Establishing Clinically Significant Outcomes for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System After Biceps Tenodesis

被引:15
|
作者
Forlenza, Enrico M. [1 ]
Lu, Yining [1 ]
Cohn, Matthew R. [1 ]
Baker, James [1 ]
Lavoie-Gagne, Ophelie [1 ]
Yanke, Adam B. [1 ]
Cole, Brian J. [1 ]
Verma, Nikhil N. [1 ]
Forsythe, Brian [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, 1611 W Harrison St, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PREOPERATIVE OPIOID USE; IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; IMPROVEMENT; PROMIS; HEALTH; WOMAC; SCORE; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2020.12.236
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To establish thresholds for improvement in patient-reported outcome scores that correspond with clinically significant outcomes (CSOs) including the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper extremity (UE) computer adaptive testing (CAT) and pain interference (PIF) CAT after biceps tenodesis (BT) and to assess patient variables that are associated with achieving these outcomes. Methods: After institutional review board approval was obtained, a prospectively maintained institutional database was queried for patients undergoing BT between December 2017 and August 2019. Patients undergoing BT in isolation or BT in conjunction with rotator cuff debridement, SLAP repair, subacromial decompression, or distal clavicle excision were included in the analysis. Anchor- and distribution-based methods were used to calculate the MCID whereas an anchor-based method was used to calculate SCB and the PASS for PROMIS UE CAT and PIF CAT. Results: A total of 112 patients (86.8% follow-up) who underwent BT were included for analysis. The MCID, net SCB, absolute SCB, and PASS for PROMIS UE CAT were 4.02, 9.25, 43.4, and 41.1, respectively. The MCID, net SCB, absolute SCB, and PASS for PROMIS PIF CAT were -4.12, -10.7, 52.4, and 52.4, respectively. Higher preoperative UE CAT and PIF CAT scores, preoperative opioid use, depression, and living alone were negative predictors of CSO achievement. Male sex and regular participation in exercise were positive predictors of CSO achievement. Conclusions: Patients with higher preoperative UE scores were less likely to achieve the MCID (odds ratio [OR], 0.84), whereas patients with higher preoperative PIF scores were less likely to achieve absolute SCB and the PASS (OR, 0.83-0.89). Most patients achieved the MCID for PIF CAT (70.5%) and UE CAT (62.5%) at final follow-up. Male sex (OR, 4.38-9.15) and regular exercise participation (OR, 6.45-18.94) positively predicted CSO achievement, whereas preoperative opioid use (OR, 0.06), depression (OR, 0.23), and living alone (OR, 0.90) were negative predictors of CSO achievement. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.
引用
收藏
页码:1731 / 1739
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The case for an international patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS®) initiative
    Jordi Alonso
    Susan J Bartlett
    Matthias Rose
    Neil K Aaronson
    John E Chaplin
    Fabio Efficace
    Alain Leplège
    Aiping LU
    David S Tulsky
    Hein Raat
    Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer
    Dennis Revicki
    Caroline B Terwee
    Jose M Valderas
    David Cella
    Christopher B Forrest
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11
  • [32] The case for an international patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS®) initiative
    Alonso, Jordi
    Bartlett, Susan J.
    Rose, Matthias
    Aaronson, Neil K.
    Chaplin, John E.
    Efficace, Fabio
    Leplege, Alain
    Lu, Aiping
    Tulsky, David S.
    Raat, Hein
    Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike
    Revicki, Dennis
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    Valderas, Jose M.
    Cella, David
    Forrest, Christopher B.
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2013, 11
  • [33] QUALITY OF LIFE AND UROLITHIASIS: THE PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES MEASUREMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROMIS)
    Brown, Robert
    Sarkissian, Carl
    Monga, Manoj
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (04): : E210 - E211
  • [34] Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System in Children with Crohn's Disease
    Arvanitis, Marina
    DeWalt, Darren A.
    Martin, Christopher F.
    Long, Millie D.
    Chen, Wenli
    Jaeger, Beth
    Sandler, Robert S.
    Kappelman, Michael D.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2016, 174 : 153 - 159
  • [35] The Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System in Spine: A Systematic Review
    Young, Kelsey
    Steinhaus, Michael
    Gang, Catherine
    Vaishnav, Avani
    Jivanelli, Bridget
    Lovecchio, Francis
    Qureshi, Sheeraz
    McAnany, Steven
    Kim, Han Jo
    Iyer, Sravisht
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2021, 15 (01): : 186 - 194
  • [36] The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System in spine surgery: a systematic review
    Haws, Brittany E.
    Khechen, Benjamin
    Bawa, Mundeep S.
    Patel, Dil V.
    Bawa, Harmeet S.
    Bohl, Daniel D.
    Wiggins, Adam B.
    Cardinal, Kaitlyn L.
    Guntin, Jordan A.
    Singh, Kern
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2019, 30 (03) : 405 - 413
  • [37] Patient-Reported Outcomes for Fractures of the Acetabulum: A Comparison Between Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System and Traditional Instruments
    Schumaier, Adam P.
    Matar, Robert N.
    Ramalingam, Wendy G.
    Archdeacon, Michael T.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2022, 30 (02) : 71 - 78
  • [38] How Should We Define Clinically Significant Improvement on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Test for Patients Undergoing Knee Meniscal Surgery?
    Okoroha, Kelechi R.
    Lu, Yining
    Nwachukwu, Benedict U.
    Beletsky, Alexander
    Patel, Bhavik H.
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    Cole, Brian
    Forsythe, Brian
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2020, 36 (01): : 241 - 250
  • [39] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Patients With CKD: The Case for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Tools
    Tang, Evan
    Yantsis, Alyssa
    Ho, Matthew
    Hussain, Junayd
    Dano, Sumaya
    Aiyegbusi, Olalekan L.
    Peipert, John D.
    Mucsi, Istvan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2024, 83 (04) : 508 - 518
  • [40] Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System and Legacy Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the Field of Orthopaedics: A Systematic Review
    Fidai, Mohsin S.
    Saltzman, Bryan M.
    Meta, Fabien
    Lizzio, Vincent A.
    Stephens, Jeffrey P.
    Bozic, Kevin J.
    Makhni, Eric C.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2018, 34 (02): : 605 - 614