Can We Help Patients Forget Their Joint? Determining a Threshold for Successful Outcome for the Forgotten Joint Score

被引:37
|
作者
Rosinsky, Philip J. [1 ]
Chen, Jeffrey W. [1 ]
Lall, Ajay C. [1 ]
Shapira, Jacob [1 ]
Maldonado, David R. [1 ]
Domb, Benjamin G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Amer Hip Inst, 999 Touhy Ave,Suite 450, Des Plaines, IL 60018 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2020年 / 35卷 / 01期
关键词
total hip arthroplasty; threshold; outcome; Forgotten Joint Score; accuracy; REPORTED OUTCOMES; TOTAL HIP; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; OSTEOARTHRITIS; VALIDATION; RELIABILITY; REPLACEMENT; AWARENESS; SOCIETY; STATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2019.08.014
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Clinically important thresholds improve interpretability of patient-reported outcomes. A threshold for a successful outcome does not exist for the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS). The purpose of this study is to determine a threshold score for the FJS, 1 and 2 years after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: A retrospective analysis of 247 primary THA recipients between December 2012 and April 2017 was performed. A binary "successful treatment" was defined as achieving a composite criterion of pain, function, and satisfaction. Receiver operator characteristic analysis determined thresholds for successful outcome at 1 and 2 years postoperatively, subanalyzed by demographics. Results were validated by a 75th centile comparison. The ceiling effect of FJS was also assessed. Results: The average FJS was 70.06 +/- 29.39 and 75.05 +/- 28.73 at 1 and 2 years, respectively (P < .001). The proportion of patients meeting the composite criteria for success was 66.8% at 1 year and 76.5% at 2 years (P = .017). The receiver operator characteristic analysis for FJS at 1 and 2 years yielded excellent accuracy as defined by area under the curve (0.91 and 0.92, respectively). The threshold values were 73.96 and 69.79 at the respective time points. A mild ceiling effect was found with 16% and 23% of cases achieving a score of 100 at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Conclusion: The FJS has excellent accuracy in demonstrating successful outcome following THA. The FJS threshold for success at 1 and 2 years postoperatively is 73.96 and 69.79, respectively. The higher rates of success at 2 years, along with a rise in the mean FJS, may indicate continued clinical improvement up to 2 years after THA. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 159
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Determining the Validity, Reliability, and Utility of the Forgotten Joint Score: A Systematic Review
    Adriani, Marco
    Malahias, Michael-Alexander
    Gu, Alex
    Kahlenberg, Cynthia A.
    Ast, Michael P.
    Sculco, Peter K.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (04): : 1137 - 1144
  • [2] Can Patients Forget Their Artificial Joint after Arthroplasty?
    Kinikli, Gizem Irem
    Guney, Hande
    Onal, Sercan
    Sarial, Ceyda
    Donder, Dilara
    Yuksel, Inci
    Caglar, Omur
    Kinikli, Gulay
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2015, 67
  • [3] Forgotten Joint Score Thresholds for Forgotten Joint Status and Patient Satisfaction after Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Chinese Patients
    Wang, Zhaolun
    Deng, Wang
    Shao, Hongyi
    Zhou, Yixin
    Li, Hua
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (10): : 2825 - 2829
  • [4] The Comprehensive Care Joint Replacement Model How Can We Help Our Patients?
    Walsh, Colleen
    ORTHOPAEDIC NURSING, 2016, 35 (06) : 357 - 358
  • [5] RASCH ANALYSIS OF THE FORGOTTEN JOINT SCORE IN PATIENTS WITH TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY
    Stano, Flavia
    Pellicciari, Leonardo
    La Porta, Fabio
    Piscitelli, Daniele
    Angilecchia, Domenico
    Signorelli, Maria
    Giovannico, Giuseppe
    Pournajaf, Sanaz
    Caselli, Serena
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2024, 56
  • [6] Rasch analysis of the Forgotten Joint Score in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty
    Didier D. Niama Natta
    Emmanuel Thienpont
    Alexandre Bredin
    Gwenael Salaun
    Christine Detrembleur
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2019, 27 : 1984 - 1991
  • [7] Rasch analysis of the Forgotten Joint Score in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty
    Natta, Didier D. Niama
    Thienpont, Emmanuel
    Bredin, Alexandre
    Salaun, Gwenael
    Detrembleur, Christine
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2019, 27 (06) : 1984 - 1991
  • [8] The Forgotten Joint Score Is a Valid Outcome Measure for Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study
    Mazzotti, Antonio
    Zielli, Simone Ottavio
    Artioli, Elena
    Astolfi, Michele
    Langone, Laura
    Faldini, Cesare
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2024, 482 (10) : 1813 - 1821
  • [9] Validating the forgotten joint score-12 in patients after ACL reconstruction
    Behrend, Henrik
    Giesinger, Karlmeinrad
    Zdravkovic, Vilijam
    Giesinger, Johannes M.
    KNEE, 2017, 24 (04): : 768 - 774
  • [10] Forgotten Joint Score for early outcome assessment after total knee arthroplasty: Is it really useful?
    Qunn Jid Lee
    Wai Yee Esther Chang
    Yiu Chung Wong
    Knee Surgery & Related Research, 32