Baricity variation in a spinal anaesthesia mixture for caesarean section. Does it have any effect on anaesthetic quality? A randomised, double blind, controlled study

被引:0
|
作者
Schuitemaker, J. B. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Lopez-Pantaleon, L. A. [1 ,4 ]
Perez, P. Tejada [5 ]
Cullere, M. Cubedo [6 ]
Cohen, A. P. Sanchez [7 ]
Esqueda, A. T. Imbiscuso [8 ]
Diez, J. Acosta [9 ]
机构
[1] QuironSalud Hosp Univ Gen Catalunya, Serv Anestesiol Reanimac & Terapeut Dolor, Sant Cugat Del Valles, Cataluna, Spain
[2] Tintore & Braso Cirujanos Plast, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Med Dolor & Regenerat Clin Exolife, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Inst Hypnos SLP, Serv Anestesiol Reanimac & Terapeut Dolor, Sant Cugat Del Valles, Cataluna, Spain
[5] Hosp Aleman, Serv Anestesiol, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[6] Univ Barcelona, Fac Biol, Secc Estadist, Dept Genet,Microbiol Estadist, Barcelona, Spain
[7] QuironSalud Hosp Univ Gen Catalunya, Hosp Univ, Serv Radiol Intervencionista INTEM, Innovac Tecnol Med, Sant Cugat Del Valles, Cataluna, Spain
[8] Hosp Santa Caterina, Serv Anestesiol Reanimac & Terapeut Dolor, Girona, Spain
[9] QuironSalud Hosp Univ Gen Catalunya, Serv Ginecol & Obstet, Sant Cugat Del Valles, Cataluna, Spain
关键词
Caesarean section; Spinal anaesthesia; Local anaesthesia; Obstetrical anaesthesia; Nerve block; Bupivacaine; HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE; CEREBROSPINAL-FLUID; INTRATHECAL PLAIN; POSITION; DELIVERY; BLOCK;
D O I
10.1016/j.gine.2020.08.001
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction: This study was conducted to compare the effectiveness subarachnoid anaesthesia with bupivacaine plus fentanyl at different concentrations of dextrose for caesarean section. Methods: A double-blind, randomised study, which included 60 patients, aged between 18 and 40 years, ASA I-II for caesarean section class 3 or 4, divided into 3 groups, designated A, B, and C corresponding to dextrose 2, 4 and 6%, respectively, bupivacaine 6.25 mg plus fentanyl 25 mu g. Demographic characteristics were quantified, episodes of hypotension and bradycardia onset and duration of sensory block and motor block, surgeon and maternal satisfaction, adverse events and the effect of anaesthesia on the foetus and neonate. A p < .05 was considered statistically significant. Results: There was no difference in the demographic data, the three-anaesthetic mixture with dextrose were sufficient to provide level and duration of anesthesia for surgery. Maternal hypotension events were lower in group C (p < 0.05), the same group had lower external malleolus deep sensitivity (p < 0.05), only 5 cases were consistent with neonatal asphyxia, however the Apgar scores values were greater than 7 points, with satisfactory development. Conclusions: The three anaesthetic mixtures for subarachnoid anaesthesia with bupivacainefentanyl are clinically effective; however, the greater the amount of dextrose used the better block quality. (C) 2020 Elsevier Espa & ntilde;a, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 103
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] A randomised double-blind trial of phenylephrine and metaraminol infusions for prevention of hypotension during spinal and combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia for elective caesarean section
    McDonnell, N. J.
    Paech, M. J.
    Muchatuta, N. A.
    Hillyard, S.
    Nathan, E. A.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2017, 72 (05) : 609 - 617
  • [12] A double-blind assessment of the analgesic sparing effect of intrathecal diamorphine (0.3 mg) with spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section
    Graham, D
    Russell, IF
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 1997, 6 (04) : 224 - 230
  • [13] The effect of intravenous ondansetron on maternal haemodynamics during elective caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial
    Ortiz-Gomez, J. R.
    Palacio-Abizanda, F. J.
    Morillas-Ramirez, F.
    Fornet-Ruiz, I.
    Lorenzo-Jimenez, A.
    Bermejo-Albares, M. L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2014, 23 (02) : 138 - 143
  • [14] Norepinephrine or phenylephrine during spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery: a randomised double-blind pragmatic noninferiority study of neonatal outcome
    Kee, Warwick D. Ngan
    Lee, Shara W. Y.
    Ng, Floria F.
    Lee, Anna
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 125 (04) : 588 - 595
  • [15] Intrathecal dexmedetomidine as adjuvant for spinal anaesthesia for perianal ambulatory surgeries: A randomised double-blind controlled study
    Nethra, S. S.
    Sathesha, M.
    Aanchal, Dixit
    Dongare, Pradeep A.
    Harsoor, S. S.
    Devikarani, D.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 59 (03) : 177 - 181
  • [16] Effects of acupressure on pain and first mobilisation distance after caesarean section: A double-blind randomised controlled study
    Aksu, Aslihan
    cam-Yanik, Tugba
    Degirmenci, Filiz
    Vefikulucay-Yilmaz, Duygu
    Altun-Ugras, Gulay
    cevikoglu-Killi, Murside
    EXPLORE-THE JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND HEALING, 2025, 21 (01)
  • [17] Effect of an intravenous bolus of phenylephrine or ephedrine on skin blood flow during spinal anaesthesia: a randomised, double-blind, controlled study
    Dolci, Mirko
    Frascarolo, Philippe
    Hayoz, Daniel
    Spahn, Donat R.
    Gardaz, Jean-Patrice
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2011, 28 (03) : 226 - 229
  • [18] Comparison of the effects of norepinephrine and phenylephrine on shivering and hypothermia in patients undergoing caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia at a tertiary hospital in China : a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial protocol
    Tao, Wenhui
    Xie, Yufang
    Bao, Jinfeng
    Ding, Wei
    Zhang, Ye
    Hu, Xianwen
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (07): : 1 - 6
  • [19] The analgesic effect of transversalis fascia plane block after caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia with intrathecal morphine: a randomised controlled trial
    Baghirzada, L.
    Walker, A.
    Yu, H. C.
    Endersby, R.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 79 (01) : 63 - 70
  • [20] Does gabapentin have an analgesic effect on background, movement and referred pain? A randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled study
    McCleane, GJ
    PAIN CLINIC, 2001, 13 (02): : 103 - 107