Patient-Reported Outcomes for Fractures of the Acetabulum: A Comparison Between Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System and Traditional Instruments

被引:7
|
作者
Schumaier, Adam P. [1 ]
Matar, Robert N. [1 ]
Ramalingam, Wendy G. [1 ]
Archdeacon, Michael T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Orthopaed & Sports Med, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
关键词
MUSCULOSKELETAL FUNCTION ASSESSMENT; COMPUTER ADAPTIVE TEST; PROMIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; ORTHOPEDICS; PERFORMANCE; SHOULDER; SF-36;
D O I
10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-01324
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: The objective of this study was to compare instruments from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS) with previously validated acetabulum fracture outcome instruments. Methods: This study included adult patients presenting for routine follow-up at least 3 months after surgical treatment of an acetabulum fracture. Participants completed four different patient-reported outcomes in a randomized order: PROMIS Mobility, PROMIS Physical Function, Short Form 36 (SF-36), and Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA). Primary outcomes were the correlations between instruments, floor/ceiling effects, and survey completion time. The effects of age, education, and race on survey completion time were also evaluated. Results: Overall strong correlations were observed between PROMIS instruments and the SMFA/SF-36 (r = 0.73 to 0.86, P < 0.05) with weaker, more moderate correlations in those with >18 months of follow-up (r = 0.41 to 0.76, P < 0.05). No instruments demonstrated notable floor or ceiling effects. The PROMIS outcomes required less time to complete (PROMIS [56 to 59 seconds] than SF-36 [5 minutes 22 seconds] and SMFA [6 minutes 35 seconds]; P < 0.001). Older individuals required more time to complete the PROMIS PF (0.5 s/yr, P = 0.03), SF-36 (2.35 s/yr, P = 0.01), and SMFA (3.85 s/yr, P < 0.01). Level of education did not affect completion time; however, African Americans took significantly longer than Caucasians to complete the SMFA and SF-36 by 151 and 164 seconds (P < 0.01). Conclusion: This study supports that the PROMIS Mobility and Physical Function surveys are much more efficient instruments for evaluating patients with acetabulum fractures when compared with the SMFA and SF-36. Convergent validity of the PROMIS instruments was overall strong but weaker and more moderate in those with a long-term follow-up, and additional study is suggested for longer-term outcomes. Level of education did not influence survey completion time; however, it took markedly longer time for older individuals and African Americans to complete the SMFA and SF-36.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:71 / 78
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Patients With CKD: The Case for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Tools
    Tang, Evan
    Yantsis, Alyssa
    Ho, Matthew
    Hussain, Junayd
    Dano, Sumaya
    Aiyegbusi, Olalekan L.
    Peipert, John D.
    Mucsi, Istvan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2024, 83 (04) : 508 - 518
  • [42] Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System and Legacy Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the Field of Orthopaedics: A Systematic Review
    Fidai, Mohsin S.
    Saltzman, Bryan M.
    Meta, Fabien
    Lizzio, Vincent A.
    Stephens, Jeffrey P.
    Bozic, Kevin J.
    Makhni, Eric C.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2018, 34 (02): : 605 - 614
  • [43] Patient-Reported Outcomes, Patient-Reported Information From Randomized Controlled Trials to the Social Web and Beyond
    Baldwin, Mike
    Spong, Andrew
    Doward, Lynda
    Gnanasakthy, Ari
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2011, 4 (01): : 11 - 17
  • [44] PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES MEASUREMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROMIS): USING NEW THEORY AND TECHNOLOGY TO IMPROVE MEASUREMENT OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES IN CLINICAL RESEARCH
    Czajkowski, Susan M.
    Cella, David
    Stone, Arthur A.
    Amtmann, Dagmar
    Keefe, Francis
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2010, 39 : 46 - 46
  • [45] PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES MEASUREMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROMIS): USING NEW THEORY AND TECHNOLOGY TO IMPROVE MEASUREMENT OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES IN CLINICAL RESEARCH
    Czajkowski, Susan M.
    Riley, William
    Pilkonis, Paul A.
    Weinfurt, Kevin P.
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2011, 41 : S145 - S145
  • [46] The Association Between Patient Satisfaction and Patient-Reported Health Outcomes
    Chen, Qinyu
    Beal, Eliza W.
    Okunrintemi, Victor
    Cerier, Emily
    Paredes, Anghela
    Sun, Steven
    Olsen, Griffin
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT EXPERIENCE, 2019, 6 (03): : 201 - 209
  • [47] Patient-Reported Outcomes in Surgical Oncology: An Overview of Instruments and Scores
    Joseph D. Phillips
    Sandra L. Wong
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2020, 27 : 45 - 53
  • [48] Review of the patient-reported outcomes instruments in ischemic heart disease
    Pardo, Yolanda
    Oriol, Cristina
    Vilagut, Gemma
    Alayo, Itxaso
    Zamora, Victor
    Ferrer, Montserrat
    Garin, Olatz
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (SUPPL 1) : S151 - S152
  • [49] Use of BiblioPRO, the virtual library of Patient-Reported outcomes instruments
    Pardo, Yolanda
    Ferrer, Montserrat
    Avila, Monica
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2014, 23 : 136 - 137
  • [50] Patient-Reported Outcomes in Surgical Oncology: An Overview of Instruments and Scores
    Phillips, Joseph D.
    Wong, Sandra L.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (01) : 45 - 53