Establishing Clinically Significant Outcomes for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System After Biceps Tenodesis

被引:15
|
作者
Forlenza, Enrico M. [1 ]
Lu, Yining [1 ]
Cohn, Matthew R. [1 ]
Baker, James [1 ]
Lavoie-Gagne, Ophelie [1 ]
Yanke, Adam B. [1 ]
Cole, Brian J. [1 ]
Verma, Nikhil N. [1 ]
Forsythe, Brian [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, 1611 W Harrison St, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PREOPERATIVE OPIOID USE; IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; IMPROVEMENT; PROMIS; HEALTH; WOMAC; SCORE; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2020.12.236
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To establish thresholds for improvement in patient-reported outcome scores that correspond with clinically significant outcomes (CSOs) including the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper extremity (UE) computer adaptive testing (CAT) and pain interference (PIF) CAT after biceps tenodesis (BT) and to assess patient variables that are associated with achieving these outcomes. Methods: After institutional review board approval was obtained, a prospectively maintained institutional database was queried for patients undergoing BT between December 2017 and August 2019. Patients undergoing BT in isolation or BT in conjunction with rotator cuff debridement, SLAP repair, subacromial decompression, or distal clavicle excision were included in the analysis. Anchor- and distribution-based methods were used to calculate the MCID whereas an anchor-based method was used to calculate SCB and the PASS for PROMIS UE CAT and PIF CAT. Results: A total of 112 patients (86.8% follow-up) who underwent BT were included for analysis. The MCID, net SCB, absolute SCB, and PASS for PROMIS UE CAT were 4.02, 9.25, 43.4, and 41.1, respectively. The MCID, net SCB, absolute SCB, and PASS for PROMIS PIF CAT were -4.12, -10.7, 52.4, and 52.4, respectively. Higher preoperative UE CAT and PIF CAT scores, preoperative opioid use, depression, and living alone were negative predictors of CSO achievement. Male sex and regular participation in exercise were positive predictors of CSO achievement. Conclusions: Patients with higher preoperative UE scores were less likely to achieve the MCID (odds ratio [OR], 0.84), whereas patients with higher preoperative PIF scores were less likely to achieve absolute SCB and the PASS (OR, 0.83-0.89). Most patients achieved the MCID for PIF CAT (70.5%) and UE CAT (62.5%) at final follow-up. Male sex (OR, 4.38-9.15) and regular exercise participation (OR, 6.45-18.94) positively predicted CSO achievement, whereas preoperative opioid use (OR, 0.06), depression (OR, 0.23), and living alone (OR, 0.90) were negative predictors of CSO achievement. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1731 / 1739
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Establishing clinically significant outcomes of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity questionnaire after primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
    Haunschild, Eric D.
    Condron, Nolan B.
    Gilat, Ron
    Fu, Michael C.
    Wolfson, Theodore
    Garrigues, Grant E.
    Nicholson, Gregory
    Forsythe, Brian
    Verma, Nikhil
    Cole, Brian J.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2021, 30 (10) : 2231 - 2239
  • [2] Establishing Clinically Significant Patient-reported Outcomes for Diverticular Disease
    Khor, Sara
    Flum, David R.
    Strate, Lisa L.
    Hantouli, Mariam N.
    Harris, Heather M.
    Lavallee, Danielle C.
    Spiegel, Brennan M. R.
    Davidson, Giana H.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 264 : 20 - 29
  • [3] Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction
    Aflatooni, Justin O.
    Meeks, Brett D.
    Froehle, Andrew W.
    Bonner, Kevin F.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [4] Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction
    Justin O. Aflatooni
    Brett D. Meeks
    Andrew W. Froehle
    Kevin F. Bonner
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 15
  • [5] Interpreting clinically significant changes in patient-reported outcomes
    Ringash, Jolie
    O'Sullivan, Brian
    Bezjak, Andrea
    Redelmeier, Donald A.
    CANCER, 2007, 110 (01) : 196 - 202
  • [6] THE PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES MEASUREMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM IN SPANISH
    Arnold, B. J.
    Correia, H.
    Perez, B.
    Lent, L.
    Cella, D.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (07) : A711 - A711
  • [7] Return to Sport and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis for SLAP Tear in Collegiate Gymnasts
    Ulrich, Marisa N.
    Cvetanovich, Gregory L.
    Meeks, Brett D.
    Jones, Grant L.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 11 (05)
  • [8] Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Tools for Collecting Patient-Reported Outcomes in Children With Juvenile Arthritis
    Brandon, Timothy G.
    Becker, Brandon D.
    Bevans, Katherine B.
    Weiss, Pamela F.
    ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2017, 69 (03) : 393 - 402
  • [9] Patient Reported Outcomes of Long Head Biceps Tenodesis after Spontaneous Rupture
    Monfared, Sina Hassan Beygi
    Lans, Jonathan
    Chen, Neal C.
    ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-ABJS, 2021, 9 (02): : 195 - 202
  • [10] Relationship between the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computer adaptive testing and legacy instruments in patients undergoing isolated biceps tenodesis
    Lu, Yining
    Agarwalla, Avinesh
    Patel, Bhavik H.
    Nwachukwu, Benedict U.
    Baker, James D.
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    Cole, Brian J.
    Forsythe, Brian
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2020, 29 (06) : 1214 - 1222