Intellectual property rights policies of higher education institutions (HEIs) in India: a cross-sectional study

被引:2
|
作者
Sattiraju, Vijay Kumar [1 ]
Pandey, Ravi [2 ]
Pallela, Ramjee [3 ]
Sircar, Anindya [4 ]
Ligade, Virendra S. [1 ]
Muragundi, Pradeep M. [1 ]
Janodia, Manthan D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Manipal Acad Higher Educ, Manipal Coll Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Pharm Management, Manipal, Karnataka, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol, Startup Incubat & Innovat Ctr, IPR & Technol Transfer, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
[3] Atal Incubat Ctr CCMB AIC CCMB, COO, Hyderabad, India
[4] Ip Consultant, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
关键词
Intellectual property; Technology transfer; University IP policy; Intellectual property university IP policy; UNIVERSITIES; PROTECTION;
D O I
10.1108/JSTPM-01-2021-0002
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this study is to assess the intellectual property (IP) policy and innovation practices of higher education institutions (HEIs) and to understand the impact of national intellectual property rights (IPR) policy at the ground level. It identifies the barriers of HEIs in the generation of IP, its commercialization and technology transfer. Design/methodology/approach This cross-sectional study aims to understand the innovation practices and IP policy framework of HEIs in India. It was studied in a qualitative approach with a structured questionnaire tool deployed to the top management of HEIs (targeted respondents), using convenience sampling methods. Findings The results imply that IP policies and innovation practices of HEIs in India are evolving and need to align with the global standard as envisaged in the national IPR policy. Lack of commensurate incentives to the inventors, linkages with industries and facilities were found to be major barriers among HEIs and research institutions. Institutional IP policy shall be framed to promote industry linkages with universities resulting in successful IP generation and technology transfer. Research limitations/implications The sample size in this study is less; however, it does not have an impact on the study outcome, as it is a qualitative approach. Practical implications This study brings awareness among stakeholders of IP generation and commercialization regarding the barriers and needed changes to overcome them through policy. Social implications It helps policymakers to redesign the tools of IP and innovation policy to enable the innovation promotion at HEIs. This study identifies innovation practices and institutional barriers in the generation of IP. Originality/value This qualitative survey-based study helps in understanding the innovation practices of HEIs in India. It also aims to identify the barriers of HEIs on the generation and commercialization of IP.
引用
收藏
页码:837 / 848
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The impacts of implementation of National Essential Medicines Policies on primary healthcare institutions: a cross-sectional study in China
    Zhigang Guo
    Xiaodong Guan
    Luwen Shi
    BMC Health Services Research, 17
  • [32] Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among workers of the public higher education institutions of Porto, Portugal: a cross-sectional study
    Meireles, Paula
    Amaro, Joana
    da Costa, Joana Pinto
    Lopes, Mariana Mendes
    Varandas, Tatiana
    Norton, Pedro
    Guimaraes, Joao Tiago
    Severo, Milton
    Barros, Henrique
    OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2021, 78 (09) : 648 - 653
  • [33] Institutions and capacity building for the evolution of Intellectual Property Rights regime in India: III - Conformity and enforcement issues
    Kochhar, Sudhir
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS, 2008, 13 (03): : 239 - 244
  • [34] Generic competence among health sciences students in higher education - A cross-sectional study
    Pramila-Savukoski, Sari
    Jarva, Erika
    Kuivila, Heli-Maria
    Juntunen, Jonna
    Koskenranta, Miro
    Kaariainen, Maria
    Mikkonen, Kristina
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2024, 133
  • [35] Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy in Portugal: A Cross-Sectional Study in Higher Education Students
    Ribeiro, Maria I. B.
    Lopes, Isabel M.
    Fernandes, Antonio J. G.
    Diniz, Francisco J. L. S.
    VISION 2025: EDUCATION EXCELLENCE AND MANAGEMENT OF INNOVATIONS THROUGH SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE, 2019, : 11 - 23
  • [36] The prevalence of depression among students in higher education institution: a repeated cross-sectional study
    Cheong, Wei Shan
    Degeras, Karunanithy
    Suliman, Khairul Rizuan
    Selvaraju, Mohan
    Subramaniam, Kavitha
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC MENTAL HEALTH, 2022, 21 (04) : 331 - 340
  • [37] An Analysis of the Forms of Commercialization of Intellectual Property Objects of Higher Education Institutions: Russian and International Experience
    Kulyagina, E. A.
    Kolozhvari, Yu B.
    Koval, S., V
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE - FAR EAST CON (ISCFEC 2020), 2020, 128 : 617 - 625
  • [38] Catatonia education in France: A cross-sectional study
    d'Intignano, L. Majnoni
    Granon, O.
    Fovet, T.
    Thomas, P.
    Bonin, B.
    Amad, A.
    ENCEPHALE-REVUE DE PSYCHIATRIE CLINIQUE BIOLOGIQUE ET THERAPEUTIQUE, 2019, 45 (05): : 391 - 396
  • [39] Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA) implementation in education institutions in India: A cross sectional study
    Pradhan, Akash
    Oswell, Kunal
    Padhan, Asim
    Seth, Sanjay
    Sarin, Ashima
    Sethuraman, Lakshman
    Sebastian, Paul
    Purushotham, Arnie
    TOBACCO PREVENTION & CESSATION, 2020, 6 : 1 - 7
  • [40] Prevalence of dementia in people with intellectual disabilities: Cross-sectional study
    Takenoshita, Shintaro
    Terada, Seishi
    Kuwano, Ryozo
    Inoue, Tomokazu
    Cyoju, Atsushi
    Suemitsu, Shigeru
    Yamada, Norihito
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 35 (04) : 414 - 422