One-stage revision is as effective as two-stage revision for chronic culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection after total hip and knee arthroplasty A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

被引:49
|
作者
van den Kieboom, J. [1 ,2 ]
Tirumala, V [1 ,2 ]
Box, H. [1 ,2 ]
Oganesyan, R. [1 ,2 ]
Klemt, C. [1 ,2 ]
Kwon, Y-M [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Bioengn Lab, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL | 2021年 / 103B卷 / 03期
关键词
SINGLE-STAGE; EXCHANGE; REPLACEMENT; MINIMUM; RISK;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.103B.BJJ-2020-1480.R2
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims Removal of infected components and culture-directed antibiotics are important for the successful treatment of chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, as many as 27% of chronic PJI patients yield negative culture results. Although culture negativity has been thought of as a contraindication to one-stage revision, data supporting this assertion are limited. The aim of our study was to report on the clinical outcomes for one-stage and two-stage exchange arthroplasty performed in patients with chronic culture-negative PJI. Methods A total of 105 consecutive patients who underwent revision arthroplasty for chronic culture-negative PJI were retrospectively evaluated. One-stage revision arthroplasty was performed in 30 patients, while 75 patients underwent two-stage exchange, with a minimum of one year's follow-up. Reinfection, re-revision for septic and aseptic reasons, amputation, readmission, mortality, and length of stay were compared between the two treatment strategies. Results The patient demographic characteristics did not differ significantly between the groups. At a mean follow-up of 4.2 years, the treatment failure for reinfection for one-stage and two-stage revision was five (16.7%) and 15 patients (20.0%) (p = 0.691), and for septic re-revision was four (13.3%) and 11 patients (14.7%) (p = 0.863), respectively. No significant differences were observed between one-stage and two-stage revision for 30- 60- and 90-day readmissions (10.0% vs 8.0%; p = 0.714; 16.7% vs 9.3%; p = 0.325; and 26.7% vs 10.7%; p = 0.074), one-year mortality (3.3% vs 4.0%; p > 0.999), and amputation (3.3% vs 1.3%; p = 0.496). Conclusion In this non-randomized study, one-stage revision arthroplasty demonstrated similar outcomes including reinfection, re-revision, and readmission rates for the treatment of chronic culture-negative PJI after TKA and THA compared to two-stage revision. This suggests culture negativity may not be a contraindication to one-stage revision arthroplasty for chronic culture-negative PJI in selected patients.
引用
收藏
页码:515 / 521
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection after hip and knee arthroplasty
    Straub, J.
    Staats, K.
    Vertesich, K.
    Kowalscheck, L.
    Windhager, R.
    Boehler, C.
    [J]. BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2024, 106B (04): : 372 - 379
  • [2] Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection of the hip: Culture-negative versus culture-positive infection
    Santoso, Asep
    Park, Kyung-Soon
    Shin, Young-Rok
    Yang, Hong-Yeol
    Choi, Ik-Sun
    Yoon, Taek-Rim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2018, 15 (02) : 391 - 395
  • [3] Two-stage revision for the culture-negative infected total hip arthroplasty A COMPARATIVE STUDY
    Ibrahim, M. S.
    Twaij, H.
    Haddad, F. S.
    [J]. BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2018, 100B (01): : 3 - 8
  • [4] Reinfection after two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection of total knee arthroplasty
    Kubista, Bernd
    Hartzler, Robert U.
    Wood, Christina M.
    Osmon, Douglas R.
    Hanssen, Arlen D.
    Lewallen, David G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2012, 36 (01) : 65 - 71
  • [5] Reinfection after two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection of total knee arthroplasty
    Bernd Kubista
    Robert U. Hartzler
    Christina M. Wood
    Douglas R. Osmon
    Arlen D. Hanssen
    David G. Lewallen
    [J]. International Orthopaedics, 2012, 36 : 65 - 71
  • [6] Two-stage revision arthroplasty for coagulase-negative staphylococcal periprosthetic joint infection of the hip and knee
    Veltman, Ewout S.
    Moojen, Dirk Jan F.
    van Ogtrop, Marc L.
    Poolman, Rudolf W.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS, 2019, 10 (10): : 348 - 355
  • [7] Clinical outcomes of two-stage revision for chronic periprosthetic joint infection of the knee: culture-negative versus culture-positive
    Kim, Chang-Wan
    Lee, Chang-Rack
    Park, Dae-Hyun
    Kim, Doo-Yeol
    Kim, Jeong-Woo
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY & RELATED RESEARCH, 2021, 33 (01)
  • [8] Clinical outcomes of two-stage revision for chronic periprosthetic joint infection of the knee: culture-negative versus culture-positive
    Chang-Wan Kim
    Chang-Rack Lee
    Dae-Hyun Park
    Doo-Yeol Kim
    Jeong-Woo Kim
    [J]. Knee Surgery & Related Research, 33
  • [9] Two-stage revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection following total hip arthroplasty
    Fowler, Timothy J.
    Sayers, Adrian
    Whitehouse, Michael R.
    [J]. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2019, 7
  • [10] The Influence of Patient Sex on Outcomes Following One-Stage and Two-Stage Revision for Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Total Joint Arthroplasty
    Metcalf, Rory W.
    Rowe, Taylor
    Tersteeg, Megan
    Dombrowski, Malcolm E.
    Odum, Susan
    Otero, Jesse E.
    [J]. ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2023, 12 (09):