Can We Help Patients Forget Their Joint? Determining a Threshold for Successful Outcome for the Forgotten Joint Score

被引:37
|
作者
Rosinsky, Philip J. [1 ]
Chen, Jeffrey W. [1 ]
Lall, Ajay C. [1 ]
Shapira, Jacob [1 ]
Maldonado, David R. [1 ]
Domb, Benjamin G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Amer Hip Inst, 999 Touhy Ave,Suite 450, Des Plaines, IL 60018 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2020年 / 35卷 / 01期
关键词
total hip arthroplasty; threshold; outcome; Forgotten Joint Score; accuracy; REPORTED OUTCOMES; TOTAL HIP; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; OSTEOARTHRITIS; VALIDATION; RELIABILITY; REPLACEMENT; AWARENESS; SOCIETY; STATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2019.08.014
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Clinically important thresholds improve interpretability of patient-reported outcomes. A threshold for a successful outcome does not exist for the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS). The purpose of this study is to determine a threshold score for the FJS, 1 and 2 years after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: A retrospective analysis of 247 primary THA recipients between December 2012 and April 2017 was performed. A binary "successful treatment" was defined as achieving a composite criterion of pain, function, and satisfaction. Receiver operator characteristic analysis determined thresholds for successful outcome at 1 and 2 years postoperatively, subanalyzed by demographics. Results were validated by a 75th centile comparison. The ceiling effect of FJS was also assessed. Results: The average FJS was 70.06 +/- 29.39 and 75.05 +/- 28.73 at 1 and 2 years, respectively (P < .001). The proportion of patients meeting the composite criteria for success was 66.8% at 1 year and 76.5% at 2 years (P = .017). The receiver operator characteristic analysis for FJS at 1 and 2 years yielded excellent accuracy as defined by area under the curve (0.91 and 0.92, respectively). The threshold values were 73.96 and 69.79 at the respective time points. A mild ceiling effect was found with 16% and 23% of cases achieving a score of 100 at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Conclusion: The FJS has excellent accuracy in demonstrating successful outcome following THA. The FJS threshold for success at 1 and 2 years postoperatively is 73.96 and 69.79, respectively. The higher rates of success at 2 years, along with a rise in the mean FJS, may indicate continued clinical improvement up to 2 years after THA. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 159
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Development of a novel patient-reported outcome measure: The computer-adaptive 'Forgotten Joint Score Shoulder'
    Giesinger, Karlmeinrad
    Giesinger, Johannes
    Kesterke, Nicolas
    Hamilton, David
    Holzner, Bernhard
    Jost, Bernhard
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2015, 145 : 35S - 35S
  • [22] How Should We Define Meaningful Improvement? A Commentary on Minimal Clinically Important Difference Assessment for Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement in Total Joint Arthroplasty
    Omran, Kareem
    Schwarzkopf, Ran
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2025, 40 (03): : 545 - 549
  • [23] The Forgotten Joint Score-12 as a valuable patient-reported outcome measure for patients after first-time patellar dislocation
    Ladurner, Andreas
    Giesinger, Karlmeinrad
    Zdravkovic, Vilijam
    Behrend, Henrik
    KNEE, 2020, 27 (02): : 406 - 413
  • [24] Simplified Chinese version of the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS']JS) for patients who underwent joint arthroplasty: cross-cultural adaptation and validation
    Cao, Shiqi
    Liu, Ning
    Han, Wuxiang
    Zi, Yunpeng
    Peng, Fan
    Li, Lexiang
    Fu, Qiwei
    Chen, Yi
    Zheng, Weijie
    Qian, Qirong
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2017, 12
  • [25] How Can We Predict the Successful Outcome After Treatment in Achalasia Patients?
    Hong, Su Jin
    JOURNAL OF NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2012, 18 (04) : 452 - 454
  • [26] Evaluation of the Validity and Reliability of a Persian Version of the Forgotten Joint Score in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Ramezani, Keyvan
    Sarzaeem, Mohammad Mahdi
    Feizi, Davud
    Bonakdar, Moein
    Ramezani, Mitra
    Sarzaeem, Mahdi
    Movahedinia, Mohammad
    ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-ABJS, 2023, 11 (12): : 752 - 756
  • [27] Responsiveness and ceiling effects of the Oxford Hip Score and the Forgotten Joint Score-12 in patients after total hip arthroplasty
    Gerhard, Pascal
    Giesinger, Johannes
    Hamilton, David
    Howie, Colin
    Seiler, Nico
    Giesinger, Karlmeinrad
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2015, 145 : 74S - 74S
  • [28] VALIDATION OF THE ENGLISH VERSION OF THE FORGOTTEN JOINT SCORE-12 IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING TOTAL KNEE OR HIP ARTHROPLASTY
    Giesinger, J. M.
    Loth, T. L.
    Howie, C.
    Giesinger, K.
    Hamilton, D. T.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (07) : A652 - A652
  • [29] Validation of the English language Forgotten Joint Score-12 as an outcome measure for total hip and knee arthroplasty in a British population
    Hamilton, D. F.
    Loth, F. L.
    Giesinger, J. M.
    Giesinger, K.
    MacDonald, D. J.
    Patton, J. T.
    Simpson, A. H. R. W.
    Howie, C. R.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2017, 99B (02): : 218 - 224
  • [30] Content Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of the Forgotten Joint Score Questionnaire in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Mirghaderi, Seyed Peyman
    Raeini, Amirhossein Ghaseminejad
    Gholamshahi, Hediye
    Mortazavi, Seyed Mohammad Javad
    Shafiei, Seyyed Hossein
    Sheikhvatan, Mehrdad
    ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2022, 15 : 40 - 42