Neural dynamics of visual and semantic object processing

被引:8
|
作者
Clarke, Alex [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Psychol, Cambridge, England
来源
KNOWLEDGE AND VISION | 2019年 / 70卷
关键词
FEATURE-BASED STATISTICS; PERIRHINAL CORTEX; TIME-COURSE; CONCEPTUAL STRUCTURE; TEMPORAL CORTEX; REPRESENTATIONS; RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; SCENE; CATEGORIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/bs.plm.2019.03.002
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Recognizing objects involves the processing of visual properties and the activation of semantic information. This process is known to rely on the ventral visual pathway extending into the anterior and medial temporal lobes. Building on the established neural architecture supporting object recognition, I argue that we need dynamic accounts that can explain the speed of recognition and incorporate feedforward and recurrent processing dynamics. In order to explain recognition, we need explicit models of visual and semantic processing, situated at the level of individual objects, and methods to apply such models to time-resolved neuroimaging data. Here, I outline a computational and cognitive approach to modeling the incremental visual and semantic properties with a neural network, before providing an account of how we access meaning from visual inputs over time. I argue an early phase of processing extracts coarse meaning from visual properties, before long-range recurrent processing dynamics enable the formation of more specific conceptual representations beyond 150ms. Various sources of evidence underlie the importance of feedback for detailed conceptual representations, with connectivity between the anterior temporal and posterior temporal regions playing a major role. Finally, I will discuss how the nature of the task impacts the processing dynamics, and discuss the role the environmental context could play.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 95
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An integrative model for neural dynamics of feature selection in visual object processing: An explorative study
    Hartjen, Berit
    Mueller, Matthias M.
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 59 (07)
  • [2] Effects of perceptual learning on the dynamics of visual object processing
    Worden, A
    Sigman, M
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, : 145 - 145
  • [3] VISUAL OBJECT PROCESSING IN OPTIC APHASIA - A CASE OF SEMANTIC ACCESS AGNOSIA
    RIDDOCH, MJ
    HUMPHREYS, GW
    COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 4 (02) : 131 - 185
  • [4] The relative contributions of visual and semantic information in the neural representation of object categories
    Victoria, Lindsay W.
    Pyles, John A.
    Tarr, Michael J.
    BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, 2019, 9 (10):
  • [5] The neural correlates of the body-object interaction effect in semantic processing
    Hargreaves, Ian S.
    Leonard, GemmaA.
    Pexman, Penny M.
    Pittman, Daniel J.
    Siakaluk, Paul D.
    Goodyear, Bradley G.
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 6
  • [6] The neural basis of visual dominance in the context of audio-visual object processing
    Schmid, Carmen
    Buechel, Christian
    Rose, Michael
    NEUROIMAGE, 2011, 55 (01) : 304 - 311
  • [7] More than a feeling: The bidirectional convergence of semantic visual object and somatosensory processing
    Ekstrand, Chelsea
    Neudorf, Josh
    Lorentz, Eric
    Gould, Layla
    Mickleborough, Marla
    Borowsky, Ron
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2017, 181 : 1 - 9
  • [8] Visual object recognition in early Alzheimer's disease:: deficits in semantic processing
    Laatu, S
    Revonsuo, A
    Jäykkä, H
    Portin, R
    Rinne, JO
    ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2003, 108 (02): : 82 - 89
  • [9] NEURAL MARKERS OF ABERRANT VISUAL PROCESSING DURING OBJECT DETECTION IN PSYCHOSIS
    Longenecker, Julia
    Hollowell, Christopher
    Kang, Seung Suk
    Olman, Cheryl
    Sponheim, Scott
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 55 : S81 - S81
  • [10] The ventral visual pathway: an expanded neural framework for the processing of object quality
    Kravitz, Dwight J.
    Saleem, Kadharbatcha S.
    Baker, Chris I.
    Ungerleider, Leslie G.
    Mishkin, Mortimer
    TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2013, 17 (01) : 26 - 49