741
  • [9] Periprosthetic joint infection in aseptic total hip arthroplasty revision
    Renard, Guillaume
    Laffosse, Jean-Michel
    Tibbo, Meagan
    Lucena, Thibault
    Cavaignac, Etienne
    Rouvillain, Jean-Louis
    Chiron, Philippe
    Severyns, Mathieu
    Reina, Nicolas
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2020, 44 (04) : 735 - 741
  • [10] Do one-stage indications predict success following two-stage arthroplasty for chronic periprosthetic joint infection?
    Kheir, Michael M.
    Anderson, Christopher G.
    Chiu, Yu-Fen
    Carli, Alberto V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT INFECTION, 2024, 9 (01) : 75 - 85