Dosimetric comparison of three different treatment techniques for extensive scalp lesion irradiation

被引:0
|
作者
Wojcicka, J. [1 ]
Lasher, D. [1 ]
Bialkowski, M. [1 ]
McAfee, S. [1 ]
Fortier, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] York Canc Ctr, York, PA, England
关键词
D O I
10.1118/1.2760832
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Homogeneous scalp irradiation poses technical and dosimetric challenges due to the complex shape of the target. The purpose of this study is to compare conventional electron/photon therapy, photon IMRT, and HDR brachytherapy for treatment of extensive scalp lesions. Method and Materials: A 73‐year‐old man presented with extensive squamous cell carcinoma of the scalp. A custom helmet‐shaped mold was made and the target area delineated. The following three treatment methods were evaluated: a 3D plan using lateral photon/electron fields with moving junctions, an IMRT plan using seven coplanar beams, and a brachytherapy plan with catheters placed on the outer side of the mold. All plans were created for the same biological effective doses of 60 Gy. TLDs were used to verify the accuracy of the analyzed techniques. Coverage factors, dose conformity indexes, global conformity indexes, minimum, maximum and mean doses were presented for the scalp and critical structures including the brain and eyes. Results: Dosimetry parameters were normalized to 95% of prescription dose. Clinical target volume coverage factors in electron/photon, IMRT and HDR techniques were 0.976, 0.998, 0.957, and target conformity indexes were 1.98, 1.67, and 1.38, respectively. The dose gradient across the target was 59–136%, 91–129%, and 58–242% for electron/photon, IMRT, and HDR techniques, respectively. The lowest maximum dose to the eyes was achieved with external beam techniques. HDR produced the lowest maximum dose to brain, while IMRT irradiated the least amount of brain above 45 Gy. The measurements agreed within 5% of the calculated doses. Conclusion: IMRT provided better dose homogeneity and target coverage, and delivered lower doses to normal structures than the other techniques. While dose inhomogeneity in the target region was higher in HDR, this technique produced the most conformal plan. Therefore, our department selected IMRT and HDR for extensive scalp lesion treatment. © 2007, American Association of Physicists in Medicine. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2440 / 2441
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dosimetric comparison of three different treatment techniques in extensive scalp lesion irradiation
    Wojcicka, Jadwiga B.
    Lasher, Donette E.
    McAfee, Sandra S.
    Fortier, Gregory A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2009, 91 (02) : 255 - 260
  • [2] Dosimetric comparison of three different external beam whole breast irradiation techniques
    Gursel, Bilge
    Meydan, Deniz
    Ozbek, Nilgun
    Ofluoglu, Tenzile
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2011, 28 (12) : 1114 - 1125
  • [3] Dosimetric comparison of three different external beam whole breast irradiation techniques
    Bilge Gursel
    Deniz Meydan
    Nilgun Ozbek
    Tenzile Ofluoglu
    Advances in Therapy, 2011, 28 : 1114 - 1125
  • [4] Dosimetric Comparison of Several Radiotherapy Techniques in the Treatment of Scalp Cancer
    Schulze, D.
    Zhang, H.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E429 - E429
  • [5] Dosimetric Comparison of Craniospinal Irradiation Using Different Tomotherapy Techniques
    Zhang, X.
    Penagaricano, J.
    Han, E.
    Liang, X.
    Morrill, S.
    Hardee, M.
    Gupta, S.
    Vaneerat, R.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 310 - 310
  • [6] Dosimetric Comparison of Craniospinal Irradiation Using Different Tomotherapy Techniques
    Zhang, X.
    Penagaricano, J.
    Han, E. Y.
    Morrill, S.
    Hardee, M.
    Liang, X.
    Gupta, S. K.
    Corry, P. M.
    Ratanatharathom, V.
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2015, 14 (04) : 440 - 446
  • [7] Dosimetric comparison of integral dose for different techniques of craniospinal irradiation
    Goswami, Brijesh
    Jain, Rakesh Kumar
    Yadav, Suresh
    Kumar, Sunil
    Oommen, Saji
    Manocha, Sapna
    Jadav, Genesh K.
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2021, 20 (03) : 345 - 350
  • [8] Dosimetric comparison of different radiotherapy techniques for the treatment of Retinoblastoma
    Nath, Jyotiman
    Goswami, Pranjal
    Medhi, Partha Pratim
    Sarma, Gautam
    Kalita, Apurba Kumar
    Bhattacharyya, Mouchumee
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2022, 21 (02) : 159 - 164
  • [9] Dosimetric comparison of three different radiotherapy techniques (3DCRT, ECOMP & VMAT) for breast irradiation
    Trivedi, G.
    Oinam, A. S.
    Yadav, B. Singh
    Vasudeva, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2021, 19 (02): : 371 - 379
  • [10] Dosimetric Comparison of Three Arc Techniques in Prostate Treatment Planning
    Jiang, L.
    Rule, W.
    Solberg, T.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)